- Joined
- Jan 26, 2025
- Messages
- 2,606
- Reaction score
- 671
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
What I know to be absurd is that kind of simplistic and, frankly, politics-driven, thinking. It's true that we have a largely service-based economy, and we used that rationale to allow our manufacturing base to fade. But it's not necessary that it be one or the other. For example, nothing keeps us from smelting steel or aluminum except lower prices from other countries, And why are their prices lower? Because of lower wages and our companies being blocked out of their markets by tariffs. If we raised tariffs to match theirs, or they lowered theirs, steel and aluminum smelted here would come very close to the prices charged here by foreign smelters; at least close enough that dishwasher manufacturers could afford to use American steel.You can't reverse economic and manufacturing progress anymore than you can hold back waves with your hand. As an economy ages, it either progresses or stagnates, we chose to not have kids working in factories, we chose to have nurses rather to keep digging coal. This country is a service based economy, you are not going to have factories suddenly pop-up and fill them with fired DC planners screwing i-phones together. Its absurd, you know it is.
Sure. China charges a 125% tariff on many U.S. products in China. That's why Trump imposed a 125% tariff on some Chinese products.Have you any specific examples of that happening?
I can't speak to steel but smelting aluminum in the States is cost prohibitive given your domestic supply of both bauxite and electricity. The CEO of Alcoa .What I know to be absurd is that kind of simplistic and, frankly, politics-driven, thinking. It's true that we have a largely service-based economy, and we used that rationale to allow our manufacturing base to fade. But it's not necessary that it be one or the other. For example, nothing keeps us from smelting steel or aluminum except lower prices from other countries, And why are their prices lower? Because of lower wages and our companies being blocked out of their markets by tariffs. If we raised tariffs to match theirs, or they lowered theirs, steel and aluminum smelted here would come very close to the prices charged here by foreign smelters; at least close enough that dishwasher manufacturers could afford to use American steel.
OK......China maybe although you provide no specifics.......now let's talk about the rest of the worldSure. China charges a 125% tariff on many U.S. products in China. That's why Trump imposed a 125% tariff on some Chinese products.
No, "we" didn't "allow" anything. This mealy-mouthed trope is so absurd. You can't compete on wages with poorer nations, it is impossible, you compete by making higher level products, higher value products. Its why you take the kid out of the coal mine and turn him into a coder.What I know to be absurd is that kind of simplistic and, frankly, politics-driven, thinking. It's true that we have a largely service-based economy, and we used that rationale to allow our manufacturing base to fade.
Well....um......THATS THE FRIGGING POINT....But it's not necessary that it be one or the other. For example, nothing keeps us from smelting steel or aluminum except lower prices from other countries,
Their tariffs on our products does not cause their lower labor costs, thats all wrong. Rethink that.And why are their prices lower? Because of lower wages and our companies being blocked out of their markets by tariffs.
If we raised tariffs to match theirs, or they lowered theirs, steel and aluminum smelted here would come very close to the prices charged here by foreign smelters; at least close enough that dishwasher manufacturers could afford to use American steel.
It is going to be heavily subsidized, it funnels profits to SK, it will not produce steel competitive for export. All deals like this are done to avoid US import tariffs for US domestic consumption.As it happens, a South Korean company is spending $7 billion to build a steel smelting plant right here in the USA. in Louisiana. (Maybe they'll need some "fired D.C. planners" to learn to administer a steel-making business.)
Of course it is. Not an arithmetic correlation, but a financial one.That is not an argument of their correlation.
It doesn't have to be "direct." Your local car dealer might sell more cars if someone opened a new business employing people. There's no "direct" connection, but the two conditions affect each other. As for increasing income revenue, do you favor raising taxes on existing workers, or adding workers paying the same rates as existing workers? (NOTE: 500,000 people joined the work force last month, and 177,000 people got new jobs.)Which has nothing to do with trade or debt directly, AND YOU HAVE REJECTED INCREASING INCOME REVENUE AS A MEANS TO COUNTER DEBT IN PREVIOUS DEBATES.
First, I am not a "dude." Second, you clearly have no idea whats going on. You see increased tariffs and seem to think that's the object of the activity. Try considering the wider field of international trade, balances, our debt, the national economy, the government benefits you're used to. It's your style of tiny thinking that's put us at such a precarious position.Export demand? DUDE....we are engaging in a trade war, we are taking ourselves out of exporting, we are going to try to increase our domestic manufacturing for domestic consumption with tariffs, without subsidization, which makes our products completely uncompetitive for export in the first place. Further, other nations are going to block are exports with their tariffs on our uncompetative exports.
You don't know, do you?What in the **** are you talking about?
Sadly, you think of it in those terms.You just refuse to understand how insane this MAGA crap is.
Do you expect me to give you a run-down on the tariffs imposed by almost 200 countries? Look it up.OK......China maybe although you provide no specifics.......now let's talk about the rest of the world
There aren't even 200 countries...look it up. Most countries have low or no tariffs on US imports. There are always very specific sectors which have higher tariffs...just like the States does.Do you expect me to give you a run-down on the tariffs imposed by almost 200 countries? Look it up.
Of course we did. We accepted what we thought was a prestigious position of providing services instead of "mere hardware."No, "we" didn't "allow" anything.
Wait for it! You could be right! But only if you're talking about making the same products and only if tariffs are taken out of the pricing.You can't compete on wages with poorer nations, it is impossible
I'm sorry. You're so tied up in partisan crap that you can't possibly grasp what most people think of as the bigger picture. For example, let's consider the next exchange in this thread. I said, "And why are their prices lower? Because of lower wages and our companies being blocked out of their markets by tariffs." Your response was, "Their tariffs on our products does not cause their lower labor costs, thats all wrong."Well....um......THATS THE FRIGGING POINT....
There are 195., That's why I said, "almost 200."There aren't even 200 countries
If you know all that then you don't need an answer from me.Moat countries have low or no tariffs on US imports. There are always very specific sectors which have higher tariffs...just like the States does.
This is so stupidly tiresome, our participation rate is not going to change because foxcon opens an i-phone factory. The admin is arguing that degreed civil servants they fire are going to work at factories that do not exist. This entire argument is a pipe dream, it is Flavor-aide chugging, it has no basis in reality.Of course it is. Not an arithmetic correlation, but a financial one.
It doesn't have to be "direct." Your local car dealer might sell more cars if someone opened a new business employing people. There's no "direct" connection, but the two conditions affect each other. As for increasing income revenue, do you favor raising taxes on existing workers, or adding workers paying the same rates as existing workers? (NOTE: 500,000 people joined the work force last month, and 177,000 people got new jobs.)
Coulda sworn you were male, my bad.First, I am not a "dude."
You completely side-stepped away from the concept that other nations will apply tariffs in a trade war.....while telling me I need to understand international trade.Second, you clearly have no idea whats going on. You see increased tariffs and seem to think that's the object of the activity. Try considering the wider field of international trade, balances, our debt, the national economy, the government benefits you're used to. It's your style of tiny thinking that's put us at such a precarious position.
I was pointing out how the international markets are reacting to this insane brainless trade war. I'm not strictly relying upon it as an indicator of bad times ahead. But I get it, you are going to move the goalpost once again as you always do.You don't know, do you?
Sadly, you think of it in those terms.
A few weeks ago, you guys were all predicting doom and horrible gloom because the stock market took a crap. Today the Dow is just 2% lower than a month ago, 5,000 points higher than early April. Maybe something is going right in spite of you,
And how many of those have tariffs on American imports much less high ones? Do some homework before embarrassing yourself with Trump speak.There are 195., That's why I said, "almost 200."
You have created some fictional "we". Private corporation looked for cheaper labor, other nations with cheaper labor and subsidized production started exporting. Thats how the world turns, you can't reverse it.Of course we did. We accepted what we thought was a prestigious position of providing services instead of "mere hardware."
The conversation, your items..... were metalsWait for it! You could be right! But only if you're talking about making the same products and only if tariffs are taken out of the pricing.
Tariffs on our products.....does not cause.....their lower production costs, their "price" to be low. Thier lower cost of living causes the price of their product to be low. YOU are talking about the relative costs AFTER a tariff is applied, but their nominal price level is due to their lower cost of production. The price was lower before any tariff is applied. We cannot compete with poorer nations on a wages.I'm sorry. You're so tied up in partisan crap that you can't possibly grasp what most people think of as the bigger picture. For example, let's consider the next exchange in this thread. I said, "And why are their prices lower? Because of lower wages and our companies being blocked out of their markets by tariffs." Your response was, "Their tariffs on our products does not cause their lower labor costs, thats all wrong."
I referred to two factors: wages and tariffs. You thought I was saying that tariffs somehow cause low wages. Your reaction makes no sense. I don't know how to carry on a conversation with someone who does that.
No, but half a million people joined the labor force last month. IF that's part of a trend, it'll be substantially more than an iphone factory.This is so stupidly tiresome, our participation rate is not going to change because foxcon opens an i-phone factory.
What makes you think that all of the people fired from government have degrees?The admin is arguing that degreed civil servants they fire
I am male, but I am not a "dude."Coulda sworn you were male, my bad.
I "side-stepped" away from the obvious. And you need to understand trade and it's impact on domestic finances.You completely side-stepped away from the concept that other nations will apply tariffs in a trade war.....while telling me I need to understand international trade.
And I'm trying to help you understand that what's going on is not simply a trade war. You're having too much difficulty with that concept.I was pointing out how the international markets are reacting to this insane brainless trade war.
I KNOW THAT. And I haven't said that we should even try to. Let me know when something larger than that gets through to you.Let me know when you are able to recognize that the advanced US economy cannot compete on a wage basis with poorer nations on like products. Let me know when that sinks in
wow, I skipped over that gem, thats absurdly stupid.Not an arithmetic correlation, but a financial one.
You know some stuff, I'm sure. This just isn't it.wow, I skipped over that gem, thats absurdly stupid.
I have no idea what you are refencing, job growth came in at under 200K, and we are removing workers at an increasing rate.No, but half a million people joined the labor force last month. IF that's part of a trend, it'll be substantially more than an iphone factory.
Ah, ye olde absolutism and strawman....we've come to this.What makes you think that all of the people fired from government have degrees?
what the **** everI am male, but I am not a "dude."
I understand that this admin is not going to eliminate FIT with tariffs, or any other flavor-aide chugging insanity your lot repeats here.I "side-stepped" away from the obvious. And you need to understand trade and it's impact on domestic finances.
LOL...applying tariffs to end cheap imports...is not.....a trade war....chug chug.And I'm trying to help you understand that what's going on is not simply a trade war. You're having too much difficulty with that concept.
This entire exercise is a matter of stopping cheap imports...by....attempting to make their price rise above....domestic costs. It doesn't work, it is a pipe dream, it is flavor-aide chugging.I KNOW THAT. And I haven't said that we should even try to. Let me know when something larger than that gets through to you.
I would never say something stupid like "financial correlations are not arithmetic correlations ".You know some stuff, I'm sure. This just isn't it.
See? That's the trouble with this discussion., I didn't say that. You either think I did or just want to say that I did.I would never say something stupid like "financial correlations are not arithmetic correlations ".
That is a REALLY DUMB THING to say.
All countries do. You don't even know this do you.We've lived on the national credit card, and now it's time to pay the Piper.
No one has "declared war." If something has been "declared," it's that the field has to be leveled so that our products aren't kept from competing in other countries because of high tariffs.
Clue, this is a good thing.No. They sensibly took advantage of their much lower labor costs to make a wide variety of cheap products that we eagerly bought. They were so cheap that we stopped manufacturing those products and, eventually, lost our ability to make them. Now we don't even try to make them. American-designed products are shipped to Asia to be made, and the IP that goes with them is stolen.
So do a lot of people. And this country, like some people, has very nearly reached the point at which were going to have to stop doing things we want to because we have to pay the interest on our debt.All countries do. You don't even know this do you.
We could have, but the Biden administration (whoever they were) ignored it. They preferred to spend their time moving our government to the left. Trump knows that he only has two years that he can be sure of to try to get this effort done, so some of the niceties have to be short-circuited.We could have had a plan. We could have been reasoned.
Well, that certainly explains your pro-CCC position.Clue, this is a good thing.
Where did you get your degree in economics? Trump U?So do a lot of people. And this country, like some people, has very nearly reached the point at which were going to have to stop doing things we want to because we have to pay the interest on our debt.
e could have, but the Biden administration (whoever they were) ignored it. They preferred to spend their time moving our government to the left. Trump knows that he only has two years that he can be sure of to try to get this effort done, so some of the niceties have to be short-circuited.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?