• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CBS canned ‘The Late Show’ over tens of millions in financial losses annually

Are you confused??
No, I read the OP and responded to it. Did you read the OP?

The plan is to try to make some money by telling the truth and reporting new[ s]?

Are you confused?

The Late Show wasn't even billed as news. Did you think it was a news show??
It's a nature/science documentary on the effects of gravity and the wonders of modern fashionwear.

Anything else?
 
Maybe the Beverly Hillbillies, the Andy Griffith show or Green Acres. Even reruns of Lost in Space would do better
From a financial point? Possibly.

"Late Night TV" has changed dramatically since the days of Jack Paar and Johnny Carson. Back in the day, viewers have almost no choices as to how to entertain themselves via TV. There were three networks, that's all, and none of them broadcast 24/7.

A live show, complete with studio audience and a live band is a relatively expensive endeavor. Back in the day an actor plugging their latest movie could be seen by 15-20 million viewers in a single show. These shows need those kinds of numbers in order to profit. Today we have literally hundreds of cable and satellite channels to select from 24/7. The ROI or even booking guests can be problematic for a network. The viewers just aren't there anymore.

I would not be surprised if the others (NBC, ABC, FOX) don't eventually follow suit.

This decision by CBS has nothing to do with Colbert's politics.
 
From a financial point? Possibly.

"Late Night TV" has changed dramatically since the days of Jack Paar and Johnny Carson. Back in the day, viewers have almost no choices as to how to entertain themselves via TV. There were three networks, that's all, and none of them broadcast 24/7.

A live show, complete with studio audience and a live band is a relatively expensive endeavor. Back in the day an actor plugging their latest movie could be seen by 15-20 million viewers in a single show. These shows need those kinds of numbers in order to profit. Today we have literally hundreds of cable and satellite channels to select from 24/7. The ROI or even booking guests can be problematic for a network. The viewers just aren't there anymore.

I would not be surprised if the others (NBC, ABC, FOX) don't eventually follow suit.

This decision by CBS has nothing to do with Colbert's politics.
I don't doubt your financial assessment, but I'm not so quick to dismiss this as non-political. CBS has revealed itself as not only political, but for sale. And they'll even pay $10m for this privilege.

A company that capitulates to Trump in a back door deal is not to be trusted. We don't know whether Colbert's firing was given a nod and a wink in whatever negotiations took place. Under normal circumstances, this could be seen as CBS getting ahead of the pack in terminating costly programming, but these aren't normal circumstances. The POTUS is suing everyone. The president. Suing private companies and private individuals. And CBS is along for the ride.

Ruport Murdoch is looking like the anti-fascist here.
 
Maybe the Beverly Hillbillies, the Andy Griffith show or Green Acres. Even reruns of Lost in Space would do better
How do you “do better” than being the top rated show?
 
This decision by CBS has nothing to do with Colbert's politics.
We don’t actually know what is driving this decision.
All we know is what they SAY drove their decision.
But there are certainly questions.
 
No, I read the OP and responded to it. Did you read the OP?

The plan is to try to make some money by telling the truth and reporting new[ s]?

Are you confused?


It's a nature/science documentary on the effects of gravity and the wonders of modern fashionwear.

Anything else?
Yeah, you didn't know Next time you want to pose as a wise guy, get your facts straight
 
Yeah, you didn't know Next time you want to pose as a wise guy, get your facts straight
As soon as you read the OP, then you'll see my facts are straight. This is just trolling.

Have some tourism ads.





Anything else?
 



Those are huge losses and of course they've been happening for a while. The left just needs their singing and dancing monkey's to generate the ridicule necessary for their supporters to feel good about being so loathsome in life.



Those are some ugly numbers.




The plan is to try to make some money by telling the truth and reporting new? You don't say? What an interesting strategy going forward. It might even make them some money.
Maybe CBS has learned their lesson.
Hate us not funny.
 
I suspect by making a profit
That’s what I mean.
Short term, you can save a lot by producing no programming whatsoever.
Long term, you need quality programming to build and keep an audience.
Without an audience, you will soon have zero revenue.
 



Those are huge losses and of course they've been happening for a while. The left just needs their singing and dancing monkey's to generate the ridicule necessary for their supporters to feel good about being so loathsome in life.



Those are some ugly numbers.




The plan is to try to make some money by telling the truth and reporting new? You don't say? What an interesting strategy going forward. It might even make them some money.

I think the days of late shows are over. Why bother when there are hundreds of online media to accomodate whatever your heart desires whenever you want.
 
Have you ever watched a true journalist news show? Lol, no, never.

Would you know what one is? No, never.

Most news used to focus on giving the facts.

The panels, the "explainers" and other nonsense are not news.
 
The Late Show isn't a news program and Colbert is a comedian. Do you see the late-night slot being replaced with a serious news program? That slot has been held by talk-shows and comedians for 70 years, across all networks. What do you foresee as a money-making replacement?

It doesn't matter what I see. It matters what CBS sees as a money making replacement or even just a lose significantly less money replacement.

They could run infomercials and not lose $40 million a year.
 
If that was the reason why keep it going until 2026?

There are probably several long term leases, contracts and other things to wind down. You can ask CBS. I did see doing a quick search that his last three year contract extension was signed in 2023 so no buy out if they just go to the end of it and his contract is large enough to count as roughly 40% of the annual losses.
 
I think the days of late shows are over. Why bother when there are hundreds of online media to accomodate whatever your heart desires whenever you want.

I agree but also these shows and let's remember back when it was largely just a show, were a type of influence and gatekeeping that doesn't exist anymore.

I don't know how much some of you watch stuff with grandchildren but I think those crying about Sesame Street vs say a Cocomelon or Ms Rachel should see the differences time and technology has brought.
 
Most news used to focus on giving the facts.

The panels, the "explainers" and other nonsense are not news.
And right wing media has stayed from conservative editorial to propaganda.
 
It is so weird how obsessed republicans are with tv personalities.
Not really, when you consider this is the "I am your retribution" flex on all the people who make fun of Donnie Boy. So there's that and whether or not the cancellation has anything at all to do with Trump, which is still suspect considering Paramount's kowtowing to the administration already. Honestly, this might be a better opportunity for Colbert since he has the name recognition and audience to branch out into streaming and podcasting which is where the audiences really are.
;)
 
A lot of liberal think of it as news with entertainment. Although there hasn't been any humor on late shows for years.
Conservatives too, since Fox News does much of the same. They've actually replicated much of what other cable news networks have done in terms of endless punditry and even have their own political humor show.
 
I think the average age for this show was like 68. It was a good outlet for the sort of folks who spent all day watching MSNBC and needed to change the channel when they started to repeat the Rachel Maddow show from earlier in the day.
 
I think the days of late shows are over. Why bother when there are hundreds of online media to accomodate whatever your heart desires whenever you want.
Linear television (cable and broadcast) as a whole has been in a steady state of decline in terms of overall viewership. It just this May that streaming surpassed linear television in total usage, plus audiences are accessing content on a variety of devices with the younger generations viewing content largely on mobile devices. What keeps linear television still going are the older demographics who aren't as tech savvy and just use televisions and sports/live events fans. Streaming has made quite the mess of sports, though it's starting to consolidate a bit more now.
 
It doesn't matter what I see.
It matters to you, or else you wouldn't be posting your opinion.

It matters what CBS sees as a money making replacement or even just a lose significantly less money replacement.
You conflated this time slot with news. That's what needs explanation.

They could run infomercials and not lose $40 million a year.
Cool. What does news have to do with your joy?
 
I don't doubt your financial assessment, but I'm not so quick to dismiss this as non-political. CBS has revealed itself as not only political, but for sale. And they'll even pay $10m for this privilege.

A company that capitulates to Trump in a back door deal is not to be trusted. We don't know whether Colbert's firing was given a nod and a wink in whatever negotiations took place. Under normal circumstances, this could be seen as CBS getting ahead of the pack in terminating costly programming, but these aren't normal circumstances. The POTUS is suing everyone. The president. Suing private companies and private individuals. And CBS is along for the ride.

Ruport Murdoch is looking like the anti-fascist here.
CBS has made some very poor decisions in the past, so nothing it does surprises me. The only reason "Gunsmoke" wasn't cancelled in its 12th season is because Babe Paley, wife of CBS founder Bill Paley, fought for it. Other poor decisions? Never giving "American Gothic" a chance. Killing "Person of Interest," a hugely successful show, because the writers were making more money than the network. More recently, cancelling "Blue Bloods," a show that ruled Friday nights and was enormously popular, despite Tom Selleck himself begging that the network not do this.
 
Back
Top Bottom