Vincent Gray - PhD (University of Cambridge), physical chemistry
I would like to see that in context. Which assessment report or other IPCC literature is that from?Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“It is unequivocal that the increase of CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere over the industrial era is the result of human activities and that human influence is the principal driver of many changes observed across the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere, and biosphere.
“Since systematic scientific assessments began in the 1970s, the influence of human activity on the warming of the climate system has evolved from theory to established fact.”13-17
This video is accurate. Those involved with the IPCC Assessment Reports are practicing scientific malpractice.David Deming - PhD & professor (University of Oklahoma)
Would you like that? Look it upI would like to see that in context. Which assessment report or other IPCC literature is that from?
From a political office? I went to several links. It only links to the main page. Not what they say. Too much meaningless, political information.List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
Ooooooh an opinionThis video is accurate. Those involved with the IPCC Assessment Reports are practicing scientific malpractice.
Those are scientific organizationsFrom a political office? I went to several links. It only links to the main page. Not what they say. Too much meaningless, political information.
How about some science please? Politics does not belong in science.
They have at least two dozen reports of one type or another. I took several minutes for a search. online. I will pull up the six assessments reports I have saved and search them. Since you are unwilling to link the material, I suspect it is made up or paraphrased. Since you are unwilling to link the material, I say its invalid. Probably came from a lying blogger.Would you like that? Look it up
It's from the nasa consensus page which I have posted repeatedly and it's references are linked at the bottomThey have at least two dozen reports of one type or another. I took several minutes for a search. online. I will pull up the six assessments reports I have saved and search them. Since you are unwilling to link the material, I suspect it is made up or paraphrased. Since you are unwilling to link the material, I say its invalid. Probably came from a lying blogger.
He never read it.It's from the nasa consensus page which I have posted repeatedly and it's references are linked at the bottom
Did you listen to it? He is 100% that the scientific consensus on the medieval warming is overwhelming, but removed from more recent IPCC material after the Hickey Stick, which is also scientific malpractice. Years ago, I pointed out one major cherry picking involved in its creation. There is other valid critism os the hockey stick. Mine was tracing a scientific mission where 18 samples were taken off the coast of Africa. Some of those samples were incomplete, but almost a dozen were complete samples. Mann used three of the proxy samples that showed warming, and exuded the ones that were neutral, and even showed cooling.Ooooooh an opinion
Dismissed
Ooooooooh an opinionDid you listen to it? He is 100% that the scientific consensus on the medieval warming is overwhelming, but removed from more recent IPCC material after the Hickey Stick, which is also scientific malpractice. Years ago, I pointed out one major cherry picking involved in its creation. There is other valid critism os the hockey stick. Mine was tracing a scientific mission where 18 samples were taken off the coast of Africa. Some of those samples were incomplete, but almost a dozen were complete samples. Mann used three of the proxy samples that showed warming, and exuded the ones that were neutral, and even showed cooling.
That is not science.
Other proxy samples have similar problems in his research.
So, its from a blog like I suspected. At least now, I can find the material and read it in full context. But worse yet, its not from the science material they provide, but the material for policy makers.It's from the nasa consensus page which I have posted repeatedly and it's references are linked at the bottom
So it's not from a YouTube video?So, its from a blog like I suspected. At least now, I can find the material and read it in full context. But worse yet, its not from the science material they provide, but the material for policy makers.
You really need to link quotes please. Why do you think people accept your word?
At least what has been posted by Neil are scientists speaking out against what other scientists are said to say, who do not speak on the topic, but just write papers that are misconstrued by the public.So it's not from a YouTube video?
Hahahahaha
Hey guys look what I found on youtube!!!!!!At least what has been posted by Neil are scientists speaking out against what other scientists are said to say, who do not speak on the topic, but just write papers that are misconstrued by the public.
This video is accurate. Those involved with the IPCC Assessment Reports are practicing scientific malpractice.
Hey guys look what I found on youtube!!!!!!
Hahahahaha
I haven't found this yet. Too bad you rarely ever verify the material you link.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
“It is unequivocal that the increase of CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere over the industrial era is the result of human activities and that human influence is the principal driver of many changes observed across the atmosphere, ocean, cryosphere, and biosphere.
This I found in the WG1 Full Report, reference 15. In full context:“Since systematic scientific assessments began in the 1970s, the influence of human activity on the warming of the climate system has evolved from theory to established fact.”13-17
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?