Child Support

[Henrin]

So you agree. Both my SiLs have done it.

This is going to sound really ignorant, but what does SiLs mean?

 

[Henrin]

Then let fear rule your life. Don't get the facts.

I explained to procedure pretty clearly. It's not difficult to understand. I said nothing which indicated that the reversing process was difficult and likely to not work or function differently than prior to the procedure. I am saying quite the opposite.

Don't know how my post could be confusing to you...but then again...it's not unlike you to be adversarial about things you don't have a clue about.

Where did I say I was afraid of anything? Maybe I just don't want my nutsack cut up and have bodily functions removed. Maybe I find emulating myself in such a fashion to be stupid and undesirable and maybe, just maybe, I don't think doctors putting my body back together in a way it wasn't when they cut into me is really reversing what they did. Maybe I'm just against genital mutilation and having it done to me. I know, how shocking.

 

[Removable Mind]

I explained some of my experience in this very thread.

Any particular post #

 

[Removable Mind]

Where did I say I was afraid of anything? Maybe I just don't want my nutsack cut up and have bodily functions removed. Maybe I find emulating myself in such a fashion to be stupid and undesirable and maybe, just maybe, I don't think doctors putting my body back together in a way it wasn't when they cut into me is really reversing what they did. Maybe I'm just against genital mutilation and having it done to me. I know, how shocking.

What a hoot! Genital Mutation!

The procedure doesn't even leave a scar. You have zero symptoms that it's been performed.

More voodoo thinking. :roll:

 

[Henrin]

What a hoot! Genital Mutation!

The procedure doesn't even leave a scar. You have zero symptoms that it's been performed.

More voodoo thinking. :roll:

Look up the definition of the word and get back to me. The word fits perfectly with what the operation does. Deal with it.

 

[Thumper]

Any particular post #

Not a clue. My brain is already full of enough information. I dont memorize everything from every post in here.

 

[WCH]

This is going to sound really ignorant, but what does SiLs mean?

Son in laws

 

[Removable Mind]

Look up the definition of the word and get back to me. The word fits perfectly with what the operation does. Deal with it.

Cling to fear, Henrin. Nobody will force you.

 

[Henrin]

Cling to fear, Henrin. Nobody will force you.

Have you actually looked up the term I used? Do you need help with the definition?

genital mutilation- any type of cutting or removal of all or some of the genital organs, especially excision of the clitoris.

On a side note, it's bit retarded that when you look up the word on google the first result is about FGM.

 

[Bodi]

On a side note, it's bit retarded that when you look up the word on google the first result is about FGM.

Actually 7 of the 10 are specifically about FGM and the other 3 about about both genders... not one about MGM only.

 

[Removable Mind]

Have you actually looked up the term I used? Do you need help with the definition?

genital mutilation- any type of cutting or removal of all or some of the genital organs, especially excision of the clitoris.

On a side note, it's bit retarded that when you look up the word on google the first result is about FGM.

You've changed to topic from vasectomy to genital mutation. If you need that term to condemn the utility of vasectomies, which are a safe and reliable means of birth control for men - then cling to that with all your might. Keep your nuts as far away from physicians who perform such procedures.

 

[Henrin]

You've changed to topic from vasectomy to genital mutation. If you need that term to condemn the utility of vasectomies, which are a safe and reliable means of birth control for men - then cling to that with all your might. Keep your nuts as far away from physicians who perform such procedures.

I did not. I used the term to describe the operation and then you decided to make it the focus of discussion.

 

[Removable Mind]

I did not. I used the term to describe the operation and then you decided to make it the focus of discussion.

Another circle jerk exchange.

 

[Bodi]

Another circle jerk exchange.

I have been reading this exchange and no... it is not a circle jerk nor did he change the topic. You said vasectomy and he merely called that procedure genital mutilation. You then got in a bit of a hissy about it when it should have been no big deal at all. *shrugs*

 

[Henrin]

Son in laws

Well, a lot of men mutilate themselves for their wives. Not much else to say about that.

 

[GEIxBattleRifle]

I have been reading this exchange and no... it is not a circle jerk nor did he change the topic. You said vasectomy and he merely called that procedure genital mutilation. You then got in a bit of a hissy about it when it should have been no big deal at all. *shrugs*

There was a thread on this made in the past made by a poster who has been banned months ago (Gathomas.)

 

[WCH]

Well, a lot of men mutilate themselves for their wives. Not much else to say about that.

My oldest daughter had two pregnancies from Hell and the youngest only wanted one child. I can see their points.

 

[Removable Mind]

I have been reading this exchange and no... it is not a circle jerk nor did he change the topic. You said vasectomy and he merely called that procedure genital mutilation. You then got in a bit of a hissy about it when it should have been no big deal at all. *shrugs*

You've become quite a Henrin logic fan. Good on you Bod. And that does explain some of your responses.

But for the record, I won't ever agree that a vasectomy, which is highly accepted medical procedure and a viable form of birth control, is actually genital mutilation, or self-mutilation, which probably Henrin's next claim.

Gathomas made this same argument over the course of dozens of posts to no avail.

Rather than Henrin researching a valid medical source and sharing a professional definition of Vasectomy, he resorts to the Kenyan Terrorist Guide on Performing Torture to obtain his definition, which he "needs " it to be associated with a form of human brutality to attempt to derail the actual intent of vasectomies, which actually takes surgical skills rather than cutting someone's balls off or using a melon scooper to scrape out a woman's clitoris.

Sadly this isn't the only time that you've used one of Henrin's nonsensical posts to unnecessarily take a jab at me...as a personal vendetta over your misguided perceptions of the perspectives that I have about men's reproductive rights. If you actually buy Henrin's definition, then I have way, way overestimated your capacity to engage in a civil discussion.

 

[Henrin]

You've become quite a Henrin logic fan. Good on you Bod. And that does explain some of your responses.

Everyone is a fan of my logic. Some people are just in denial about it. :mrgreen:

But for the record, I won't ever agree that a vasectomy, which is highly accepted medical procedure and a viable form of birth control, is actually genital mutilation, or self-mutilation, which probably Henrin's next claim.

Well, it is by definition, so...

Oh and self mutilation is something you do to yourself, not hire someone to do for you.

Gathomas made this same argument over the course of dozens of posts to no avail.

He won that argument handily against many different opponents.

Rather than Henrin researching a valid medical source and sharing a professional definition of Vasectomy, he resorts to the Kenyan Terrorist Guide on Performing Torture to obtain his definition, which he "needs " it to be associated with a form of human brutality to attempt to derail the actual intent of vasectomies, which actually takes surgical skills rather than cutting someone's balls off or using a melon scooper to scrape out a woman's clitoris.

Do you think the word genital mutilation speaks towards torture only? It doesn't you know. You also don't appear to know much about the history of FGM or how it is done. Just sayin'.

Sadly this isn't the only time that you've used one of Henrin's nonsensical posts to unnecessarily take a jab at me...as a personal vendetta over your misguided perceptions of the perspectives that I have about men's reproductive rights. If you actually buy Henrin's definition, then I have way, way overestimated your capacity to engage in a civil discussion.

It's not my definition.

 

[Removable Mind]

Everyone is a fan of my logic. Some people are just in denial about it. :mrgreen:

Well, it is by definition, so...

Oh and self mutilation is something you do to yourself, not hire someone to do for you.

He won that argument handily against many different opponents.

Do you think the word genital mutilation speaks towards torture only? It doesn't you know. You also don't appear to know much about the history of FGM or how it is done. Just sayin'.

It's not my definition.

Your persistence to attempt to distort, distract, and derail posts of the vast majority of members based on your perceptions of virtually every topic that can be posted in every Forum in DP...isn't an attribute that I have any admiration for. But you're entitled, like all members, to express your views and opinions, which are usually baffling.

Gathomas' rants about genital mutilation were as phony as the rumors that the Pope wears pink panties under his dress. He won a ticket out of DP. That's about it.

 

[Henrin]

Your persistence to attempt to distort, distract, and derail posts of the vast majority of members based on your perceptions of virtually every topic that can be posted in every Forum in DP...isn't an attribute that I have any admiration for. But you're entitled, like all members, to express your views and opinions, which are usually baffling.

People are not having their argument distorted when they are shown to be wrong.

Gathomas' rants about genital mutilation were as phony as the rumors that the Pope wears pink panties under his dress. He won a ticket out of DP. That's about it.

He got banned from DP months after that thread.

 

[Bodi]

You've become quite a Henrin logic fan. Good on you Bod. And that does explain some of your responses.

But for the record, I won't ever agree that a vasectomy, which is highly accepted medical procedure and a viable form of birth control, is actually genital mutilation, or self-mutilation, which probably Henrin's next claim.

Gathomas made this same argument over the course of dozens of posts to no avail.

Rather than Henrin researching a valid medical source and sharing a professional definition of Vasectomy, he resorts to the Kenyan Terrorist Guide on Performing Torture to obtain his definition, which he "needs " it to be associated with a form of human brutality to attempt to derail the actual intent of vasectomies, which actually takes surgical skills rather than cutting someone's balls off or using a melon scooper to scrape out a woman's clitoris.

Sadly this isn't the only time that you've used one of Henrin's nonsensical posts to unnecessarily take a jab at me...as a personal vendetta over your misguided perceptions of the perspectives that I have about men's reproductive rights. If you actually buy Henrin's definition, then I have way, way overestimated your capacity to engage in a civil discussion.

How does accepting a definition to a term affect my ability to be civil in conversation?

 

[Removable Mind]

People are not having their argument distorted when they are shown to be wrong.



He got banned from DP months after that thread.

In the context of the topic of birth control - you're just as wrong as Gathomas. His opinion that vasectomies are genital mutilation is an example of his extremist religious beliefs. I have no idea where you derive your beliefs that a vasectomy is genital mutilation - except to simply inject an nonsensical, disruptive comment for completely inappropriate reasons.

Vasectomies play a significant role in preventing men winding up in family court faced with paying child support for an unwanted kid. You do realize that after conception men virtually have no rights.

According to you people should live a self-wii-run-riot existence and when it comes to the production of unwanted kids, meh, they're on their own - virtually feral beings.

So in essence, you are supporting the inequalities in reproductive rights for men by your adverseral beliefs that vasectomies are genital mutilation...and discourage men from seriously considering such a contraceptive method when there is an abundant of positive studies about this medical procedure.

 

[Henrin]

In the context of the topic of birth control - you're just as wrong as Gathomas. His opinion that vasectomies are genital mutilation is an example of his extremist religious beliefs. I have no idea where you derive your beliefs that a vasectomy is genital mutilation - except to simply inject an nonsensical, disruptive comment for completely inappropriate reasons.

I get my opinion that vasectomies are genital mutilation from the definition of the term genital mutilation. lol. As for Gath, well, he got his understanding of the subject from the definition too. It's funny how that works, ain't it?

Vasectomies play a significant role in preventing men winding up in family court faced with paying child support for an unwanted kid. You do realize that after conception men virtually have no rights.

Yes, yes, men should mutilate themselves and remove bodily function to avoid the law. Great advice.

According to you people should live a self-wii-run-riot existence and when it comes to the production of unwanted kids, meh, they're on their own - virtually feral beings.

Never said that actually.

So in essence, you are supporting the inequalities in reproductive rights for men by your adverseral beliefs that vasectomies are genital mutilation...and discourage men from seriously considering such a contraceptive method when there is an abundant of positive studies about this medical procedure.

Nope, I'm promoting the idea that you don't solve human right violations by the government by mutilating yourself. Oh and yes, I advise people in general to not mutilate themselves. It's a consistent thing that I do for both men and women.

 

[Bodi]

In the context of the topic of birth control - you're just as wrong as Gathomas. His opinion that vasectomies are genital mutilation is an example of his extremist religious beliefs. I have no idea where you derive your beliefs that a vasectomy is genital mutilation - except to simply inject an nonsensical, disruptive comment for completely inappropriate reasons.

According to you people should live a self-wii-run-riot existence and when it comes to the production of unwanted kids, meh, they're on their own - virtually feral beings.

So in essence, you are supporting the inequalities in reproductive rights for men by your adverseral beliefs that vasectomies are genital mutilation...and discourage men from seriously considering such a contraceptive method when there is an abundant of positive studies about this medical procedure.

How are you even connecting G.M. with birth control? I am seriously puzzled how you arrived at that.

He made a comment that a vasectomy is GM. That is it. You can disagree with the definition if you like but that doesn't mean that a vasectomy is not a form of GM. It also doesn't mean that GM has anything to do with birth control.

Vasectomies play a significant role in preventing men winding up in family court faced with paying child support for an unwanted kid. You do realize that after conception men virtually have no rights.

So you admit that there are unequal rights. Do you also know that denying equal rights is illegal under the Constitution of the United States?