From the Democratic Party platform:
"There is insufficient research on effective gun prevention policies, which is why the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must have the resources it needs to study gun violence as a public health issue."
In other words, the Democrats hold the position that we don't know what gun prevention (sic) policies would be effective.
Even in that ignorance, the Democrats are still supporting "common sense" laws like:
Amend the Lautenberg Amendment to cover boyfriends, dating.
Universal background checks.
Repeal PLCAA - Allow gun manufacturers to be sued out of business
Ban "assault weapons"
Ban "large capacity magazines"
Buy-back programs
Impose red flag laws
Ban 3-D printing of guns
Ban bump stocks.
Permit to purchase licensing system
"Charleston" loophole
Mandatory notification of stolen guns
"Hate crime" loophole
No "ghost guns".
Eliminate campus carry
Raise the legal age to purchase a firearm
Increase taxes on guns and ammunition specifically to reduce the number of lawful citizens exercising a Constitutionally protected right
Limit the number of firearms that can be purchased in a month by law abiding citizens.
Ban silencers
Expand gun free zones to universities and colleges
If they don't know what policies will be effective and need CDC to study the issue, why are they pushing for all of these?
I don't think the pro gun crowd is going to go for this.
Source?
I don't think the pro gun crowd is going to go for this.
From the Democratic Party platform:
"There is insufficient research on effective gun prevention policies, which is why the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must have the resources it needs to study gun violence as a public health issue."
In other words, the Democrats hold the position that we don't know what gun prevention (sic) policies would be effective.
Even in that ignorance, the Democrats are still supporting "common sense" laws like:
Amend the Lautenberg Amendment to cover boyfriends, dating.
Universal background checks.
Repeal PLCAA - Allow gun manufacturers to be sued out of business
Ban "assault weapons"
Ban "large capacity magazines"
Buy-back programs
Impose red flag laws
Ban 3-D printing of guns
Ban bump stocks.
Permit to purchase licensing system
"Charleston" loophole
Mandatory notification of stolen guns
"Hate crime" loophole
No "ghost guns".
Eliminate campus carry
Raise the legal age to purchase a firearm
Increase taxes on guns and ammunition specifically to reduce the number of lawful citizens exercising a Constitutionally protected right
Limit the number of firearms that can be purchased in a month by law abiding citizens.
Ban silencers
Expand gun free zones to universities and colleges
If they don't know what policies will be effective and need CDC to study the issue, why are they pushing for all of these?
If they don't know what policies will be effective and need CDC to study the issue, why are they pushing for all of these?
From the Democratic Party platform:
"There is insufficient research on effective gun prevention policies, which is why the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must have the resources it needs to study gun violence as a public health issue."
In other words, the Democrats hold the position that we don't know what gun prevention (sic) policies would be effective.
Even in that ignorance, the Democrats are still supporting "common sense" laws like:
Amend the Lautenberg Amendment to cover boyfriends, dating.
Universal background checks.
Repeal PLCAA - Allow gun manufacturers to be sued out of business
Ban "assault weapons"
Ban "large capacity magazines"
Buy-back programs
Impose red flag laws
Ban 3-D printing of guns
Ban bump stocks.
Permit to purchase licensing system
"Charleston" loophole
Mandatory notification of stolen guns
"Hate crime" loophole
No "ghost guns".
Eliminate campus carry
Raise the legal age to purchase a firearm
Increase taxes on guns and ammunition specifically to reduce the number of lawful citizens exercising a Constitutionally protected right
Limit the number of firearms that can be purchased in a month by law abiding citizens.
Ban silencers
Expand gun free zones to universities and colleges
If they don't know what policies will be effective and need CDC to study the issue, why are they pushing for all of these?
One thing is known and that is that the CDC wants NOTHING to do with diseases or public health. They want to be progressive politicians getting huge grants to write Democratic Party platform promos.
Good question. And another good question is: why is the CDC the only organization that can study the issue?
I think they are the most equipped and the least partisan.
We all should support this. Gun owners know the realty. Science backing it up will bolster their position.
Good question. And another good question is: why is the CDC the only organization that can study the issue?
Well Everytown claims too be studying it as is the VPC and Brady Bunch. LOL.And Rucker where you been haunting? Long time.
I think they are ... the least partisan.
I think they are the most equipped and the least partisan.
We all should support this. Gun owners know the realty. Science backing it up will bolster their position.
If I recall correctly it was a CDC study a few years ago that said legally own guns were used far more often for defense than for illegal purposes.From the Democratic Party platform:
"There is insufficient research on effective gun prevention policies, which is why the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention must have the resources it needs to study gun violence as a public health issue."
In other words, the Democrats hold the position that we don't know what gun prevention (sic) policies would be effective.
Even in that ignorance, the Democrats are still supporting "common sense" laws like:
Amend the Lautenberg Amendment to cover boyfriends, dating.
Universal background checks.
Repeal PLCAA - Allow gun manufacturers to be sued out of business
Ban "assault weapons"
Ban "large capacity magazines"
Buy-back programs
Impose red flag laws
Ban 3-D printing of guns
Ban bump stocks.
Permit to purchase licensing system
"Charleston" loophole
Mandatory notification of stolen guns
"Hate crime" loophole
No "ghost guns".
Eliminate campus carry
Raise the legal age to purchase a firearm
Increase taxes on guns and ammunition specifically to reduce the number of lawful citizens exercising a Constitutionally protected right
Limit the number of firearms that can be purchased in a month by law abiding citizens.
Ban silencers
Expand gun free zones to universities and colleges
If they don't know what policies will be effective and need CDC to study the issue, why are they pushing for all of these?
The ability to outsource for one.How are they the most equipped? Do they even have any gun violence experts on staff? They seem to outsource their studies.
Doj???The Department of Justice certainly does, but the Left doesn't like their reports.
If I recall correctly it was a CDC study a few years ago that said legally own guns were used far more often for defense than for illegal purposes.
But those of us that own guns know better. I doubt a confirmation from the CDC of our arguments will make a difference gun control is about control of people not guns or criminals.Another point. Given that they already have a list of "common sense" gun control, and still want CDC studies, they already have an idea of what the results will be.
Why is science just part of the Democrat party? I think this attitude does more damage to the pro gun rights side than anything.Going into a "scientific" study with the results pre-determined is why we got the Dickey Act in the first place.
The ability to outsource for one.
Doj???
But those of us that own guns know better. I doubt a confirmation from the CDC of our arguments will make a difference gun control is about control of people not guns or criminals.
Dunning-kruger again.
Why is science just part of the Democrat party? I think this attitude does more damage to the pro gun rights side than anything.
Hardly.
But partisanship shouldn't be a problem if the studies are peer-reviewed, published, and the raw data provided for everyone to reach their own conclusions. That last point is hardly one that is a characteristic of many of the gun violence studies that are cited by gun control advocates, although they are still pretty easy to pick apart.
Given the fact that almost all of these studies are based on analysis of crime statistics, anyone with some time on his or her hands and access to a spreadsheet program could do them. The CDC is not uniquely equipped.
It's not part of the Democratic Party where guns are concern, hence the quotes. You can't call it scientific if you've already picked the results of the scientific study before it starts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?