- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 47,360
- Reaction score
- 26,059
- Location
- Springfield MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
In reading about Climate change, to refute the usual deniers, it's pretty spooky stuff.
They do not know what's worst case...
They do not know what is the point of no return, or what positive feedback loops might unwind for decades, or centuries, after we try to correct our atmospheric conditions.
I predict a day when insurance companies will no longer offer flood insurance in many areas. Some major insurance companies have already pulled out of Florida altogether when it comes to property insurance.
State Farm leaving Florida property insurance market
TALLAHASSEE - Little more than two weeks after state regulators turned down its request for a 47.1 percent rate hike, State Farm announced Tuesday it would stop offering property insurance in Florida…www.jacksonville.com
Ice mass melting which in turn reflects less sun, which causes more warming, which melts more ice..We're already in the find-out stage of feedbacks. The boreal forests keep burning, and as they do, they pump lots of CO2 into the atmosphere.
The albedo effect.Ice mass melting which in turn reflects less sun, which causes more warming, which melts more ice..
The idea of a point of no return or warming in the pipeline is not supported by the very science that predicts the high climate sensitivity.In reading about Climate change, to refute the usual deniers, it's pretty spooky stuff.
They do not know what's worst case...
They do not know what is the point of no return, or what positive feedback loops might unwind for decades, or centuries, after we try to correct our atmospheric conditions.
Unfortunately modern technology and a strong demand for housing has pushed development to places thatI predict a day when insurance companies will no longer offer flood insurance in many areas. Some major insurance companies have already pulled out of Florida altogether when it comes to property insurance.
State Farm leaving Florida property insurance market
TALLAHASSEE - Little more than two weeks after state regulators turned down its request for a 47.1 percent rate hike, State Farm announced Tuesday it would stop offering property insurance in Florida…www.jacksonville.com
You want us to do something about a thing you claim we can't do anything about? Maybe you should clarify.Well, get off the computer and do something about it. All everyone does is talk. This so called climate change will not be something any of us will be able to control. Throwing money in the wind.
Already happening.I predict a day when insurance companies will no longer offer flood insurance in many areas. Some major insurance companies have already pulled out of Florida altogether when it comes to property insurance.
State Farm leaving Florida property insurance market
TALLAHASSEE - Little more than two weeks after state regulators turned down its request for a 47.1 percent rate hike, State Farm announced Tuesday it would stop offering property insurance in Florida…www.jacksonville.com
You may want to read this study. It correlates the extra precipitation with the Urban growth. It appears they found a correlation between city locations and precipitation.Climate change is supercharging the water cycle, bringing heavier precipitation extremes — and related flood risks — across the U.S.
As the climate has warmed from 1958 to 2021, the most extreme precipitation days have intensified in every major U.S. region, led by the Northeast (+60%) and Midwest (+45%).
This hazardous intensification is expected to continue with future warming.
High future levels of extreme precipitation intensification are concentrated in: Alaska, Hawaii, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Maine, North Carolina, and Kentucky.
People, ecosystems, and infrastructure in both wet and dry locations are facing the risks that come with short bursts of extreme rainfall.
Climate change is bringing heavier rainfall extremes and increased, inequitable flood risk to many parts of the U.S.
For every 1°F of warming the air can hold an extra 4% of moisture, increasing the chances of heavier downpours that contribute to the risk of flash floods.
Heavy downpours bring more rain, faster — causing flash flooding and landslides that can displace families, drown crops, damage infrastructure, and expose people to hazardous debris, contaminants, and water-borne disease.
In the U.S., extreme daily rainfall has become more frequent since the 1980s. Hourly rainfall intensity has also increased since 1970 — by 13% on average across 150 U.S. locations analyzed by Climate Central.
As the climate has warmed over recent decades, the most extreme precipitation days have become more intense across the U.S.
As precipitation extremes intensify, the wettest days each year bring increasing flood hazards. And this intensification trend has been widespread.
In the Northeast and Midwest, the amount of precipitation falling on the heaviest 1% of days has increased 60% and 45%, respectively, from 1958 to 2021 according to the Fifth National Climate Assessment.
The heaviest rainfall events have become wetter across all other major regions of the continental U.S. from 1958 to 2021 as well, led by: the Southeast (+37%); the Northern Rockies and Plains (+24%); and the South (+21%).
Extreme Precipitation in a Warming Climate | Climate Central
Climate change is supercharging the water cycle, bringing heavier precipitation extremes across the U.S.www.climatecentral.org
Bottom line: we are already experiencing the extreme negative events resulting from global warming/climate change, and it is predicted to only get worse.
You may want to read this study. It correlates the extra precipitation with the Urban growth. It appears they found a correlation between city locations and precipitation.
This research reports a global analysis of urban precipitation anomalies encompassing over one thousand cities worldwide. While earlier studies have focused on the impact of urbanization on precipitation for specific cities or isolated thunderstorm cases, our research breaks innovative ground by mapping global urban precipitation hotspots over the past 20 y. This study provides global evidence of noticeable urban precipitation anomalies, especially in hot and humid climates. Beyond the anticipated influence of local climate, our findings reveal that higher levels of urbanization enhance these urban precipitation anomalies. This research not only deepens our understanding of how cities shape precipitation but also establishes the groundwork for incorporating urbanization considerations into future precipitation projections.
Duh...From the article: “We find that more than 60% of the global cities AND THEIR DOWNWIND REGIONS are receiving more precipitation than the surrounding rural areas.”. All that this is really saying is that the heat from urban areas enhances the intensity of thunderstorms which results in more moisture being developed and eventually being sent back to Earth as rain and the increased potential for flooding. Not all thunderstorms pass over urban areas, and yet gain strength as a result of additional heat in the atmosphere due to global warming/climate change. That is the point of this thread.
Duh...
Kind of blows your argument away.
So your solution is to do nothing at all?Well, get off the computer and do something about it. All everyone does is talk. This so called climate change will not be something any of us will be able to control. Throwing money in the wind.
You do not get it. The heat signatures are different.Just the opposite. It shows that heat increases the strength of thunderstorms. That would also include atmospheric heat on an overall basis, not just that associated with urban areas.
Why do something about an imaginary problem?So your solution is to do nothing at all?
CO2 is also a pollutant byproduct of combustion, industry, and such. But the real problem I'd overpopulation. Climate change, pollution, and such issues are simply a symptom and consequence of that problem.Why do something about an imaginary problem?
CO2 is not the problem. Actual pollutants we inject into the air like soot are the problem. The agenda is focusing on fiction instead of reality.
Wrong. CO2 is a product of energy production, but older methods have pollutants as a byproduct. CO2 is a necessary gas for all life on earth. The biosphere loves more of it. We are making the planet greener by our CO2 emissions.CO2 is also a pollutant byproduct of combustion, industry, and such.
That is a different problem. But more CO2 will help with growing more crops for a larger population.But the real problem I'd overpopulation.
I see you are lacking in science but indoctrinated rather well.Climate change, pollution, and such issues are simply a symptom and consequence of that problem.
Plant life can only absorb so much CO2 at a time. With increased deforestation, the total amount absorbed drops and CO2 concentrations rise. It's the proverbial "too much of a good thing." Except too much CO2 is not a good thing, especially in terms of the greenhouse effect. Science is on side on this one.Wrong. CO2 is a product of energy production, but older methods have pollutants as a byproduct. CO2 is a necessary gas for all life on earth. The biosphere loves more of it. We are making the planet greener by our CO2 emissions.
That is a different problem. But more CO2 will help with growing more crops for a larger population.
I see you are lacking in science but indoctrinated rather well.
Can you show me explicit scientific evidence that more CO2 is harmful?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?