in ten years america will be weary of the duck and cover drills and too poor to buy duct tape and placstic
and will be weary from the wmds that keep coming at you
america will be weary of the duck and cover drills and too poor to buy duct tape and placstic
and will be weary from the wmds that keep coming at you
Billo_Really said:It's getting lower by the day. He should be starting another war anytime soon.
Billo_Really said:It's getting lower by the day. He should be starting another war anytime soon.
Canuck said:Bush said "the war on terror would last 10 years or more and have many fronts"
IF you think you are only in iraq your have some heavy insulation from the world friend
either that or your smoking to much whacky tobacco
iran syria north korea phillipines are just a few places where american forces are fighting right now
routine flybys in iran and syria are happening now
your military jets fly intel. missions into iran and syria
itelligence missions have already been set up
Excuse me but disagreeing with Bush is NOT anti-American! I think you wrote that comment because the author that you were referring to was from Canada and it angers you that a Canadian is disagreeing with Bush.purplehaze said:Could you share with me your reasoning behind this statement? Or do you just hit reply and insert random anti-american text.
Don't you think it's more than coincidental that as Bush's ratings spiral downward there's another "terror alert" to distract us away from his constant failures? The "Boy Who Cried Wolf" syndrome will come back to haunt us one day when we really are attacked.Billo_Really said:It's getting lower by the day. He should be starting another war anytime soon.
With the way Bush runs the country we probably don't have money for 10 years of war in Iraq. Maybe communist China will raise our credit limit?Canuck said:Bush said "the war on terror would last 10 years or more and have many fronts"
With all due respect, what right do we have to invade Syria? We do not own this planet, we are not the planet's military police!Deegan said:We should have taken Syria, this is in retrospect of course, but I really believe it should have been the next step after Afghan. Iran would have been cut off, as Saddam would have controled his border with them, and then the pressure could have been put on from there. I really do feel I have been played lately, and it sucks!
What's going to happen if Russia decides to get involved on behalf of Iran or Syria. They already have a military pact with China. So instead of fighting insurgents with RPG's, we are looking at a force that could possibly kick our ass, bigtime. I certainly hope things don't get that far. I don't think they really will since China owns about half this country anyway. But what if.Originally Posted by 26 X World Champs:
With all due respect, what right do we have to invade Syria? We do not own this planet, we are not the planet's military police!
Can't you understand that America has become the most hated country on this planet because of Bush and Iraq? That translates into our having created MORE terrorists, not less and more enemies, not less!
I'm kinda hoping America will find its backbone and get this guy in the un-employment line. But we have a pussified Congress with sheeps on both sides of the aisle. And its our fault it got this way. The nice thing is, if were the problem, were also the solution.Originally Posted by 26 X World Champs:
Don't you think it's more than coincidental that as Bush's ratings spiral downward there's another "terror alert" to distract us away from his constant failures? The "Boy Who Cried Wolf" syndrome will come back to haunt us one day when we really are attacked.
Makes me worry what bull$hit crisis he will concoct next week when Karl Rove gets indicted?
ban.the.electoral.college said:That's what I'm talking about. But, I don't think many people realize where this thing is going. Bush is trying to start a ****ing world war.
AK_Conservative said:Im am doing a repost here from the Impeach Bush thread becuase i think it has a realivance here!
In reguards to Bush bringing upon his low approval rating on himself
In some aspects yes, but the way i see it is this.. Now this is ENTIRELY an opinion!
At the beggining of the war, a vast majority of people did support it! The media provided stories about what was going on! Since then, the media and others (including Michael Moore) have set out to deminish the Bush administration, and so far it has worked, mostly becuase Bush is a weak president! The media STRIVES to find stories that demote the administration! What they do bring to the table continues to do this! They have even gone to the level to publish false stories (i.e. Dan rather and Bush's NG service, newsweek and the Koran, and escalating abuses situations [13 at GITMO when technically only 5 so called "abuse" situations happened, though i do not consider them abuse])! Even when the publishers come out and say they were wrong, it still has a drastic impact upon the president, but mainly the soldiers (i.e. 17 killed american soldier due to newsweeks proclaimation). Now take into consideration what going into iraq has benifited us, iraq and the world (i.e. Freedom for iraqi's, toppling a horrendous dictator, taking steps to improve the middle east, ect). How much of that is presented in the media? If the media would promote that, Bush's approval rating would be better than it is! But the media does not care to do that! If media would promote this, our president would be looked upon better, and with more intelligence!
Now take this into Consideration: If Clinton, Gore, or Kerry had done the same thing, The media would not be presenting information like we see now! We probably wouldnt even be getting all aspects of it. When clinton bombed Iraq a day or two before his impeachment (Operation Desert Fox), there was not as much media coverage on that! It could have been the fact that the impeachment was going on, who knows!
The main reason for all this blabber was to say that how we reflect on our president is what the media brings to us! That is why i say Bush didnt bring this upon himself, the media did!
Now some may say the media is a great thing for america, which in theory it is, but nowadays, it isnt! It is more concerned with ratings than True analysis! Today, it is very hard to trust anything that comes out in a national paper, especially if it is political!
Excuse me but disagreeing with Bush is NOT anti-American!
Isn't it anti-American to suggest that disagreeing with your government is anti-American? YIKES!
in ten years america will be weary of the duck and cover drills and too poor to buy duct tape and placstic
and will be weary from the wmds that keep coming at you
american natl gaurd are not real soldiers
they are weekend warrior paint ball boys
trying to do a man's job
dont tempt us
when the black watchman comes
you will here bagpipes and be stunned
lulled into a sleep of apathy
while all your cities errupt into flame you will be sending the missles to ruusia
and other parts of the world
while our diplomats tell you its terrorists
when the plug gets pulled your lights will go out
have no doubt
the elite soldiers in the Canadian un regimental brigade are flawless
they will make the natl gaurd look like thegangster kids that they are
I think you wrote that comment because the author that you were referring to was from Canada and it angers you that a Canadian is disagreeing with Bush.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?