• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

China’s Freedom Can Be Free --- An open letter to the United States

Zhao Ningkang

Banned
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
65
Reaction score
5
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
China’s Freedom Can Be Free
An open letter to American political leaders, scholars, journalists, and all citizens

People in the free world commonly believe in universal values: everybody is entitled to enjoy fundamental human rights. But people are split when the thing goes to whether they have an obligation to help those under the rule of dictators gain those rights: some say they have, and others say that’s the repressed people’s own business. This is not to say the later is hypocritical, only being sympathetic on lip service and would cower when it is needed for them to take some actual actions. That is not the case. The problem is rooted in how much price would have to be paid to help others gain liberation. It is understandable not to take action if the price is too high. Meanwhile, the repressed people can’t ask others to rescue them while the rescuers run the risk of lives.
That is to say, universal values are just immanent moral standards rather than code of conduct. People only take action due to their interests. I agree with this. In this open letter I ask the United States to do the deed according to its interests, not universal values.
There are two neighboring courtyards in the world. One is clean and the other is dirty. The dirty one is simply a cesspool. Unfortunate people are soaked in the pool and somebody drowns at any time. The two courtyards are the free world and the authoritarian world. Although people living in the free world don’t have to suffer the calamity, they often find flies and poisonous mosquitoes coming from the neighboring yard in their home. Flies stain their home and the mosquitoes attack them lethally at their unpreparedness. Helping clear the cesspool enables them to live in a not contaminated and secure environment. This is the United States’ interest.
Having resolved the problem of interest, the issue comes to price. Some may say, this interest is huge on the part of Chinese people and not very large on the part of Americans. We, Americans, only agree to pay a price not larger than the interest on our part.
I say, that’s enough. According to my tactic or strategy, the price needed for you to pay is very very small.
Some may say, come on. The histories of major democratic nations in the world have proven that freedom is not free. I say, that isn’t the way it works when the age comes to today. Today, it is real enough that freedom would be free.
Generally imaging, defeating a dictator needs to destroy his repressing tools. This needs a huge sacrifice of lives. But actually, things don’t go so. All the soldiers in the dictator’s army and armed police who open fire to civilians at the frontline of protests are offspring of the rank and file. Those who are put down are their own old folks. The soldiers are redeployed to here to suppress the local protest, while their own parents and siblings are being suppressed by their peers at their homeland. The populace who suffer brutal repression only because they resist the deprivation to their essential living condition aren’t mob making trouble out of nothing and damaging the social stability at all. And the soldiers themselves will be kicked away after retiring, becoming the same pauper as those who was suppressed by them.
Having no use for civil war, not having to sacrifice many lives to resolve this army, what needs to do is just to tell them these facts. Having known these facts, they will no longer willingly serve as the tools of dictator. Whether they would turn renegade immediately or not, the repressing tools have been disintegrated essentially.
Except for violent repression, concealing and cheating are also among the CCP’s tools to maintain its rule. It does all kinds of evil while blocks the passage of informations, not rendering others know its villainy, and simultaneously, endeavoring to propagate that it is serving wholeheartedly for the people. It has developed sophisticated deceitful tricks since it come into being, and until now, many still believe that it’s good men. Those who are cheated constitute to be the important social basis for it to continuously exist.
What needed to enlighten these people is still just facts. Fortunately, the CCP itself is proactively providing us so many facts appropriate to enlightenment. It has lost all sense of shame. It has been too unscrupulous to care about how evident its lies are. When a high-speed train crashed in Wenzhou, it buried in haste the locomotive which carried the most important evidences of the accident and coaches in which there are even unsaved passengers. In a terrible fire burned down a bustling shopping mall in Jixian, Tianjin, and more horrified is that the outlets for customers to evacuate had been locked for fear of loss of goods, it claimed that only a few person died. In the roundup for a wanted killer in Chongqing, a policeman participating the action is killed by mistake; it determined that the killed was just the wanted. Their lies are full of flaws. Our question to them can start with these evident flaws. They have to work out more and more lies to make the previous lies plausible. The more lies they make, the more flaws will be exposed. The flaws manifesting its true feature is most lifesome teaching material for the fooled people.
The truth is the most powerful weapon. We now have the Internet. When this weapon, not censored or monitored, is sent to the hands of every civilian, the cost of blood will be no longer needed for gaining freedom. Back in the day, it is nearly an illusion to say that freedom is free. But today, only to say freedom is free is more accordant to the new situation.
What needed to destroy China’s dictatorship is only the dissemination of truth, having no use for force against it. But this is not a matter simple enough for Chinese people themselves to accomplish independently. Chinese people need help here. The help needed by Chinese people is tools to spread truth. Chinese people don’t need the help of your advanced heavy weapons, because it is not that the enemy of Chinese people can only be defeated by those sophisticated weapons. The facts and principles that are said earlier and needed to be known by soldiers, the facts and truth that needed to be known by fooled people --- questions to the Communist party officials, their answers, the Party’s true features disclosed by the questions and answers, are required to be transmitted to the recipients through effective and handy tools. In addition, when brave ones stand out to call the unashamed liars to account and hence are likely persecuted by the Party, you are required to exert pressure on it to protect them from being injured. The CCP’s official suppressing apparatuses are disorganized due to informing the truth, while its secret and ignoble persecuting means have to be held back because of your severe intimidation. Thus, after the first brave person stepping forward, more and more people knowing truth but formerly being afraid follow to disclose more and more truth. Seeing these truth, fooled people wake up to reality and no longer work as the foundation of the CCP’s rule. So the huge corrupt edifice collapses.
This tactic or strategy doesn’t require you to resort to a single bullet and doesn’t sacrifice a single American young man or woman’s life. Starting from the United States’ interests, we acquire the harvest of eliminating the dictatorship in China. It is not a fantasy play. It is something long overdue but Americans always cannot recognize its reality. Inflammable firewood is already deployed by Chinese people, what needed you to do is just igniting it. This is a strategy to pry a huge stone with a lever. Implementing it, the forward motion of worldwide democratic progress will get rid of the stagnation since the beginning of the twenty-first century, and the neoconservative will free themselves from the awkwardness yielding in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are heroes to put others out of misery and they deserve praises and eulogization rather than doubts. Their beliefs are right. Every human heart desires to be free. Nobody is willing to be enslaved. There is only imposed dictatorship but no imposed democracy. The demand for democracy is inherent, but the power to help clear the blocks to democratic progress may come from outside. Proper strategy would render democratic progresses in authoritarian nations, even in a nation as large as China be, go like splitting a piece of bamboo rather than though troubled times.
Questioning which starts the democratic progress in China not only points to the flaws of their lies, but also certainly touches the whereabouts of huge amount of properties and money. Embezzling public and private properties is the most pervasive type of crimes the ruling group committed , and tracing where a specific sum of money is going or where it comes is the most convenient access for the civilians to build the sense of democracy. No matter how devoid of democratic tradition a authoritarian nation is, this method is most direct, simplest, and most applicative. The public lack of enthusiasm for democracy is because in reality they cannot see the hope that the robbed properties can be retrieved. To live better, some would rather join the ranks of thieves with competitive desires. Once the possibilities emerge that thieves’ acts of larceny are exposed, traced and liquidated, the public values transform immediately. By this time, everyone’s sense of democracy emerges spontaneously with no need for preaching theory of democracy to the public. The revealed truth make one recognize that the Party thugs not only robbed his own property, but robbed the whole country. The voice to liquidate them forms huge pressure, making them not to be able to resist. America’s action in Iraq didn’t cope well with the resistance of the remanent dictator power, leading to a too large price of yours; in China, this situation will not happen. The CCP is a thief accustomed to shading the sun to facilitate his larceny in the dark. When the lid it set to shade the sun is removed, it will be grappled under the sun, together with the stolen goods, with the presence of the owner of the goods, and it are surrounded by the police. At this time, it is unimaginable for it to have enough courage to resist. Not to mention the advanced equipments in the hands of police and the angry roaring of the owners of the lost properties, only the sunlight it never dare to see could dazzle it so heavily that it couldn’t even open its eyes. There are always news that malfeasants commit suicide for fear of punishment when they get wind of their being investigated. The CCP has so impressive resilience facing the programs of democratic promotion issued by the U. S., but when it faces calling to account, tracing along the clues and liquidation, they can only choose to capitulate and surrender early.
(to be continued)
 
(continued)
Take actions from now on, Americans. Don’t hesitate any more.
Don’t feel that it is passable to leave the CCP alone for, after all, it is no longer the desperado features as Mao Zedong is; and after all, it now focuses on economy. Don’t be confused by it. If there is any difference between Deng Xiaoping and Mao, it must be the method to get pleasure. Mao got it from killing people discretionarily; while Deng from sucking blood. And as a possibility emerges that it couldn’t continuously suck blood, it would kill people with no scruple to maintain its privilege for hematophagia. The Tiananmen Square massacre is the exposure of its real face which you shouldn’t forget. It is sanguinary and is always the same, ever since it appeared. In the so-called “land reform”, it not only robbed all the land and properties of the rich people, but also hanged them on the top of “the pole on which to look out on Chiang Kai-shek” and spilled them to the ground heavily, in order to let Chiang Kai-shek watching his people were robbed and killed. Today, if someone tries to force the CCP with self-burning from tearing down his house, it will let him alone to be burnt. If someone tries to resist, it will push him down under the wheel of a heavy truck and run over him.
Don’t feel that the CCP has terrible power. Its economy consists of tinpot steel and cement. Using these inferior materials, it continuously builds and demolishes the crudely made structures, finally making a mass of rubbish. Its GDP is striking, but it is just the diametric measurement of the arm of the swelled body of a drowned person having been soaked so long. It is not the same thing as that of a strong man at all. The world pays close attention on its economy because this “economy” influence world economy greatly. But this influence is by no means good one. It exhausts all the resource in China and then goes to guzzle the resource of the world. It is a black hole for resources. It turns the precious resources into meaningless carbon emission. The world shouldn’t encourage this behavior and shouldn’t seek immoral petty profits from the trade with it, but should stop it. With the same essence as its economy, its military is also so rotten. In this military, every expenditure is for a sum of kickback too, and every rank’s promotion is bought with cash, and those who have been promoted must calculate how much longer it will take to recoup the investment through promoting his lower ranks. It’s very wrong to say that such a military has any combat effectiveness.
Don’t doubt whether Chinese people have the ability to administrate their country well. The embrace to freedom makes the whole country operate in healthy ways. Ensure everyone’s freedom, ensure everyone’s rights to buy freely, produce freely, and sell freely. If someone tries to benefit through encroaching and damaging others, the state apparatus are built to stop him.
In a free country, people is happy, while they treat others peacefully. I approve of democratic peace theory. Some say this theory isn’t always right because the dictators may also be obedient, not going to start a war. Yes, you can believe that the CCP won’t start a war. Of course a group of gluttonous hogs whose most desired thing is to sell the country they control has no ability to start a war. But they support terrorism. It cannot contend against the U. S. with a war. It can only distract America using the supports to the terrorism to brace a space for itself to live. Dictatorship doesn’t mean wars anymore, it now means terror. Democratic peace theory evolves to democratic security theory. To pursue the security of America and the peace of the world, please support China’s freedom. Please help China implement the great change with your easy work.
 
China’s Freedom Can Be Free
An open letter to American political leaders, scholars, journalists, and all citizens......

Dear joker,

Fortunately, you still have the sense not to ask Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta to pass your letter to the Chinese leaders during their visit to China.

Just look at the photo in the link below. Leon Panetta was enjoying his lunch with young Chinese officers and cadets in the mess hall at the PLA Engineering Academy of Armored Forces in Beijing.

If the Chinese leaders received your letter from Leon Panetta, the Pentagon chief would have to take his lunch at a roadside stall.

Don't try to rock the boat. The Chinese government and the US administration are in the same boat. As a saying goes, "If you cannot beat them, join them."

Leon Panetta to China: we need to talk
 
Last edited:

I am not a joker. I am serious.
Don’t examine my views from the status quo. My purpose is just changing it.
By the way, I protest you for saying that Mr. Panetta friendly treat Chinese official for not having to take his lunch at a roadside stall. I protest you representing Mr. Panetta. (when doing this, I am a joker.)
If the US changes its ways to support human rights and democracy in the world, the situation will be utterly turned over. The US needs to change its supports from national level to personal level, meaning that the US should no longer focus its supports on trade, investments, village elections, the rule of law, instead, provide urgently needed help to those who are suffering terrible oppression. The victims’ situations in authoritarian nations are too tragic for Americans to imagine. The helps to them can be understood by the ordinary people, can distinguish good men and bad guys in local people, can sweep away the slander and vilification the dictators splashed on the U.S., can expose the crimes the dictators has perpetrated and is perpetrating, can isolate the dictators, can enable your leaders say what they want to say while not fear to annoy dictators, can avoid the money of American tax payers from coming into the pockets of evil, can clear the hate to America in some people’s mind, can preliminarily yield concept of rights and gradually establish a democracy society.
The saying you used to persuaded me seems to be able to reveal your identity. That saying is a principle the CCP used to numb Chinese people and not an idea of Americans.
 
Don’t examine my views from the status quo. My purpose is just changing it....

Please answer the following three questions.

(A) Describe in details the steps you take to change your so-called status quo without outside help.

(B) Suppose you are the US President, describe in details the steps you take to help change your so-called status quo in China.

(C) Suppose you were shot in the head by your enemy, resulting in a bullet embedded deep in your brain. If you didn't remove the bullet, you would feel uncomfortable with headache every day. If you removed the bullet, your life would be in danger. Tell me how you would deal with the bullet problem.
 
Last edited:
1. There is not a way to change the status quo without outside help. Calling for the U.S.’s help is the reason I wrote this letter. Mentioning a point I had written: to help Chinese people is in the U.S.’ interest.
2. The steps needed to take are simple, most important among them is helping the person who are suffering terrible oppression. As I mentioned, turn the foreign aids from national level to personal level. For example, to help Qian Yunhui, get a access to justice.
3. Your third question has a premise that when a tumor on China’s body is cut, the nation will be still diseased. It’s not so. The healed China will be healthy. The sequelae of democratized nations are due to the not so perfect methods to democratize them. Yet my strategy is trying to provide a good one. If the ruling class is reasonable, they should accept China’s transformation. If you have relations to them, please persuade them.
 
I am not a joker. I am serious....

Serious? A criminal can be serious; a terrorist can be serious; a dreamer can be serious; a psychopath can be serious ...... therein lies the danger of being serious.

By the way, I protest you for saying that Mr. Panetta friendly treat Chinese official for not having to take his lunch at a roadside stall. I protest you representing Mr. Panetta. (when doing this, I am a joker.).......

Don't be jealous. As the saying goes, "The cat will mew and dog will have his day." If you become the Chinese President one day, not only the Pentagon chief but the US President will also join you for lunch. By then, don't forget to invite me, a poor man, to lunch too.

Every dog has its day


Henry Kissinger, the 56th US Secretary of State, espoused the geopolitical maxim in the 1970s that "America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests". Your letter shows nothing but ignorance and naiveness. Just wait patiently until you become the Chinese President, then you will become a friend to serve America's interests.

From now onwards, I place a a small stake on you, calling you "future Chinese President Zhao Ningkang", hoping that I, a poor man, will be rewarded with a small post in your future government.

Henry Kissinger

The U.S. Has No Friends, Only Interests by Tom Chartier

....The saying you used to persuaded me seems to be able to reveal your identity. That saying is a principle the CCP used to numb Chinese people and not an idea of Americans.

Once again, your words expose your ignorance, future Chinese President Zhao. The popular adage “if you cannot beat them, join them” was attributed to US Senator James Eli Watson. You claim that it is a principle the CCP. If your claim is true, US Senator James Eli Watson might have some secret connection with the CCP. He could even be a secret founder of the CCP.

Who said the popular adage: “if you cannot beat them join them”? - Yahoo! Answers

James Eli Watson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
Ignoring your meaningless words, I only respond meaningful ones.
Henry Kissinger, a genuine friend of the CCP, his remarks should not be taken as a judgment standard. Furthermore, I have said, my opinion is consistent with America’s interests.
To be frank, I don’t know Senator James Watson said that adage. But it is assuredly not in American values. It does represent a deceitful trick used by the CCP to numb Chinese people. Maybe the Senator said it in special circumstance. I think few Americans say so when they face the evil powers.
 
Why on earth would anyone write an open letter to the USA regarding freedom?

The USA is an undemocratic oligarchical fascist corpocratic tyranny that not only enslaves the bulk of its population but employs its military to export this insanity to other countries

Surely this thread topic is a piece on sarcasm?
 
You seem to be a wee bit confused. America is not a Democracy - America is a Republic. There is a difference.

The Constitution says "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." The founding fathers feared democracy...

In the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton wrote "Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."

James Madison wrote "In a democracy, where a multitude of people exercise in person the legislative functions, and are continually exposed, by their incapacity for regular deliberation and concerted measures, to the ambitious intrigues of their executive magistrates, tyranny may well be apprehended, on some favorable emergency, to start up in the same quarter."

When you recite the Pledge of Allegiance, it does not say: "I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Democracy for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

In a Democracy, the majority rules. We have a representative form of government - a Republic. In America, the majority does not rule - four Presidents won the majority vote, including Al Gore, but lost the election.
 
four Presidents won the majority vote, including Al Gore, but lost the election.

Correction: Four presidential candidates won the majority vote, including Al Gore, but lost the election.

While I'm here, if you'd like a better distinction between a Democracy and a Republic from a Founding Father, read James Madison's Federalist Paper #10, beginning with "A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking. Let us examine the points in which it varies from pure democracy, and we shall comprehend both the nature of the cure and the efficacy which it must derive from the Union. "
 
Hahaha, well played.
 
Zhao Ningkang, I'm a little confused about what you're saying the American people should do to help bring about individual liberty in China. Can you help me understand your argument? You are absolutely correct in saying that, [for a democratic revolution to be possible] "The help needed by Chinese people is tools to spread truth". At one point, you might be saying that these tools are primarily forms of communication, but then, you also say these already exist. You might also say that these tools are merely the education of the Chinese people, but there we run into the biggest problem, I think. What can Americans do about chinese education? There are several forms of communication that may contribute to education, including:
1. Schooling
2. Media
3. Social Networking
Of which you seem to fixate on the third, of course. Reasonable, since Americans really can't do anything about the first and second. So we come to the problems with the third. The third assumes that education can take place in which one person takes a relevant piece of information and shares it with another. That works great within a single country, where ideas have a common context and philosophical base--and a common language. A national consciousness is a very complex philosophical topic, and I know enough about Chinese culture to know that it is very, very different from American culture and even different from Chinese-American culture, which also doesn't quite mesh into American culture (understandably, given its history of oppression in America). Of course there are topics that individuals can all talk about, but raise the numbers and diversify the base on both sides, and the differences in both the unique assumptions and unique ignorances on both sides become apparent. Americans, on average, do not understand what the people of China, on average, really think about anything. (Hell, I don't, and to be even thinking about it makes me a minority in this country). There is not common context or philosophical base to make progress as easily as you seem to think. Then, as I mentioned, there's a language barrier--can you provide a statistic for how many people in mainland China speak English? I don't know, I'd be interested in knowing what you know on that. In America, about 0.6% of Americans speak some form of Chinese. 2 million people, sure. May or may not be significant, I don't know, but there *is* a language barrier. But now let's consider the type of information they would actually share. Relevant information. What is relevant to Chinese citizens, and how would Americans know this? Another one: the baseline education of the Chinese citizen receiving the information--do they have the necessary academic background to understand the content? And one final barrier I will present to you: is the information that someone may share actually true? And if so, does the recipient have the ability to filter a reliable source from an unreliable one? This is now a growing problem in America because of both biased and nonprofessional media sources.

Now a basic exercise in statistics. What is the probability of overcoming the cultural barrier, the language barrier, the "local relevance" barrier, the baseline education barrier, the barrier of biased or nonfactual sources, and finally resulting in improved education from any American citizen to any Chinese citizen? Let's do hand-wavy math and just say "pretty low".

Now, American "citizens" was only the last addressed recipient of your open letter. Addressing "American political leaders, scholars, journalists" on this problem could indeed be more effective--especially scholars in my opinion, but maybe that's just my personal preference :> But then, the basic problem you run into--beyond the language barrier and cultural barrier, of course, is: Would the people of China listen? That's an open question to you, as I don't know the answer. Would they? Consider how each recipient group of your letter would go about doing this in your answer, and how their methods might be received.

Or, did I misunderstand your argument completely? Let's talk.

EDIT: American scholars writing to Chinese scholars could be effective somehow; I mean, scholarly exchange of ideas is where the CCP got its roots anyway, isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Gavinfielder, thank you so much for your reply.
What the Chinese people need includes moral and powerful supports to protect them from being persecuted when they stand out to discover the CCP’s crimes and to confront with the CCP, besides the tools to transfer information. The two things are enough to override the evil one.
I refer to the flow of information as within Chinese people. Ordinary people, the soldiers of the CCP’s repressing tools, need to know how bad the CCP is. Of course there is a problem whether the information someone shares is actually true. But we can argue, confront, raise questions, ponder over circumstantial evidence, examine whether he speak coherently, just like attending a court session. American people can watch the process to judge if it goes in healthy way.
The cultures of our two nations are very different, but what I want American people to understand is so fundamental that they should fully support the most basic living condition that Chinese people don’t have. Most recently, in Hunan province, a villager whose land and house were damaged in a highway project was crushed by a road roller under the order of a deputy-chief of the town when he argued with the official. Americans should understand such events. The largest barrier obstructing them to understand such events is their goodness. A kind-hearted person cannot imagine so evil actions. Even if they have heard such events, they don’t be willing to recognize that such events are deriving from the Party’s essential.
Due to the overwhelming advantage in science and technology, Americans don’t have incentives to learn foreign language. That’s reasonable. But it has a consequence that they don’t have enough sources about the CCP’s crimes. And hence they miss a vital factor threatening their lives: the CCP is actually the backstage supporter of the terrorism. Look at the relations between Al-Qaeda, Pakistan, and Beijing.
The channels for information to flow already exist in China, but they are disabled. On the Internet, users are monitored and censored. Some information is flowing, but it is controlled in the dictator’s hands. They can control the flow in a innocuous scope. The sensational news often flow in not so popular medias. On the more popular medias such as TV screens, the CCP will never allow a dissent word. Furthermore, they can shut up the flow at any time. And imagine if many Chinese can read English. If so, the English websites will be also shut down.
And I know that the US is developing devices to break through the Internet censorship. Thank the Secretary of State, thank the New American Foundation. What I want to tell the US leaders is that we should still have a overarching plan to manage the progress of China’s democratization, with the help of this device.
Even in schooling and media, the U.S. has enough reasons to intervene. Because the CCP made so many rumors against the U.S. in these areas. To defend itself against the rumors is also the best reason for the U.S. to present this tool to Chinese people.
Have I made myself clear? I look forward more discussion.
 


Oh good Lawd.

There are no words. None that won't get me in trouble anyway.
 
Can you summarize the open letter in two lines, then I will know what you are talking about.
 
Can you summarize the open letter in two lines, then I will know what you are talking about.

What the Chinese people ask for from the U.S. includes the tools to transfer information and moral and powerful supports to protect them from being persecuted when they stand out to discover the CCP’s crimes and to confront with the CCP. The two things are enough to override the evil one.
 

Where is your location now if I may ask.
 

See, this is what "shtick" is.
 
See, this is what "shtick" is.

I see - thanks for clearing that up

I wish I could be like you and be on here for almost 8 years and not rely on a "shtick" (whatever that means)

At least you have a star trek avatar - you 3 bonus points for that, but you have a long way to go
 
Dear Zhao,

If you have your way, we will no longer be able to get great deals at Wal-Mart.
 
I see - thanks for clearing that up

I wish I could be like you and be on here for almost 8 years and not rely on a "shtick" (whatever that means)

At least you have a star trek avatar - you 3 bonus points for that, but you have a long way to go

Not very good at math, either, are you?

Haven't even been for 7. Heck, there's a number 6 here:

<---------------------------------------------------

A handy guide.
"Bonus points." :lamo As though you have any to hand out.
 
Hmm. It seems to me that the only thing Americans would need to accomplish this is awareness of specific human rights abuses. You used a 'we' in a sentence that suggests you actually live in America, so I'm guessing you are familiar with Joseph Kony and the movement instigated by Jason Russell that spurred a lot of discussion on the Lord's Resistance Army in central Africa. Short-lived, certainly, but that one video took the nation's consciousness by storm, it was quite the spectacle to watch my entire circle go OMGWTF*TEAR* and then the next day we see a widespread backfire of skeptics, primarily of Invisible Children, Inc., which eventually drove the company's perception to obscurity. But the point I want to make is that Americans are especially affected by human interest stories in which specific examples of rights abuses are shown and effectively spread. The Trayvon Martin case is another good example of this.

I'm still not sure if getting involved in internal Chinese affairs would be good for the whole of America to do, but I think somehow establishing greater media coverage in which information can be easily transmitted from China to the US would go a long way in developing a broader interest in human rights in China.

EDIT: Relevant to that, where did you hear about this villager in Hunan?

Also, I don't believe that "the relations between Al-Qaeda, Pakistan, and Beijing." show that China supports terrorism. I've always been told that China supports Pakistan because it doesn't like India. Feel free to show me countering sources. And just because Al Qaeda is involved in Pakistan does not mean Pakistan is a bridge between China and Al Qaeda. Feel free to elaborate on this, but I'm really skeptical on your claim there.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…