- Joined
- Dec 14, 2006
- Messages
- 7,588
- Reaction score
- 468
- Location
- Western Europe
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
bbc said:Bulgaria's President Georgi Purvanov has suggested that a nuclear reactor deemed unsafe by the EU could be restarted to help cover gas shortages.
bbc said:Kozloduy supplied about half of Bulgaria's electricity, before four of its six reactors were closed amid safety concerns. The US department of energy described Kozloduy as "one of the world's most dangerous nuclear installations".
lol, LET THEM! the USA ought to set up a nuclear plant in Bulgaria just to tick everyone off!
lol, LET THEM! the USA ought to set up a nuclear plant in Bulgaria just to tick everyone off!
Long as they keep those in EU and out of the Americas, especially Central.... Oh well.As if France will ever allow that. France OWNS the nuclear energy sector. :lol:
But this article wasnt talking about that, but some old soviet reactor... YIAHIIIKES.
what...a soviet reactor? and OLD soviet reactor? Oh Hellz no, we can't have that! Blast it them!As if France will ever allow that. France OWNS the nuclear energy sector. :lol:
But this article wasnt talking about that, but some old soviet reactor... YIAHIIIKES.
Long as they keep those in EU and out of the Americas, especially Central.... Oh well.
what...a soviet reactor? and OLD soviet reactor? Oh Hellz no, we can't have that! Blast it them!
Was who ever a threat to what?Were we ever a threat?:shock:
Then maybe the EU should sack up and do something about Russia being a petulant bitch.
If EU imposed sanctions, Russia may use that as justification to kick their ass.There are plenty of nuclear reactors waiting to be restarted instead of decommissioned. Thats the ONLY short term solution we have, as for medium term, Europe is steadily and have been for a long time increasing energy production in form of renewable sources, wave, sun and wind for example. The pace of this development will probably increase as a result of the Russian issue.
Or then we actually have another alternative, economic sanctions. Europe is the greatest trade partner of Russia, and they would be strangled if we used to correct trade sanctions on them to get their act together.. But by doing so we would risk higher likelihood of war as Russian would be more and more desperate..
There are plenty of nuclear reactors waiting to be restarted instead of decommissioned. Thats the ONLY short term solution we have, as for medium term, Europe is steadily and have been for a long time increasing energy production in form of renewable sources, wave, sun and wind for example. The pace of this development will probably increase as a result of the Russian issue.
Or then we actually have another alternative, economic sanctions. Europe is the greatest trade partner of Russia, and they would be strangled if we used to correct trade sanctions on them to get their act together.. But by doing so we would risk higher likelihood of war as Russian would be more and more desperate..
If EU imposed sanctions, Russia may use that as justification to kick their ass.
Then I guess they should start them up, shouldn't they?
This entire issue stems from Russia refusing to deliver fuel. If they won't deliver, then Bulgaria will do what it has to do. If the EU doesn't want that to happen, they should offer Bulgaria a better option.
Well.. I dont think anyone want to see such dangerous reactors being started up. its not wise of Bulgaria either its their asses on the line, their fallouts etc.
There are lots of safer unused nuclear reactors in Europe, but the grid of Bulgaria is not well connected with the places where they are(France, Germany, UK for example).
So what do you suggest they do?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?