• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Classified documents from Biden's time as VP discovered in private office, source says

Napoleon said:
The DOJ has always treated willful negligence as intent under this statute and that is also indisputable here. Biden broke the law - in the best case scenario - as a consequence of his willful negligence. A willful negligence further evidenced by the fact that A) These documents were moved from the White House to two different locations, B) He’s been in illegal possession of these documents for 6 years, and C) He’s not the one who reported it. Instead, his attorneys did after rifling through a university closet for some unknown reason.
Click to expand...
Willful negligence is a legal term applicable to civil cases only. It has no meaning in criminal law.
 
Napoleon said:
You’re so close. In case of what? A FVPOTUS hires attorneys to move boxes of his shit in case of what? And why didn’t Biden do this 6 years ago before he walked out of the White House with stolen top secret SCI documents?
Click to expand...

When the documents to be moved involve attorney/client privilege information. As one example.

WW
 
Napoleon said:
It would not surprise me if he stole them and eventually forgot he stole them until he was informed that his office is being closed.
Click to expand...
Stole them? Please.

We have no idea what purpose they were used for, but I don't see any malintent here.
 
Rawley said:
They are. Biden took classified docs. End of story. Your ridiculous Trump document "scandal" is dead.
Click to expand...
I admire your ability to wave your hand and declare an obvious crime "dead."

Anyone with a working cerebral cortex should be able to determine the different between these two incidents. Yet, here we are.
 
Anyone hear why this is only becoming news now, instead of when it happened?
 
Napoleon said:
It does when the DOJ uses it as a determinative standard for criminal charges.
Click to expand...
If you pay with counterfeit money and the clerk catches it, do you assume you're going to jail?
 
Rawley said:
They are. Biden took classified docs. End of story. Your ridiculous Trump document "scandal" is dead.
Click to expand...
Not by a long shot. Now we have two cases of unlawfully retaining government documents and each one will be determined on its own merit.
 
Cardinal said:
You paid with counterfeit money. End of story.

Or is it?
Click to expand...
Yes. End of story. Even your loon media is going WTF?, we thought he had him.
 
Michael Cole said:
Are you claiming Biden doesn't have the security clearance to view classified information? Really?
Click to expand...
Biden was allowed to take the documents with him when his term as VP ended. He’s not allowed to take the documents with him on his way out the door.
 
Arlette said:
Not by a long shot. Now we have two cases of unlawfully retaining government documents and each one will be determined on its own merit.
Click to expand...
Nope. 1,000% political not legal Case against Trump is dead as a doornail
 
Napoleon said:
That’s not an answer. Why hire a lawyer to do the job of a brute? Do you hire attorneys just to lug a box of nothingburgers from one office to another? I call the descendants of the Roman gods when I want something moved not some egghead attorney.
Click to expand...
Maybe Biden suspected they were there and wanted his lawyer to find them before anyone else did. 🤷‍♂️ Who knows why a lawyer was sent as opposed to a typical moving company. Hopefully these and other questions get answered in short order. In any case, both the incumbent and former POTUS' have a documents scandal on their hands. It's now a matter of why the documents were taken, who handles the situation more professionally and how the law is eventually applied in both cases.

Hopefully, we'll know more in time...
 
Rawley said:
Yes. End of story.
Click to expand...

Well, no, it isn't actually. You paid with counterfeit money (and you definitely have, so don't bother denying it). But assuming you didn't do it on purpose, you wouldn't be in trouble.

But we can take this analogy one step further: You realize you have counterfeit money so you turn it in to the authorities. Do you still think you would be in trouble? (The answer is no, you wouldn't).

Rawley said:
Even your loon media is going WTF?, we thought he had him.
Click to expand...
 
MTAtech said:
I admire your ability to wave your hand and declare an obvious crime "dead."

Anyone with a working cerebral cortex should be able to determine the different between these two incidents. Yet, here we are.
Click to expand...
LOL Cling to that dream.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom