These definitions aren't really helpful.
Words often have a wide semantic range, and this range changes over time often as well.
That's a good description. The problem is defining national sovereignty and international power. To some, illegal immigration indicates a loss of national sovereignty. To others it doesn't. International power exists in many areas, economic, military and political being three.
It's quite clear theoretically, and worded as such. So theoretical as to be simplistic. Not helpful. The hypothesis does not superimpose on the real world.
I have a better question. It will answer yours. It's the question I asked. Which you've answered with several.
No, not at all. Just seeking a real-world example. Got any?
I'm tempted to believe that based on his record with the China trade war. I'm not really sure what Trump's basis for a tariff war was.
Huh? I am getting confused now- because obviously that’s what Trump and his supporters mean when they use that term “globalism” when they use it in such scary term: according to them, globalism= anti-free market globalism; economic nationalism.
Bannon rejects white nationalism: 'I'm an economic nationalist'
Steve Bannon, Donald Trump's selection for White House chief strategist, says he's an "economic nationalist" but rejects racist and anti-Semitic elements of the nationalist alt-right movement.amp.cnn.com
I checked your definitions. Sounds like a good approach to the world, one followed by both US conservatives and liberals since at least the late 1930s. To be fair, there has always been a passing isolationist (anti- globalist) sentiment in US politics, almost always trumped by reality: the US battleship "Maine" blows up in Havana, and when the dust settles, we own the Phillippines. One can't be a world power, trading with everyone, overthrowing annoying governments, using whatever pressure is necessary -- even foreign aid -- to allow our businesses access to foreign markets, importing workers to do jobs Americans shy away from, and then with a straight face disparage "globalism." People may say "America first," and all our leaders do consider the interests of the country first --albeit in different, debateable ways -- excepting our former prez whose approach was of course "Trump First."Here you go. I answered your question before you asked in this other thread.
What does "maga" mean?
MAGA is just another con by the greatest con man that has ever entered the political arena in America. All he is really for is wealth and power. He used the Rush Limbaugh model all the way to the white house. He plays on the disenfranchised white working class loss of standard of living. He...debatepolitics.com
And, in this one...
The Fascist states of America
From my reading of such laws (when I could) I don't see any "voter suppression." I see exactly what the bills were intended to do. Increase voting security, reduce forms of possible fraud, and ensure people legally entitled to vote can do so. Too often the Democrats and other Leftists frame...
As you can see, this has nothing to do with what brand of TV someone buys. It's about control and money.
Tariffs are always a net negative, unless they're used strategically to enhance national security.
Agreed.
grist.org
