• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Canada 🇨🇦 is the first country to announce a donation of AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles to Ukraine 🇺🇦

Good.

"That'll buff out" doesn't apply to anything those hit.
 
Then F-16 is next. Sidewinder was made for F-16. A good sign. The world needs more Canada (y)


The AIM-9 Sidewinder was not designed for the F-16. The missile entered servive with the Navy in 1956. Today, all U.S. fighter planes and some helicopters can fire the Sidewinder. 40 other nations employ the Sidewinder.
 
Then F-16 is next. Sidewinder was made for F-16. A good sign. The world needs more Canada (y)


It will look really good on the wing wreckage of F-16s shot down by S-300 missiles
 
the game changer will be the AIM-120, which can be carried by F-16s. I believe russian aircraft are staying over their aa defense zone, so any aim-9x engagement would be exciting in a high pucker factor sort of way..
 
the game changer will be the AIM-120, which can be carried by F-16s. I believe russian aircraft are staying over their aa defense zone, so any aim-9x engagement would be exciting in a high pucker factor sort of way..

The AIM-120 will be more of a game changer as part of NASAMs.
 
down by S-300 missiles
SURE
OOPS?
57fe50b68109ee77228b511e
 
A sight to gladden your heart, I suppose.
Obviously the maidan regime’s imminent military defeat will be a good thing for the world
 
Obviously the maidan regime’s imminent military defeat will be a good thing for the world
No it won't. It would be a good thing for Russia but 1- it's not going to happen and 2- if it did it would just embolden the tyrannical despotism in Moscow and reinforce the cruel illusion that might makes right.
What do you think the result of Russian military success would be after a string of American failures?
 
No it won't. It would be a good thing for Russia
Which is good because Russia is waging Just War and the Ukraine is waging a war of athiestic cultural ahniliation
but 1- it's not going to happen
Russia is a winning
and 2- if it did it would just embolden the tyrannical despotism in Moscow
Russia is not a tyrannical country.
and reinforce the cruel illusion that might makes right.
In this case the might is right
What do you think the result of Russian military success would be after a string of American failures?
The US backing off on corporate and imperial exploitation of other countries
 
Which is good because Russia is waging Just War and the Ukraine is waging a war of athiestic cultural ahniliation

Russia is a winning

Russia is not a tyrannical country.
Putin hates Americans.

Maga believes he's going to welcome 'em with open arms.

Putin is the same as Trump, he throws you under the bus when he's through with you.

Putin will never get that far though. Neither will MAGA which is screwed either way.
 
Which is good because Russia is waging Just War and the Ukraine is waging a war of athiestic cultural ahniliation

Russia is a winning

Russia is not a tyrannical country.

In this case the might is right

The US backing off on corporate and imperial exploitation of other countries
It’s amazing you can pack so much wrong all into one post.
I doubt you could do much better of that was your actual goal.
 
Which is good because Russia is waging Just War and the Ukraine is waging a war of athiestic cultural ahniliation

Russia is a winning

Russia is not a tyrannical country.

In this case the might is right

The US backing off on corporate and imperial exploitation of other countries
Well, you've made your position pretty clear. I won't be justifying it with an argument.
 
You are aware that those are mutually exclusive, right?
Might and right are mutually exclusive?

So America was in the wrong in world war 2?
 
Might and right are mutually exclusive?

Claiming they are not "tyrannical", and then excusing their behavior in multiple invasions of Ukraine simply because they can.

And the US in WWII is obviously completely different, as to start with it was attacked by one country and had war declared upon it by 2 others immediately after. You might have a small point, if the US had been the one to attack and invade Japan. So your counterargument is complete nonsense as the US was not acting "tyrannical".

You know, when trying to rebut an argument, your claims have to make at least some kind of sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom