- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Messages
- 63,709
- Reaction score
- 29,116
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I think Mann is saying that Hansen's claims conflict with what he believes is the mainstream
Climate Science. Basically that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
My point is that is Mann is skeptical, Hansen must REALLY be on the fringe.
Yet you have no real clue how mainstream Mann actually is.
Why don't you go work on your paper outlining how the solar peak in 1958 is causing the warming in 2016. The scientific world awaits your amateur interpretation with anticipation.