- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 25,357
- Reaction score
- 11,557
- Location
- Post-Trump America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
This video (I literally just watched prior to seeing the OP) answers IMO your "questions:"
So what do we got? Take away the names.
1. 5+ year old rumor that politician is buried deep with plot to get uranium from a foreign country and enrich a charitable foundation through those funds.
2. New rumor that a different politician's son is buried deep with a plot to enrich his family with foreign funds.
3. Fact that a sitting President bribed a country on eight separate occasions to look into oppo research on his political rival.
4. Sitting President appears to take issue w/something that they claim rival does, while doing what they claim rival does.
*supporters of sitting President still somehow don't see a problem w/point number 4???
What is different about what Trump did vs what you all think Biden/Clinton did?
According to alt-right conspiracy theories, Clinton is buried deep in a Uranium One plot where she got money from foreign countries. There is no proof to this conspiracy theory.
According to alt-right conspiracy theories, Biden's son is buried deep in a Ukrainian plot where the family got money from foreign countries. No proof has been presented by Team Trump to back up those claims.
According to a whistle-blower who has gone through all the proper channels and who's claims has been fact-checked by various news organizations... There is hard proof, audio records, and notes that Trump and team have asked Ukraine multiple times to look into Joe Biden in order to benefit Trump's election in 2020. Accordingly Trump dangled foreign aid to Ukraine after Putin's invasion of that country and only if they'd do that.
So what do we got? Take away the names.
1. 5+ year old rumor that politician is buried deep with plot to get uranium from a foreign country and enrich a charitable foundation through those funds.
2. New rumor that a different politician's son is buried deep with a plot to enrich his family with foreign funds.
3. Fact that a sitting President bribed a country on eight separate occasions to look into oppo research on his political rival.
4. Sitting President appears to take issue w/something that they claim rival does, while doing what they claim rival does.
*supporters of sitting President still somehow don't see a problem w/point number 4???
What is different about what Trump did vs what you all think Biden/Clinton did?
According to alt-right conspiracy theories, Clinton is buried deep in a Uranium One plot where she got money from foreign countries. There is no proof to this conspiracy theory.
According to alt-right conspiracy theories, Biden's son is buried deep in a Ukrainian plot where the family got money from foreign countries. No proof has been presented by Team Trump to back up those claims.
According to a whistle-blower who has gone through all the proper channels and who's claims has been fact-checked by various news organizations... There is hard proof, audio records, and notes that Trump and team have asked Ukraine multiple times to look into Joe Biden in order to benefit Trump's election in 2020. Accordingly Trump dangled foreign aid to Ukraine after Putin's invasion of that country and only if they'd do that.
Investigating political corruption is now something the media is against, apparently.
The claims by the whistleblower haven't been disclosed. How could they be fact-checked? The word you're grasping for is "speculated".
No it doesn't. It doesn't answer the question b/t what you think are the differences in each of these two scenarios? Are you saying that Biden and Clinton were just soooo good at collusion, while Trump constantly fails?
Uh, you think they just making it all up then huh?
The claims by the whistleblower haven't been disclosed. How could they be fact-checked? The word you're grasping for is "speculated".
There's evidence of corruption by both Clinton and Biden.
Haven't you gotten tired of being jerked around by Trump scandal stories that have yet to bear fruit?
Maybe this time, right?
So why are news organizations saying specific facts about said claims like the payment price and the number of times Trump asked Ukraine to look into Joe Biden?
Rudy Giuliani yapping on TV about Biden is not evidence.
Some dude donating to Clinton Foundation is not evidence of corruption.
It wouldnt be the first time they didUh, you think they just making it all up then huh?
Again ... Where's the story that has disclosed what was in the whistleblower complaint?
Do you really think someone reported the actual contents of the complaint?
No wonder you sound so confused.
Have you really not watched the news in the past 24 hours? So that's what you are saying, they are making it up. Jeez Louise.
So what do we got? Take away the names.
1. 5+ year old rumor that politician is buried deep with plot to get uranium from a foreign country and enrich a charitable foundation through those funds.
2. New rumor that a different politician's son is buried deep with a plot to enrich his family with foreign funds.
3. Fact that a sitting President bribed a country on eight separate occasions to look into oppo research on his political rival.
4. Sitting President appears to take issue w/something that they claim rival does, while doing what they claim rival does.
*supporters of sitting President still somehow don't see a problem w/point number 4???
What is different about what Trump did vs what you all think Biden/Clinton did?
According to alt-right conspiracy theories, Clinton is buried deep in a Uranium One plot where she got money from foreign countries. There is no proof to this conspiracy theory.
According to alt-right conspiracy theories, Biden's son is buried deep in a Ukrainian plot where the family got money from foreign countries. No proof has been presented by Team Trump to back up those claims.
According to a whistle-blower who has gone through all the proper channels and who's claims has been fact-checked by various news organizations... There is hard proof, audio records, and notes that Trump and team have asked Ukraine multiple times to look into Joe Biden in order to benefit Trump's election in 2020. Accordingly Trump dangled foreign aid to Ukraine after Putin's invasion of that country and only if they'd do that.
You can have your own opinion but not your own facts. This is not a fact.Fact that a sitting President bribed a country on eight separate occasions to look into oppo research on his political rival.
There has been next to zero fact checking. How do I know because the media would have told us all of it if they had it. The one thing they sad was Trump offered nothing in return. Democrats hatred of Trump and conservatives and the wealthy is going to destroy this country but they don't care because they want power to impose their crazy liberal social agenda, and get rich in the process.
I don't know how to break this to you but the contents of the whistleblower complaint have not been disclosed.
If they had you'd be able to present them right here on DP.
You can't.
If you could have you would have.
It appears you're still confusing speculation about the contents with the actual contents.
I told you that earlier.
One thing should be worrying you.
If the contents are ever disclosed you'd better hope they deliver the goods cuz up to now you've had nothing and another failure could be fatal.
Are you denying the credibility problem the people reporting this have?Um so you're just denying some of the contents have been disclosed such as the ones mentioned in my OP, right? I just wanna get that on record.
Are you denying the credibility problem the people reporting this have?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Is that a yes or no?Are you talking about Rudy Giuliani?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?