• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Charlie Kirk wasn't racist or hateful- prove me wrong

Kyrion said:
Charlie Kirk was clearly a racist since the grifter tactic of going to colleges to rile up the students as a means to gain media attention and thus fundraise off of was first invented by a dudebro named George Lincoln Rockwell. GLR was an unashamed and loud and proud racist to an extreme intent. GLR was the dudebro that invented the term white power. He invented Holocaust denial. He slandered MLK Jr. by calling him a stooge for the Jews. He thought loudly that psychiatry was a Jewish conspiracy. GLR was the first to understand that if you want to generate mass appeal for fascism you have to not call it fascism and instead you use race and religious arguments to stupid and bigoted white Americans. Which is a tactic that conservatives use to this day.

"The color of your skin is your uniform in this ultimate battle for the survival of the West." - GLR.


The fun part is that the parallels to GLR and Kirk extend further with how both were murdered by people who followed and paid attention to his words. History repeats.
Click to expand...

I'm not following your train of thought. Can you clarify?
 
CSharp said:
I'm not following your train of thought. Can you clarify?
Click to expand...
Charlie Kirk stole the methodology of grifting off of college students from the inventor of modern American fascism.
 
Kyrion said:
Charlie Kirk stole the methodology of grifting off of college students from the inventor of modern American fascism.
Click to expand...

ummm. ok. Even if true it's FAR from evidence that Kirk was a racist. Do I need to point out the fallacy?
 
Citizen said:
So you think that these institutions of higher learning should not recruit anyone?
Click to expand...
If they do it's for two reasons. They suck and no one wants to attend them, they want to fulfill some racist quota
Citizen said:
Because they do and always have.
Click to expand...
Why they can't get enough applicants do they suck that much ass?
Citizen said:
So take it up with the institutions
Click to expand...
Why you just admitted they know they suck.
Citizen said:
Not the students they are recruiting because they are the best and the brightest in the nation.
Click to expand...
Why wouldn't the best and brightest just apply?
Citizen said:
You sound a little jealous to me
Click to expand...
Whatever feelings you have to project on me to feel better about your position go ahead.
 
NatMorton said:
And the goalposts move again. We are not discussing the plight of black people. We are discussing whether discriminating based on race is racial discrimination.

Do you not realize you're engaging in one logical fallacy after another?
Click to expand...
The reason why special considerations have been given to black people through affirmative action and DEI is because of how America has treated them. Do you think Harvard just decided out of the blue to treat black people differently for no damn reason?
 
CLAX1911 said:
If they do it's for two reasons. They suck and no one wants to attend them, they want to fulfill some racist quota

Why they can't get enough applicants do they suck that much ass?

Why you just admitted they know they suck.

Why wouldn't the best and brightest just apply?

Whatever feelings you have to project on me to feel better about your position go ahead.
Click to expand...
LOL, what a stellar response. Suck, suck, suck
 
hecatmoggie said:
I want liberals/lefties/Democrats to show me proof of why they hate Charlie Kirk and label him racist and hateful. PROVE why you believe what you do.

I don't want little cut out snippets from a conversation - give me something in context and full text and prove what is being said

I'll debunk one to start - this is NOT an example of Charlie Kirk being racist

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024


In the full context of that discussion Charlie was showing how DEI took us from never questioning people in higher positions (like airplane pilots) to wondering if they were DEI hires and only good pilots vs the best pilots because of hiring practices.

Yes, in recent years, major U.S. airlines like American Airlines and Southwest Airlines engaged in DEI-focused hiring practices and programs, but they have since agreed to discontinue these specific programs and revert to merit-based hiring following legal complaints from organizations like America First Legal (AFL). So what Charlie Kirk said was absolutely true and remember what he said IN the discussion that liberal media won't tell you

Charlie said "It also … creates unhealthy thinking patterns. I don't wanna think that way. And no one should, right?"



So if you're going to respond here - bring something. Discuss something Charlie Kirk said that showed he was racist and hated ....... because I'll listen. Charlie Kirk's assassination is different, its moved this nation unlike anything I've ever seen before. The left hates him - show me why
Click to expand...
Most everything that he said.

Why do you run from his words.
 
Citizen said:
The reason why special considerations have been given to black people through affirmative action and DEI is because of how America has treated them. Do you think Harvard just decided out of the blue to treat black people differently for no damn reason?
Click to expand...
In other words, your solution to past racial discrimination is present racial discrimination. And your solution to present racial discrimination is future racial discrimination.

And if those words sound familiar, they're paraphrased from Ibram X. Kendi. He's wrong, too, but at least he's not hiding behind euphemisms like you or the folks at Harvard. He's open about it.
 
NatMorton said:
In other words, your solution to past racial discrimination is present racial discrimination. And your solution to present racial discrimination is future racial discrimination.

And if those words sound familiar, they're paraphrased from Ibram X. Kendi. He's wrong, too, but at least he's not hiding behind euphemisms like you or the folks at Harvard. He's open about it.
Click to expand...
You call it racial discrimination, I don’t
 
Left-wing logic: It's okay to discriminate based on race provided you A) have good intentions and B) don't acknowledge you're racially discriminating.
 
NatMorton said:
It's more than an opinion. When you favor one race of another you are -- by defintion -- discriminating based on race.

View attachment 67592002
Click to expand...
That’s not the case here

Diversity
2.
the practice or quality of including or involving people from a range of different social and ethnic backgrounds and of different genders, sexual orientations, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom