• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Can you debate gun control using only logical arguments...

Bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit. You are using completely arbitrary definitions of safety.

What would yours be and what relation would it be to the many gun related accidental injuries per year ?

In 2023 there were 46,728 gun related deaths
62.8% were preventable/accidental

 
What would yours be and what relation would it be to the many gun related accidental injuries per year ?

In 2023 there were 46,728 gun related deaths
62.8% were preventable/accidental


Your source says 1%.

Can you explain the discrepancy between what your source actually says, and what you say it says?

Are you simply lying?
 
What would yours be and what relation would it be to the many gun related accidental injuries per year ?

In 2023 there were 46,728 gun related deaths
62.8% were preventable/accidental

Why are you lying about what your own citation says? Did you even read it?
 
Loaded question

When did you stop beating your wife ?

Except there is good evidence you did in fact misquote your own source.
 
What would yours be and what relation would it be to the many gun related accidental injuries per year ?

In 2023 there were 46,728 gun related deaths
62.8% were preventable/accidental

First section of your link:

"Gun-related deaths from preventable, intentional, and undetermined causes totaled 46,728 in 2023, a decrease of 3% from 48,204 deaths in 2022. Suicides account for 58% of deaths related to firearms, while 38% were homicides, and about 1% were preventable/accidental. Please note that the term gun is used on this page to refer to firearms that can be carried by a person, not to the larger class of weapons."

That lines up with the average of 500 accidental deaths per a year which is negligible in a population of 100 million gun owners. .0005%of gun owners.
 
First section of your link:

"Gun-related deaths from preventable, intentional, and undetermined causes totaled 46,728 in 2023, a decrease of 3% from 48,204 deaths in 2022. Suicides account for 58% of deaths related to firearms, while 38% were homicides, and about 1% were preventable/accidental. Please note that the term gun is used on this page to refer to firearms that can be carried by a person, not to the larger class of weapons."

That lines up with the average of 500 accidental deaths per a year which is negligible in a population of 100 million gun owners. .0005%of gun owners.

Did you even see his "62.8%" figure in his source?
 
First section of your link:

"Gun-related deaths from preventable, intentional, and undetermined causes totaled 46,728 in 2023, a decrease of 3% from 48,204 deaths in 2022. Suicides account for 58% of deaths related to firearms, while 38% were homicides, and about 1% were preventable/accidental. Please note that the term gun is used on this page to refer to firearms that can be carried by a person, not to the larger class of weapons."

That lines up with the average of 500 accidental deaths per a year which is negligible in a population of 100 million gun owners. .0005%of gun owners

And you think that's OK ?

And how many non-fatal injuries per year are caused by gun-related "accidents" ?
 
And you think that's OK ?

And how many non-fatal injuries per year are caused by gun-related "accidents" ?
And there's the goalpost move and rabbit hole.

Be honest and admit your error about the 62.8% and then we can debate.
 
And there's the goalpost move and rabbit hole.

Nope, merely your pathetic attempt to deflect.

Be honest and admit your error about the 62.8% and then we can debate.

So non-fatal gun related injuries don't count as "safety issues" ?
It must be a strange criteria of "safety" if you really think that.
 
Nope, merely your pathetic attempt to deflect.



So non-fatal gun related injuries don't count as "safety issues" ?
It must be a strange criteria of "safety" if you really think that.

😆

Dodge and deflect.

The only real question is whether your misquote of your source was a lie or a mistake. You seem reluctant...very reluctant...to own up to either.
 
Nope, merely your pathetic attempt to deflect.



So non-fatal gun related injuries don't count as "safety issues" ?
It must be a strange criteria of "safety" if you really think that.
Let me remind you of your lie.

What would yours be and what relation would it be to the many gun related accidental injuries per year ?

In 2023 there were 46,728 gun related deaths
62.8% were preventable/accidental


The actual number per the article you cited is about 1%.

Why the lie @Rich2018 ? Why are you so unwilling to admit your mistake?

Could this be the reason?


Some people refuse to admit they’re wrong, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, due to a fragile ego.
 
The 2A rights don’t include the right to shoot (or shoot at) another person, thus (sufficient) “gun control” laws already exist.

Well THAT was a dumb thing to say TT. smh
 
Well I think that Gun Nuts will tell us all about cars, swimming pools, stairs and how suicide isnt actually a death.

But you said "use logic" so NO, they can't do that.
 
To reiterate...

Rich's source: "about 1% were preventable/accidental"

Rich's interpretation: "62.8% were preventable/accidental"

😆

Extreme gun control advocates...he's one of yours for sure.
 
The actual number per the article you cited is about 1%.

So then you are saying out of all the gun deaths, 99% of them were not accidents nor were they preventable?

I dont think that statement was much of a flex.
 
Well I think that Gun Nuts will tell us all about cars, swimming pools, stairs and how suicide isnt actually a death.

But you said "use logic" so NO, they can't do that.

Do you have a single example of "suicide isn't actually a death"?

I say you don't, and you're just making shit up to troll the thread.
 
6ohl55.jpg

To reiterate...

Rich's source: "about 1% were preventable/accidental"

Rich's interpretation: "62.8% were preventable/accidental"

😆

Extreme gun control advocates...he's one of yours for sure.
 
So then you are saying out of all the gun deaths, 99% of them were not accidents nor were they preventable?

I dont think that statement was much of a flex.

Your reading comprehension is atrocious.
 
The core problem is always one thing - violent people/violent acts. That's it, period, end of story. Literally everyone could carry an AR strapped to their backs every day ... and if nobody is violent? no issues at all. Guns don't assault, guns don't make people violent. They can be used in acts of violence, yes, like knives can be ..... but the core problem isn't the weapon.

In that case, everyone should be able to have a nuclear warhead.

After all: they arent the core problem. They're "arms". Violent people are actually the problem, so naturally you want to pump as many weapons out there as possible. Since the weapons are innocent as a newborn babe.



clownfacegif.gif
 
So then you are saying out of all the gun deaths, 99% of them were not accidents nor were they preventable?

I dont think that statement was much of a flex.
Not my article. Take it up with Amber Heard. Sorry, I meant Rich.
 
Loaded question

When did you stop beating your wife ?
Your citation does not say what you claimed it said. You lied about what it said. Why did you do that?
 
And you think that's OK ?

And how many non-fatal injuries per year are caused by gun-related "accidents" ?
Why did you lie about what your citation said?
 
Back
Top Bottom