Clinton Camp Claims Next Wikileaks Will Be Fakes

[Mycroft]

A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton's campaign said Sunday that if Wikileaks were to publish a bombshell email in the final two days of the election, it would likely not be authentic.
“Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days - it’s probably a fake,” tweeted Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Clinton campaign.


Clinton campaign: Ignore 'whopper' emails from WikiLeaks in last 2 days - Business Insider

:lamo

Yes, because they've got all the credibility in the world on their side...Wow. So Hillary KNOWS there's some really bad E-mails out there and she's expecting something especially damaging from Assange in the next couple of days ( so am I ).

Tell you what, Hillary...you just let ME be the judge of that.

 

[Greenbeard]

I wondered about that strategy, too. Last night I read (somewhere) that their goal was to organize a logical and readable roll-out close to the election based on the belief that most voters weren't truly engaged until the last couple of days.

Somebody probably should've told them that 40 million people have already voted.

 

[Fenton]

While I think it's important to raise the possibility of tampered or fake documents, saying this just leads me back to Giuliani's goof this week. When asked if he had some inside information he said he did, then later backtracked.

It just makes the Clinton team look compromised by Wikileaks, which isn't good, considering they are trying to paint Wikileaks as a foul rogue entity (at best) and the arm of Putin at worst.

By the way, Wikileaks is a foul organization and Assange is a reprehensible man.

Hillary was compromised long before Assange started releasing Podestas Emails Which makes me question why on earth the DNC thought she was a good pick for the Democrat candidate.

 

[Fenton]

Somebody probably should've told them that 40 million people have already voted.

Tell me about it. Our local polling place had lines of cars going down the street for the first 4 days. Finally it cleared up a bit right up until that Friday when Comey sent his letter to Congress. That must have energized a whole new block of voters.

 

[Grand Mal]

ISIS wants Hillary elected, who in the world is worse than them?

What? Where'd you get that?

 

[Grand Mal]

And with due cause! She is The Butcher of Benghazi, the Murderer of Gaddafi and the defender of child rapists. She is one sick, perverted, inhuman lesbian bitch and she will go to prison for a long time. SHE, not Wikileaks, is a fake, and people who support her are no better.

Well, that sounds kind of negative!

 

[Grand Mal]

Hillary was compromised long before Assange started releasing Podestas Emails Which makes me question why on earth the DNC thought she was a good pick for the Democrat candidate.

You think that's something? The Republican Party spent months trying to come up with someone who could lose the election for them. You wouldn't think such a thing was possible, yet here we are...

 

[Quazimodo]

You think that's something? The Republican Party spent months trying to come up with someone who could lose the election for them. You wouldn't think such a thing was possible, yet here we are...

Actually, the Republican party had very little to do with selecting Donald Trump. State after state, it was The People who chose him and they chose him overwhelmingly. His nomination IS the truest effort by any American electorate in a long time to pick a Man who has the ability and the balls to stand up to the corruption and disgrace that has evolved into the type of politics and governance we have today.

The Clinton Camp is desperately afraid of losing. The reason Clinton supporters are afraid of losing is because they will have to get a job in order to buy food, weed and tattoos. The "free ride" will be over. No more welfare checks. How's that for negative?

 

[Fenton]

You think that's something? The Republican Party spent months trying to come up with someone who could lose the election for them. You wouldn't think such a thing was possible, yet here we are...

You and I agree there. I was a Cruz supporter and consider Trump only marginally better than Hillary. If Trump follows through with his promises ( if he wins ) then Ill change my opinion

 

[Grand Mal]

Actually, the Republican party had very little to do with selecting Donald Trump. State after state, it was The People who chose him and they chose him overwhelmingly. His nomination IS the truest effort by any American electorate in a long time to pick a Man who has the ability and the balls to stand up to the corruption and disgrace that has evolved into the type of politics and governance we have today.

The Clinton Camp is desperately afraid of losing. The reason Clinton supporters are afraid of losing is because they will have to get a job in order to buy food, weed and tattoos. The "free ride" will be over. No more welfare checks. How's that for negative?

It's the same thing either way. Neither side wants to be the one who lost to the worst candidate the other party has had in living memory. If you think Trump is any less corrupt than Clinton, you're one of the few who can hope for a happy ending to this fiasco, because Trump is a shyster snake-oil salesman. Clinton's a Gorgon and Trump's an untrustworthy bankrupt.
Just curious- who do you think the Republican Party is, if it isn't the Republicans who voted for their candidate? I was watching- Trump didn't overcome any 'status quo', he won in a cake walk, not even close.

 

[iguanaman]

Not everyone that wants Trump elected is "bad", most are just scared of Hillary.

You got the scared right but it is more about immigrants and their social standing than Hillary. That and they are easily conned.

 

[iguanaman]

They're getting their butts kicked now, by the Ruskies

Prior to their involvement Obama's war on ISIS was just a bunch of empty proclamations and bad Sports analogies


For example.....

Obama declares ISIS contained a day before Paris terrorists attack.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2015/11/14/politics/paris-terror-attacks-obama-isis-contained/index.html?client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us

The Russians have not lifted a finger to stop ISIS their only aim is secure Assad. A full 90% of their airstrikes have targeted the moderate resistance in Syria
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/07/russia-airstrikes-syria-not-targetting-isis

 

[Abbazorkzog]

You got the scared right but it is more about immigrants and their social standing than Hillary. That and they are easily conned.

I think its about 50/50. Even Clinton said "around half of Trump supporters are what I like to call a 'basket of deplorables'".

 

[Quazimodo]

It's the same thing either way. Neither side wants to be the one who lost to the worst candidate the other party has had in living memory. If you think Trump is any less corrupt than Clinton, you're one of the few who can hope for a happy ending to this fiasco, because Trump is a shyster snake-oil salesman. Clinton's a Gorgon and Trump's an untrustworthy bankrupt.
Just curious- who do you think the Republican Party is, if it isn't the Republicans who voted for their candidate? I was watching- Trump didn't overcome any 'status quo', he won in a cake walk, not even close.

That's a fair question. I've thought about it before and it is my belief that The Bush family, Kasich, Graham(SC), Kristol & Co., Ryan, et al., had and have the most to lose. I think that people I know had little to no trouble seeing through the nature and value of career politicians and decided they had eaten enough pol-crap for a lifetime. At that point, the question, "What have I got to lose?" started driving the political decision making process.

Generally, politicians aren't viewed as productive members of our society, but instead as remoras. After breaking promise after promise after victories we gave them in the mid terms, it became obvious that they could no longer be trusted. So, again, we had nothing to lose and everything to gain. We are not stupid, in fact we are inclined to be staunchly pragmatic. We decided early on that finding a "perfectly pure" politician was a "fools errand." In point, we aren't looking for a new Preacher! WE are looking for a WARRIOR. He says he will drain the swamp. I believe he will. He says he will clean house. I believe he will. Here's what he will not do:HE WILL NOT COMMIT ACTS OF TREASON.

Remember, Donald Trump is not responsible for the potentially terminal disease our country finds itself in right now. Hillary represents absolutely no hope for salvation. That leaves Donald Trump and it is because of that he has captured the hearts and minds of many, many millions of Americans who care just as much about this country as I do.

To me, Hillary represents destruction. Trump is a builder. Clinton is a proven failure and we have to be honest enough to admit it.

 

[eohrnberger]

Not everyone that wants Trump elected is "bad", most are just scared of Hillary.

Perhaps not scared of Hillery per se, but definitely what Hillary is capable of doing to the nation, I'd say.

 

[RickJames3000]

Well, that sounds kind of negative!

True. So many with half-empty glasses.
Drinking that kool aid.

 

[jmotivator]

A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton's campaign said Sunday that if Wikileaks were to publish a bombshell email in the final two days of the election, it would likely not be authentic.
“Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days - it’s probably a fake,” tweeted Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Clinton campaign.


Clinton campaign: Ignore 'whopper' emails from WikiLeaks in last 2 days - Business Insider

:lamo

Yes, because they've got all the credibility in the world on their side...Wow. So Hillary KNOWS there's some really bad E-mails out there and she's expecting something especially damaging from Assange in the next couple of days ( so am I ).

They will "probably" be fakes? So... they admit there are still whoppers out there...

 

[RickJames3000]

That's a fair question. I've thought about it before and it is my belief that The Bush family, Kasich, Graham(SC), Kristol & Co., Ryan, et al., had and have the most to lose. I think that people I know had little to no trouble seeing through the nature and value of career politicians and decided they had eaten enough pol-crap for a lifetime. At that point, the question, "What have I got to lose?" started driving the political decision making process.

Generally, politicians aren't viewed as productive members of our society, but instead as remoras. After breaking promise after promise after victories we gave them in the mid terms, it became obvious that they could no longer be trusted. So, again, we had nothing to lose and everything to gain. We are not stupid, in fact we are inclined to be staunchly pragmatic. We decided early on that finding a "perfectly pure" politician was a "fools errand." In point, we aren't looking for a new Preacher! WE are looking for a WARRIOR. He says he will drain the swamp. I believe he will. He says he will clean house. I believe he will. Here's what he will not do:HE WILL NOT COMMIT ACTS OF TREASON.

Remember, Donald Trump is not responsible for the potentially terminal disease our country finds itself in right now. Hillary represents absolutely no hope for salvation. That leaves Donald Trump and it is because of that he has captured the hearts and minds of many, many millions of Americans who care just as much about this country as I do.

To me, Hillary represents destruction. Trump is a builder. Clinton is a proven failure and we have to be honest enough to admit it.

You mean, like, giving support and comfort to ISIS and other enemies?:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...is-trump-rooting-against-u-s-troops-in-mosul/

Or do you mean supporting foreign agents actively working to undermine our electoral process?:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html

Never Forget. 2016.

 

[Mycroft]

They will "probably" be fakes? So... they admit there are still whoppers out there...

They've already admitted that at least one of the emails is factual...by coming out and "explaining" what Podesta "really meant" by what he said.

Myself...I've seen no reason to think any of them are false.

 

[jmotivator]

They've already admitted that at least one of the emails is factual...by coming out and "explaining" what Podesta "really meant" by what he said.

Myself...I've seen no reason to think any of them are false.

They aren't fake. The big clue is that DNC damage control has focused on imaginary origins rather than veracity.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Jesus these Clinton Corp people are stupid...this is much more effective if they say it immediately after something bad comes out.

THey fired too early, could not resist, because CLINTON CORP SUCKS!

 

[eohrnberger]

They will "probably" be fakes? So... they admit there are still whoppers out there...

Since when is the 'Clinton Camp', or Hillary for that matter, known for telling the truth?

 

[jmotivator]

Since when is the 'Clinton Camp', or Hillary for that matter, known for telling the truth?

Any truth told is entirely by accident

 

[Mycroft]

Since when is the 'Clinton Camp', or Hillary for that matter, known for telling the truth?

Never.

You know what they say...

How do you know Obama is lying? Look to see if his lips are moving.

How do you know Hillary is lying? Check for a pulse.

LOL!!

 

[Risky Thicket]

A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton's campaign said Sunday that if Wikileaks were to publish a bombshell email in the final two days of the election, it would likely not be authentic.
“Friends, please remember that if you see a whopper of a Wikileaks in next two days - it’s probably a fake,” tweeted Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Clinton campaign.


Clinton campaign: Ignore 'whopper' emails from WikiLeaks in last 2 days - Business Insider

:lamo

Yes, because they've got all the credibility in the world on their side...Wow. So Hillary KNOWS there's some really bad E-mails out there and she's expecting something especially damaging from Assange in the next couple of days ( so am I ).

Yeah, if there is only one thing Hillary has going for her it is the fact that she is widely trusted. :lamo

"Trust me, those feckers are lying when they soon release more information that I don't know about, because it isn't true even though I haven't seen it and therefore don't know what it is. But the release will be total bull****tery, even though I don't know what it is, because it isn't true, though I haven't seen it. Trust me because families, little children, chitlins and corn pone, coal workers, MLK, women, and you know, young people and sh*t like that."