- Joined
- Feb 11, 2023
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
He can be saved no matter, all people can.
Saved from sin is a blessing indeed.He can be saved no matter, all people can.
We don’t need to go over scripture. The answer I think could be a ‘depends’
Is being Trans or Gay a sin?
Because Jesus forgives sin
What say you?
But they must repent which leads back to the question.Can they receive salvation? Yes.
As we all know, 98% of all statistics are made up on the spot.No, it would be medically and scientifically unacceptable, because it's doctors and scientists who are in almost unanimous agreement that you're ****ing wrong.
That's why year after year more and more scientists and medical professionals are voting Democrat.
Why would they need to be "saved" because of the way that God created them?We don’t need to go over scripture. The answer I think could be a ‘depends’
Is being Trans or Gay a sin?
Because Jesus forgives sin
What say you?
Apparently their omniscient (all knowing) and omnipotent (all powerful) god creates defective people and blames them for being defective. In US consumer law their god would be subject to lemon laws, class action lawsuits, possible manslaughter charges if that defects causes somones death, and a recall to fix the product but in the christian religion willfully making a defective product permissible and subject to worshiping the person who does it.Why would they need to be "saved" because of the way that God created them?
That's between God and them.Why would they need to be "saved" because of the way that God created them?
Well then we needn't bother ourselves with the question - right?That's between God and them.
Not really. Its a question that generates discussion.Well then we needn't bother ourselves with the question - right?
God did not create anyone to be gayWhy would they need to be "saved" because of the way that God created them?
We don’t need to go over scripture. The answer I think could be a ‘depends’
Is being Trans or Gay a sin?
Because Jesus forgives sin
What say you?
If Jesus died for our sins, isn't it just a matter of accepting his sacrifice?But they must repent which leads back to the question.
As for transgender, there are OT verses forbidding a man to dress as a woman and a woman to address as a man. This conduct received the strongest condemnation of “abomination,” meaning “inherently evil.”
If someone repents on his death bed, you already have the answer from the Cross to the second thief, possibly named Dismas.If there is no time for repentance - if someone on his deathbed confesses and asks for forgiveness, would that count?
I don't know the answer to that. The sincerity and feelings of remorse of the person might count.
Satan made them gay. GOD made Adam and Eve, but then they sinned.Well then we needn't bother ourselves with the question - right?
So, "Satan" did something that "God" can't undo - right?Satan made them gay. GOD made Adam and Eve, but then they sinned.
If someone repents on his death bed, you already have the answer from the Cross to the second thief, possibly named Dismas.
Wouldn't that mean that the only "rational" time to "repent" is immediately prior to dying as doing so before that time means that there is a possibility of back-sliding and not re-repenting in time?That's an excellent example!
Yes, indeed!
Thanks for the reminder.
A birth defect.Speaking in a moral context, for I'm in no position to speak from a religious one, no, neither is a sin.
Clinically speaking, homosexuality is a kind of birth defect; that's not anything the woke left wants to hear, but if you think about it in a Darwinian sense, aiming one's sexual interest at someone of your gender isn't exactly what you were designed for as it's not an ideal strategy for getting more of your genes into the next generation.
If by trans you mean having gender dysphoria, that's a mental health condition.
Neither status is worthy of any kind of moral condemnation. It's not as if either group makes a choice; neither is either condition, per se, harmful to others.
Wouldn't that mean that the only "rational" time to "repent" is immediately prior to dying as doing so before that time means that there is a possibility of back-sliding and not re-repenting in time?
“He saved others,” they said, “but he can’t save himself! He’s the king of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him.” (Matthew 27:42 NIV)
“One of the criminals who hung there hurled insults at him: “Aren’t you the Messiah? Save yourself and us!” But the other criminal rebuked him. “Don’t you fear God,” he said, “since you are under the same sentence? We are punished justly, for we are getting what our deeds deserve. But this man has done nothing wrong.” (Luke 23:39-41 NIV)
If one believes God is omniscient, then perhaps God would know who would have repented if they lived long enough to do so. Perhaps that counts for something.What sins are, were enumerated by Christ Himself.
He clearly stated the sins that would prevent us from entering the Kingdom of God.
No matter how grievous a sin is, there is always CHRIST's promise for forgiveness.
We can depend on that.
However, there is also a caveat to forgiveness. REPENTANCE.
If there is no time for repentance - if someone on his deathbed confesses and asks for forgiveness, would that count?
I don't know the answer to that. The sincerity and feelings of remorse of the person might count.
In the end, it's ONLY GOD who can Judge.................................. for nothing is hidden from Him.
I appreciate the sincerity of your beliefs.One thing we know for certain - God is no fool.
We have to contemplate on what transpired during that brief time on the cross with the thief.
Obviously, Christ had seen something in the thief which sufficed as an act of "repentance."
Jesus and the two men were nailed to the crosses and waited to die. As the people gathered, weeping could be heard throughout the land. While some cried, others shouted for Jesus to save Himself.
Even then, people were putting conditions on believing in God. If Jesus came down from the cross, they would believe. They were not living by faith, only by sight.
As one man spoke to Jesus and mocked Him, the other man believed Jesus was the Messiah and asked to be remembered by Him.
The man spoke. “Then he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.”
Jesus answered him, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.” (Luke 23:42-43 NIV)
Without the life story of the criminal being recorded, how do we know his belief was real?
Jesus knew, and that is what matters. The thief was ready to change his ways, even at the last moment.
![]()
Why Did Jesus Tell the Thief “Today You Will Be With Me in Paradise”?
Jesus' words to the thief on the cross, "today you will be with me in paradise," may be the most shocking thing he said on Good Friday. Can we really receive salvation at the very last minute? Here's what we know about the thief on the cross, and what Jesus' words meant.www.christianity.com