Can SCOTUS Interfere with a Declaration of Martial Law as of June 28, 2024?

[rahl]

The Constitution didn't go away on J6, though the Trump haters got away with their plan to prevent opposition by Congress to election fraud.

What election fraud?

Trump authorized the National Guard's actions that day.

No he didn’t.

 

[Terryj]

Absolutely I understand why. His nonstop gibberish is to excite his cult followers and create chaos all at the same time. He's a fake pos but one with strong ambitions to crap all over our nation's democracy and to rule her in the shadow of Putin. It saddens me to see so many intelligent followers waste their efforts on that reality carnie barker smothered in warped shifty lawyers. You know, birds of a feather corrupt together.

There are 5 male Supreme Court Justices that now clearly support his mission as of June 28 that threatens our Constitution and democracy. The one female Supreme Court Justice is only half baked in DJT's juices but still yet voted to give him immunity. The rule of law means nothing to them - just to protect their beloved King.

To be perfectly clear again and as I have mentioned several times before, replace DJT's name with Pres Biden's name owning all that's taken place on behalf of DJT - my strong dissent and disgust with Pres Biden would be the same as it exists today for DJT and the SCOTUS lowlife 6.

It's my sincere belief that if Martial Law were declared today for a legitimate reason involving widespread MAGA civil unrest that SCOTUS would try to intervene. MAGA House certainly would intervene.

Once martial law is invoked whether it be locally or nationally then the courts are closed. All jurisdiction falls to the military and military tribunals, however, because military law is based on the UCMJ they can not try a civilian with the same military code as the UCMJ, the Supreme Court can do nothing.