So heartbreaking.A woman in Oklahoma can't get an abortion of a cancerous molar pregnancy, which can't ever develop into a viable fetus, because of problems with hospital policy:
Read the article - un-f---ing-believable.
| the Center for Reproductive Rights... To conduct the research, several young women called 34 hospitals in the state with a script, saying they were pregnant for the first time, trying to decide which Oklahoma hospital to go to for care, and wanting to understand the hospital's policies and processes for providing abortions if pregnancy complications arose. |
****ing unreal. I think a lot of anti choicers just give lip service to being ok w/ abortions for the woman's health/life.A woman in Oklahoma can't get an abortion of a cancerous molar pregnancy, which can't ever develop into a viable fetus, because of problems with hospital policy:
Read the article - un-f---ing-believable.
****ing unreal. I think a lot of anti choicers just give lip service to being ok w/ abortions for the woman's health/life.
Cruelty is the point.A woman in Oklahoma can't get an abortion of a cancerous molar pregnancy, which can't ever develop into a viable fetus, because of problems with hospital policy:
Read the article - un-f---ing-believable.
Your mistake is taking their claims at face value. They aren't pro-life. They're pro-death.I'm not sure why so many pro-life people agree that it's acceptable to kill the unborn to save the life of the mother. As the article even said, there can be times when the mother can be kept "alive" to act as "an incubator."
Pro-life people...why should the mother's 'life' take precedence over the unborn's? I mean, the unborn will be starting a whole new life, while the woman has already lived much of hers. The unborn is an 'innocent' life according to them...and the woman is obviously, like us all a sinner. Anyone want to tell me why?
At minimum, most pro-life supporters claim that the unborn are exactly the same, in value, as born people. So...why prioritize the life of the mother?
Your mistake is taking their claims at face value. They aren't pro-life. They're pro-death.
Even if there is none.They're pro-fetus.
The only point they can possibly be making is that they have the power to destroy women's lives if the women don't live by the legislators religious dogma. When one conservative denomination tries to impose their religious beliefs about women's responsibility on all women it becomes 1st Amendment issue.Cruelty is the point.
Elected R's are killing women to make a political point.
Ho hum.A woman in Oklahoma can't get an abortion of a cancerous molar pregnancy, which can't ever develop into a viable fetus, because of problems with hospital policy:
Read the article - un-f---ing-believable.
Ho hum.
Go to another hospital and stop whining.
Or go out of state
Yet another opportunity for someone to whine loudly, and a bunch of morons who know no details to join in the whining.
The Internet is now only a vehicle for incessant public grouo whining.
I agree.The only point they can possibly be making is that they have the power to destroy women's lives if the women don't live by the legislators religious dogma. When one conservative denomination tries to impose their religious beliefs about women's responsibility on all women it becomes 1st Amendment issue.
A woman in Oklahoma can't get an abortion of a cancerous molar pregnancy, which can't ever develop into a viable fetus, because of problems with hospital policy:
Read the article - un-f---ing-believable.
A woman in Oklahoma can't get an abortion of a cancerous molar pregnancy, which can't ever develop into a viable fetus, because of problems with hospital policy:
Read the article - un-f---ing-believable.
They wouldn't even allow her to set foot inside the hospital, as if her presence inside would be contagious, or maybe....just too depressing for them to look at.
Give me a frickin' break. Anti choicers are all "We are fine w/ abortion for the woman's life/health", but when an example is give, they never agree w/ it.Ho hum.
Go to another hospital and stop whining.
Or go out of state
Yet another opportunity for someone to whine loudly, and a bunch of morons who know no details to join in the whining.
The Internet is now only a vehicle for incessant public group whining.
So says a man who, were he raped by another man, would hold a grudge through 10 reincarnations.Ho hum.
Go to another hospital and stop whining.
Or go out of state
Yet another opportunity for someone to whine loudly, and a bunch of morons who know no details to join in the whining.
The Internet is now only a vehicle for incessant public grouo whining.
Incessant public whining.Give me a frickin' break. Anti choicers are all "We are fine w/ abortion for the woman's life/health", but when an example is give, they never agree w/ it.
It’s just another moron looking for their 15 minutes of fame.So says a man who, were he raped by another man, would hold a grudge through 10 reincarnations.
So go find a hospital that'll do it, you may need to look outside of OK.A woman in Oklahoma can't get an abortion of a cancerous molar pregnancy, which can't ever develop into a viable fetus, because of problems with hospital policy:
Read the article - un-f---ing-believable.
It will be rejected because the synagogues religious beliefs cannot take precedence over the secular law banning abortionsI agree.
Synagogue sues Florida over abortion ban, saying it violates freedom of religion for Jews
The lawsuit highlights why we shouldn't be legislating something that's essentially a religious issue in the first place.www.upworthy.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?