- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Congratulations leftists, the rule of law means nothing to you and once again the state of California leads the way showing again why California should never be allowed to elect our President due to its population.
What do you call someone who wants to strip his political enemies of their basic rights, such as the right to vote? Why do you hate America and our constitution so much?
What do you call someone who wants to strip his political enemies of their basic rights, such as the right to vote? Why do you hate America and our constitution so much?
California judge refuses to bring back Trump's sanctuary cities ban | Fox News
Congratulations leftists, the rule of law means nothing to you and once again the state of California leads the way showing again why California should never be allowed to elect our President due to its population.
An American conservative saying "rule of law" is an oxymoron these days.
What is it about the term illegal and rule of law that you don't understand. This thread is about sanctuary cities and those illegals have no right to vote but apparently in California that fact is ignored as is Immigration law which is the LAW OF THE LAND.
California judge refuses to bring back Trump's sanctuary cities ban | Fox News
Congratulations leftists, the rule of law means nothing to you and once again the state of California leads the way showing again why California should never be allowed to elect our President due to its population.
Actually this thread seems more about your desire to silence your political opponents because you're sour. What other basic rights would you like to strip from your fellow countrymen? Perhaps we should send you to Mexico instead if you hate our way of life so much.
Californians being allowed to vote is THE LAW OF THE LAND.
And so it appears that this Conservative fully supports the Federal Leviathan, and would have it so that local people cannot make their own laws and procedures. This Conservative appears to favor rule from Washington as far superior to rule from local sources.
Goodness!
You have every right to make your own laws, but what you don't have is the right to violate FEDERAL LAW and have FEDERAL TAXPAYERS fund your personal choice laws.
What do you call someone who wants to strip his political enemies of their basic rights, such as the right to vote? Why do you hate America and our constitution so much?
California has not made illegal aliens officially able to vote. Yet.What do you call someone who wants to strip his political enemies of their basic rights, such as the right to vote? Why do you hate America and our constitution so much?
California judge refuses to bring back Trump's sanctuary cities ban | Fox News
Congratulations leftists, the rule of law means nothing to you and once again the state of California leads the way showing again why California should never be allowed to elect our President due to its population.
...says the guy who believes that Californians shouldn't be allowed to vote.
You have every right to make your own laws, but what you don't have is the right to violate FEDERAL LAW and have FEDERAL TAXPAYERS fund your personal choice laws.
So what part of Immigration Law don't you understand, obviously the term illegal. Do you have laws regarding immigration in your country? Do you enforce those laws?
Until that happens, they are still part of America and do not have the right to fence themselves off from federal laws.
Well if the locals have 'every right' to make their own laws and policies, but those can be rendered invalid by those inside the Beltway, why do we even have local government? Why do the states exist?
Now I agree and support the US Constitution, and understand that any legitimate federal law must "in accordance with the foregoing powers" as listed in Article I Section 8, but I also understand the meaning of the 10th Amendment.
So whether California wants to object to questionable federal law, I think they have that right. Micro-managing the immigration question has never worked well for the feds, and that is not likely to change.
I favor local rule over micro-management from thousands of miles away.
...says the guy who believes that Californians shouldn't be allowed to vote.
wikipediaThe Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land.[1] It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied. Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.[2] In essence, it is a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain national acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with national law.
Until that happens, they are still part of America and do not have the right to fence themselves off from federal laws. Allowing illegal immigration as a border state affects the entire country. Sanctuary tells illegals to "Get here and we will protect you at taxpayer expense".
Sorry, but that dog doesn't hunt.
So that is what you get out of California violating the Immigration Laws of the United States? Do you believe ILLEGAL Immigrants deserve taxpayer dollars to live in this country? Who is denying CALIFORNIANS the right to vote? Are ILLEGALS Californians??
Send me to Mexico? Why? I was born and raised in this country and am here legally. You seem to want to enforce only the laws you agree with. Have you bothered to check the Immigration Laws in the country you live in now? Maybe you should pay closer attention to the problems those laws are causing but like most liberals if it doesn't affect you it doesn't exist and isn't a problem, right?
California has not made illegal aliens officially able to vote. Yet.
Illegals can't vote.
They're not. This has been covered ad nauseam. Sessions wants local police, who do not fall under the purview of immigration, to carry out deportation duties.
And so it appears that this Conservative fully supports the Federal Leviathan, and would have it so that local people cannot make their own laws and procedures. This Conservative appears to favor rule from Washington as far superior to rule from local sources.
Goodness!
Until that happens, they are still part of America and do not have the right to fence themselves off from federal laws. Allowing illegal immigration as a border state affects the entire country. Sanctuary tells illegals to "Get here and we will protect you at taxpayer expense".
Sorry, but that dog doesn't hunt.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?