- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 5,289
- Reaction score
- 2,294
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Just wait for our honeymoon:blushing2You know what bothers me most about the research that states this? It, by necessity, requires people who underwent circumcision later in life.
That's just wrong.
Just wait for our honeymoon:blushing2
No you just send down popeye and olive mohelEven trickier if it's a Jewish whale
No you just send down popeye and olive mohel
Before we wore clothes the foreskin protected the penis from abrasions.
If you wear clothes you're not going to get abrasions.
It is said that the foreskin enhances the sensitivity of the organ, resulting in a greatly heightened sexual experience.
The foreskin has very little to almost no significance in protecting the glands considering the foreskin is very thin. In this case it has no effective purpose. The foreskin clogs up bacteria after excretion and sex and so ups the chance of sexual infection/disease transmission, and well, to put it simply, "nob cheese". When you bring into account these health factors and the whole point of the foreskin being there in the first place, its well worth considering circumcision. At most you will experience decreased sexual drive but not enough to notice. Theres no need or very little scientific reasoning to keep the foreskin in place. Unless of course you keep it for the sake of making your little maggot look bigger. :mrgreen:
Protection. The sleeve of tissue known as the foreskin normally covers the glans and protects it from abrasion, drying, callusing (keratinization), and environmental contaminants.
The inner foreskin contains bands of densely innervated, sexually responsive tissue [1]. They constitute a primary erogenous zone of the human penis and are important for realizing the fullness and intensity of sexual response.
4. Gliding action. The foreskin is the only moving part of the penis. During any sexual activity, the foreskin and glans work in unison; their mutual interaction creates a complete sexual response. In heterosexual intercourse, the non-abrasive gliding of the penis in and out of itself within the vagina facilitates smooth and pleasurable intercourse for both partners. Without this gliding action, the corona of the circumcised penis can function as a one-way valve, dragging vaginal lubricants out into the drying air and making artificial lubricants essential for non-painful intercourse
Proper blood flow. The foreskin contains several feet of blood vessels, including the frenular artery and branches of the dorsal artery. The loss of this rich vascularization interrupts normal blood flow to the shaft and glans of the penis, damaging the natural function of the penis and altering its development.
Immunological defense. The soft mucosa of the inner foreskin produces plasma cells, which secrete immunoglobulin antibodies, and antibacterial and antiviral proteins [7, 14], such as the pathogen-killing enzyme called lysozyme [15 and Blue_ArrowD096.gif (140 bytes)see explanation]. All of the human mucosa (the linings of the mouth, eyelids, vagina, foreskin and anus) are the body's first line of defense against disease. This benefit of the foreskin could be one possible explanation why intact men are at lower risk of chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases.
Langerhans cells. These specialized epithelial cells are a component of the immune system and may play a role in protecting the penis from sexually transmitted infections such as HIV (AIDS) [Blue_ArrowD096.gif (140 bytes)see explanation and 14-16, 18].
Because there are so many Langerhans cells in the foreskin, and because these particular cells seem to be excellent at binding to HIV antigens, when the foreskin tears during sex with an HIV-infected woman, there is a very good chance that those blood cells are going to contact and bind to the virus. Langerhans cells are supposed to trigger the immune system's antibody response that fights off the virus; but once HIV gets in, the immune system can't seem to fight it effectively. Once the foreskin is removed, the increased risk of blood exposure and the higher concentration of HIV-receptors in that blood disappears.
Proper lymph flow. The foreskin contains lymphatic vessels, which are necessary for proper lymph flow and immunological functioning.
Apocrine glands. These glands produce pheromones, nature’s invisible yet compelling signals to potential sexual partners. The effect of their absence on human sexual behavior has never been studied [23].
Dartos fascia. This is a smooth muscle sheath that underlies the scrotum, the entire penis and the tip of the foreskin. It is necessary for proper temperature regulation of the genitals (causing these structures to elongate in the heat and shrink in the cold). Approximately half of the Dartos fascia is destroyed by circumcision [7].
15. Natural texture and coloration of the glans. In the intact penis, the glans normally appears moist, shiney, and pinkish-red to dark purple. These visual cues often attract and excite a sexual partner. The glans of a circumcised penis is dry, rough and often light pink to bluish-gray in color [see photos].
Whose penis are they looking at? And please link to a study showing how a moist, shiny, pinkish-red to dark purple glans is sexually attractive to a woman. Because from what women have told me, they find the intact penis to be universally disgusting.
only women in the circumcising U.S.A will say such insulting remarks about men who are exercising their right to remain intact and have you asked those women why they insist that males should undergo a dehumanizing process they would not do themselves?
Sorry chief. You need to check the link I provided. The studies were all good and they all showed intact men had a far larger chance of getting AIDS. They even explained why. I think that topic, factually, is dead. The authors of your ode to the foreskin were wrong about that. Sorry. It is what it is.
Well, this is where I get laid, so their opinion matters. And it's nearly universal. They don't like foreskin and think it's gross. That's good enough for me. And I don't think circumcision is "dehumanizing". I feel pretty human. And of course they will not undergo the process. They don't have foreskin.
it is repeating the same american proganada BS started in yhe 1980s by an american pro-circ doctor
it is not Universal over 85% of the world's males are intact why arenit they lining up to get cut if the opinions of those american woman universal?
if Intact men have higher chances of getting AIDS why is the U.S have the highest rates in the developed world while intact Japan, Europe and Scandianavia have the lowest rates?
and yes cutting off body parts is dehumanising you said it is not and the obvious reason is you are born in acircumcising culture wghich is hostile to men's forskins
Dude, look. It's not "propaganda". It was several, actual, real, scientific studies. And they all showed the same thing. You need to give that one up. Intact men are more likely to get AIDS. It's a fact.
hey are universal opinions in AMERICA. And I'm guessing in other places, as well. And if the 85% who are intact lived here and could not get laid I guarantee you they would be lining up.
You already know the answer. Using your logic, Africa has the highest AIDS rates in the world. Guess what? Intact.
Now that was funny. Kudos.
I think it is high time to start a national campaign to "Save the Hood!"
I got circumcised when my dad kicked my sister in the chin.
Ahhh, the old deep south circumcision.
a. no such thing as heightened enough when it comes to sexMine is heightened enough for me.
actually the fact is Everyone is more likely to get AIDS if you do not wear a condomDude, look. It's not "propaganda". It was several, actual, real, scientific studies. And they all showed the same thing. You need to give that one up. Intact men are more likely to get AIDS. It's a fact.
a. no such thing as heightened enough when it comes to sex
b. you have nothing to base a comparison on, except the fact that you are experiencing a muted version of sex
you do realize sex feels better without a condom than with one
well what if circumcision is akin to putting on a rubber in how much it reduces the pleasure
actually the fact is Everyone is more likely to get AIDS if you do not wear a condom
a condom renders being cut or uncut moot.
who are these people that had sex than decided to chop off some of their junk and than said there was no noticeable difference?Well if you ever choose to get circumcised and do have sex, you will notice, along with all the others that have had the same procedure carried out, that the decrease in sexual drive is not enough to actually notice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?