• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CDC Study Falsifies Definitions to Cover Up Vaccine Deaths Shown by Autopsies

munkle

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
1,074
Reaction score
293
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
So for example, if you walk into the clinic get your first or second shot, doesn't matter which, and you walk out and keel over in the parking dead of a heart attack, you weren't vaccinated. You were only vaccinated if you do your dying at least two weeks later. Thus your death falls into the column of those selfish people.

CDC Study Falsifies Definitions to Cover Up Vaccine Deaths Shown by Autopsies

 

Who the hell is Coronanews123, and why should we trust a word that they say?
 
Who the hell is Coronanews123, and why should we trust a word that they say?
Good point. Especially when they don't identify who they are or who one can contact.
 
And you think a covid conspiracy website is news?
So much BS going on there you could use it for fertilizer.
 
The OP's link has this to say about the "author" of the piece.

All posts by Publius​

Publius is an American writer and journalist. presently taking cover in Texas.

 
When you hover over the "below source" it reads Ron Johnson
 
Another right wing conspiracy theory? Go figure.
 
Who is feeding you this bullshit and why do you keep going back for more?
 
What I like is the piece never cites exactly what the CDC's "unvaccinated death" definition is nor does it provide a link to that information at the CDC?

So there is that.
 
What I like is the piece never cites exactly what the CDC's "unvaccinated death" definition is nor does it provide a link to that information at the CDC?

So there is that.
To quote Nigel Tufnel "Well that's just nitpicking, isn't it?"
 
What I like is the piece never cites exactly what the CDC's "unvaccinated death" definition is nor does it provide a link to that information at the CDC?

So there is that.

In the Interwebs there are these things called "links" lol.
"14 days has not yet passed"


"A person is fully vaccinated two weeks after receiving all recommended doses in the primary series of their COVID-19 vaccination."
 
Yes.

I have been there to that page before.

But that does not do the trick of answering my question.

Nothing on that page gives a CDC "unvaccinated death definition" as I asked for?
 
An earlier thread by the OP which uses the same stupid source:

 
What I like is the piece never cites exactly what the CDC's "unvaccinated death" definition is nor does it provide a link to that information at the CDC?

So there is that.
They seem to be either purposely or stupidly mixing up "unvaccinated Covid death" with deaths after vaccination. Those are 2 separate things. Unvaccinated deaths are only recorded with regards to Covid. VAERS requires all deaths to be reported, even if they know those deaths are not related to the vaccine.
 
And VAERS is never 100% of what is supposed to be reported to them.

Conspiracy theorizing and alarmism works best when "purposely or stupidly mixing up" facts and figures and commentary and such.
 
Hasn't heart attacks in the younger generation been escalating?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…