Can we all agree that the efforts Democrats make to reduce gun violence will benefit red states more than blue states?

[mrjurrs]

It's what I get from your post. You back it up.

I can't help with what you take from the post if you don't understand it.

Do you understand what is meant by 'age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths' mean?

 

[rahl]

Don't let facts get in the way of your opinion

I have not offered any opinions.

. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has them.

True. Not relevant to anything I’ve posted though.

 

[mrjurrs]

I have not offered any opinions.

True. Not relevant to anything I’ve posted though.

Since this isn't a fact...it's an opinion.
"Firearms are completely irrelevant to suicide rates."

You should put away the shovel and climb out of the hole you are digging.

 

[VanceMack]

You don't have a clue about what this thread is about.

Enumerate the lie you claim I've made or stfu.

Oh...I know exactly what YOU are about...and so does everyone else.

And you know it.

 

[rahl]

Since this isn't a fact...it's an opinion.
"Firearms are completely irrelevant to suicide rates."

It is a fact. We know this empirically.

You should put away the shovel and climb out of the hole you are digging.

I’m standing over the grave site your position is buried in

 

[L88]

I can't help with what you take from the post if you don't understand it.

Do you understand what is meant by 'age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths' mean?

So now you're not concerned with all firearms deaths, just those at a certain age?

Your focus should be, as mine is, to enforce current firearms laws to their fullest extent.
Write your congress critters, your county reps, and your city reps your DAs.
I send examples for killers who had been let off or a light slap on firearms charges previously.

You are not accomplishing anything on this forum.

 

[CLAX1911]

Legislation is the first step in due process.

You can't legislate away due process.

 

[CLAX1911]

I can't help with what you take from the post if you don't understand it.

Do you understand what is meant by 'age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths' mean?

Yeah it's basically saying I'm going to use these stipulations to manipulate the statistics to make it sound really bad.

 

[mrjurrs]

Oh...I know exactly what YOU are about...and so does everyone else.

And you know it.

So, you've got nothing.

 

[mrjurrs]

It is a fact. We know this empirically.

I’m standing over the grave site your position is buried in

Then why do you have so much trouble providing anything to back up your facts?

I'm going with operator error.

 

[rahl]

Then why do you have so much trouble providing anything to back up your facts?

I don’t. If you are new to the gun debate forum, you need to educate yourself on the failed and debunked arguments of your predecessors.

I'm going with operator error.

Facts don’t care about your feelings.

 

[mrjurrs]

So now you're not concerned with all firearms deaths, just those at a certain age?

Your focus should be, as mine is, to enforce current firearms laws to their fullest extent.
Write your congress critters, your county reps, and your city reps your DAs.
I send examples for killers who had been let off or a light slap on firearms charges previously.

You are not accomplishing anything on this forum.

For Christ's sake. Can you tell me you don't know what it means without telling me you don't know what it means?

If incarceration made us safer we wouldn't be having these conversations.

 

[mrjurrs]

You can't legislate away due process.

Can you read?

 

[mrjurrs]

Yeah it's basically saying I'm going to use these stipulations to manipulate the statistics to make it sound really bad.

Do you put any thoughts into your posts?

 

[mrjurrs]

I don’t. If you are new to the gun debate forum, you need to educate yourself on the failed and debunked arguments of your predecessors.

Facts don’t care about your feelings.

Your words? blah, blah, blah

Show me something or admit you're just making shite up.

 

[RF667799]

For Christ's sake. Can you tell me you don't know what it means without telling me you don't know what it means?

If incarceration made us safer we wouldn't be having these conversations.

Are we safer when a mass murderer is removed from society as compared to if he is at liberty to accomplish his murderous whims?

Your statement is nonsensical.

 

[mrjurrs]

Are we safer when a mass murderer is removed from society as compared to if he is at liberty to accomplish his murderous whims?

Your statement is nonsensical.

We'd be safer by preventing the weapons from getting into his hands in the first place. If incarceration made us safer, we'd already be safe.

 

[rahl]

Your words? blah, blah, blah

Crime data, not words.

Show me something or admit you're just making shite up.

This has been done in several dozen threads. If you don’t know the basics, you need to refrain from posting.

 

[mrjurrs]

Crime data, not words.

This has been done in several dozen threads. If you don’t know the basics, you need to refrain from posting.

I'll just go with too lazy or just not telling the truth.

Source the data, and if you don't know how, just ask, I'll show you. Teachers teach everyone.

 

[RF667799]

We'd be safer by preventing the weapons from getting into his hands in the first place. If incarceration made us safer, we'd already be safe.
View attachment 67576967

Your statement makes no greater sense simply because you repeated it.

I think we are safer with a mass murderer removed from society. You apparently think they should be free to roam.

 

[rahl]

I'll just go with too lazy or just not telling the truth.

I don’t care what you go with, but you remain factually incorrect.

Source the data, and if you don't know how, just ask, I'll show you. Teachers teach everyone.

This has been done in several dozen threads. If you don’t know the basics, you need to stop posting on the subject.

 

[CLAX1911]

Do you put any thoughts into your posts?

Yeah I'm not manipulated by misrepresentations in statistics.

 

[CLAX1911]

Can you read?

Can you?