• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

California: Newsom vetoes bill giving unemployment to illegal immigrants/non-citizens

Roadvirus

Heading North
Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
50,227
Reaction score
41,918
Location
Tennessee, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
California Gov. Gavin Newsom rejected a blueprint to give undocumented immigrants unemployment benefits on Saturday, vetoing a politically sensitive measure that conservatives seized on weeks before the presidential election.


Some would say he's using common sense. But i say he's doing this to appeal to Moderates in 2028 & keeping future political advertising ammo from the hardline GOP.
Why is it illegal immigrants/non-citizens? There's lots of non-citizens working legally in the US. If they pay into the unemployment insurance scheme, are they not entitled to it's benefits?
 
California Gov. Gavin Newsom rejected a blueprint to give undocumented immigrants unemployment benefits on Saturday, vetoing a politically sensitive measure that conservatives seized on weeks before the presidential election.


Some would say he's using common sense. But i say he's doing this to appeal to Moderates in 2028 & keeping future political advertising ammo from the hardline GOP.
Newsom has always been a pro-business moderate and for us California residents we see evidence of this again and again. The mainstream conservative media loves to paint him as some hyper-liberal, left-of-Bernie bleeding heart but in reality Newsom, like every California governor of either party that we’ve had for decades, is something of a centrist. To be successful leading our state, you’ve got to be pro-business, socially compassionate but only to a limit, and have deep pro-environmental policies.
 
California Gov. Gavin Newsom rejected a blueprint to give undocumented immigrants unemployment benefits on Saturday, vetoing a politically sensitive measure that conservatives seized on weeks before the presidential election.


Some would say he's using common sense. But i say he's doing this to appeal to Moderates in 2028 & keeping future political advertising ammo from the hardline GOP.
I hope they criminalize the employers that will continue to collect it from them.
 
That's a shame, and I don't agree but, Newsom has done similar before. I think the truth is, you only care because it's election season.
 
California Gov. Gavin Newsom rejected a blueprint to give undocumented immigrants unemployment benefits on Saturday, vetoing a politically sensitive measure that conservatives seized on weeks before the presidential election.


Some would say he's using common sense. But i say he's doing this to appeal to Moderates in 2028 & keeping future political advertising ammo from the hardline GOP.
I'd say you are correct. These far left democrats suddenly have shifted positions, Why would they do that? We all know it's temporary and after getting elected they will return to crazy policies.
 
I'd say you are correct. These far left democrats suddenly have shifted positions, Why would they do that? We all know it's temporary and after getting elected they will return to crazy policies.
You're very ignorant on Newsom. He's most criticized for not being progressive enough. He vetoed two housing bills last year as well. So, close but no cigar for you!

Doing a bit of research helps make things credible although lately it seems MAGAs don't care about being credible, lies work just as well if not better, am I right?
 
You're very ignorant on Newsom. He's most criticized for not being progressive enough.

That's because he's purposefully steering away from the label. He's got 2028 in mind & he'll want to look good to Moderates & Indies.
 
That's because he's purposefully steering away from the label. He's got 2028 in mind & he'll want to look good to Moderates & Indies.
For the last four years? He's always like this. I think you all are grasping at straws personally but go ahead. I'm not thrilled with Newsom for the opposite reasons as you, he's letting me down.
 
That's because he's purposefully steering away from the label. He's got 2028 in mind & he'll want to look good to Moderates & Indies.
He’s been like this for the entirety of his term. Your wacky conspiracy theory is nothing more than a false perception given to out-of-staters from AM radio or Tucker’s show. The reality is that he like all of his predecessors hews near the center and tends to adopt pro-business positions on any matter not strictly related to environmental matters.
 
For the last four years? He's always like this. I think you all are grasping at straws personally but go ahead. I'm not thrilled with Newsom for the opposite reasons as you, he's letting me down.

We haven't had a Californian as president since Reagan, and I hope that losing streak continues.

MAGA.
 
Kamala on fracking.


So which do you want, USA the leader in oil production and lower gasoline prices, or enforcement OF the so called fracking ban and higher gasoline prices? I am guessing that no matter which position an incoming president chooses, if they are a Democrat, you will find a way to demonize them, whereas if they are MAGA, you will laud them as heroes and patriots.
It has nothing to do with the environmental hazards of hydraulic fracturing in your mind, it has to do with your cult membership in MAGA.
 
You must have missed his last years in office.

Reagan was mentally impaired at best, not mentally disabled.

There is a difference.... apparently:

“Joe Biden became mentally impaired. Kamala was born that way. She was born that way. And if you think about it, only a mentally disabled person could have allowed this to happen to our country.”


MAGA.
 
Reagan was mentally impaired at best, not mentally disabled.

There is a difference.... apparently:

“Joe Biden became mentally impaired. Kamala was born that way. She was born that way. And if you think about it, only a mentally disabled person could have allowed this to happen to our country.”


MAGA.
Unless I completely misunderstood your post, here’s a tip: don’t sign off with MAGA after linking to an article that shows Trump acting like a jerk.
 
I'd say you are correct. These far left democrats suddenly have shifted positions, Why would they do that? We all know it's temporary and after getting elected they will return to crazy policies.
Translation, “far left Democrats” are more likely to wittingly employ an illegal resident not authorized legally to work in the U.S. than Republicans are likely to,
 
Why is it illegal immigrants/non-citizens? There's lots of non-citizens working legally in the US. If they pay into the unemployment insurance scheme, are they not entitled to it's benefits?
The story indicates that this is the 3rd of 3 bills that were recently vetoed. This particular bill only addresses illegal aliens.
 
The story indicates that this is the 3rd of 3 bills that were recently vetoed. This particular bill only addresses illegal aliens.
Ah. I guess I was mislead by the second paragraph...
"It was the third bill aimed at supporting noncitizens that Newsom has vetoed in as many weeks,..."
 
Sure. He was a real loser with that Berlin Wall speech. :rolleyes:
No, that was a winner. But his support of mass murder in Central America, made him a loser.
 
Back
Top Bottom