When I see a crowd of people in the street, I don't try to drive through them. To do so would be foolish.
Not really. Both crowds of people blocked an intersection. We sat there for awile before a cop came. It happens. I'm not going to risk someone's life because I feel inconvenienced.
I don't either but that does not make what this driver did illegal...
Me either... but that does not make driving though them illegal.
They are ALL breaking the law... I seriously doubt that none of them have a record.
If you hit someone it could most definitely pose a problem.
For either party... yes. And?
Jaywalking is, generally speaking, not a crime. It's a civil violation
This guy did not have to try and force his way through a crowd of people with his car.
This guy did not have to try and force his way through a crowd of people with his car.
!!! Drama Queen Alert !!!
This whole thing is one HUGE logical FAIL.
Wilson is the drama queen, did you see his face? Someone slapped him so he shot him dead.
Otoh, that crowd of people did not have to be blocking traffic, standing in the street, and trying to physically damage his car either.
I understand. These people also did not have to block traffic. That said, trying to drive through a crowd IS NOT ILLEGAL. Blocking traffic IS ILLEGAL.
What if some person had to get somewhere for an emergency? What if the crowd would not listen? Can the person try to drive though? I am interested in hearing your opinion. I know I would drive through carefully and if they did not move or attacked my car I would drive faster and hope they got out of the way... if not? Their ****ing problem. What is your take?
These people are obviously not jaywalking... In a similar incident these protesters were charged:
The protesters face charges, such as remaining at an unlawful assembly, resisting, delaying or obstructing an officer and blocking the sidewalk or street.
33 charged with blocking L.A. city streets during immigration protests | L.A. NOW | Los Angeles Times
Otoh, that crowd of people did not have to be blocking traffic, standing in the street, and trying to physically damage his car either.
Otoh, that crowd of people did not have to be blocking traffic, standing in the street, and trying to physically damage his car either.
No one tried to damage his car until *after* he ran into a few of them
I gave a take. I have been stopped because of a mob of people leaving a football game. It was irritating but I did not use my vehicle as a way to force my way through the crowd. If there was an opening, I would have taken that route, otherwise, I'm waiting so I don't hit the people. It's not worth a life.
There was NO emergency in this situation so not worth my time responding to a straw man.
And that point is being conveniently missed.
Don't answer if you don't like but it does go to show how you really feel. If they are free to block the intersection and not have a car attempt to drive through 100% of the time then you would not allow anybody to drive through in an emergency situation either.
Maybe they damaged his car because he tried to run them over.
You know for certain that right when he pulled up nobody kicked at his doors, or anything? Nothing was thrown?
Of course nobody can tell from that video, but you two seem pretty certain.
Yeah, sure.
You know for certain that right when he pulled up nobody kicked at his doors, or anything? Nothing was thrown?
Of course nobody can tell from that video, but you two seem pretty certain.
If you're going to argue that people were trying to damage his car *before* he hit anyone, you'll have to provide some evidence and not just speculation.
It is just logic... don't be frightened.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?