• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bud Light Backlash Is Hurting Other Anheuser-Busch Brands, Data Shows

Because the left never boycotts products because of who the product associates with, right? :rolleyes:

You just run decades long campaigns to sap ad revenue from every conservative TV program and business. It's not enough for the left to simply boycott a product for yourself, either. The left needs to make the product unavailable for everyone. You don't like a speaker at an event? Try to cancel the event. That's your speed.

Or to put it in leftist terms: Imagine rioting on campus because a small Jewish man wants to speak?
I am not a fan of cancel culture regardless of who it comes from. I didn't like when I was in high school and it was the Religious Right that engaged in it and I don't like it when the Cultural Left engages in it today - some of the tactics of the Cultural Left remind me of a watered down version of Chinese Cultural Revolution.

However, this particular comparison you are making is pretty flawed. Generally when a conservative host loses ad revenue, it's because they said something bigoted or racist and companies no longer want to be associated with them. In fact, I can't think of a single time it has happened when that wasn't the case.

You are comparing that to people refusing to drink Bud Light because they used a trans influencer in an ad campaign.

In 20 years, people are going to look back on the anti-trans stuff of today just like we look back on the anti-gay campaigns of 20 and 30 years ago and the anti-black campaigns of 30 years before that. Bigots are never are the right side of history and they aren't today either.
 
Nobody is canceling Bud Light, nobody is gluing themselves to the floor in the beer aisle to stop others from buying Bud Light. Choosing to not buy a product isn't cancel culture.

Celebrity endorsements traditionally are meant to attract people to the brand who want to be like, or identify with the celebrity. Less than 1% of beer drinkers identify with or want to be like Dylan Mulvaney.

Whenever the left decides to do a national boycott of Chick-fil-A the franchises across the country run out of chicken and the lines wrap around the block... if the left put their money where their mouth is, as conservatives do, a bunch of conservatives choosing not to buy Bud Light should result in Bud Light flying off the shelves... and yet...

So the question is not whether or not Conservatives are trying to cancel anyone, the question is why aren't all of you Dylan Mulvaney fans buying up all the Bud Light, you closeted transphobes.... 😆
Obviously you missed kid rockhead shooting a case of Bud light and Travis twitt claiming he will no longer have anything to do with the brand and both encouraging a boycott by their few fans.

It's not a matter of support but a matter of canceling a product because someone you don't like endorsed it. Like not buying coke products because the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter and seditionist buys diet coke to have with his 10 cheeseburgers and fries.

I still buy coke products but I like the coke zero. I tried chicken fil a in Atlanta and wasn't impressed. KFC for me when I get the urge for fried chicken.

So the real question is why are cons for canceling a product just because someone they don't agree with endorces it. Childishly hypocritical from the wingnuts who rail about cancel culture.
 
Busch beer had her promote their products on her social media channels. That's it. Are you essentially arguing that companies shouldn't hire transgender people to promote their products ever?
Let me put it this way. If you had a product that was mostly purchased by Progressives would you hire Trump to endorse your product?
 
Let me put it this way. If you had a product that was mostly purchased by Progressives would you hire Trump to endorse your product?
Lets look at it this way: Dylan Mulvaney is not a controversial person. She makes goofy musical videos (musical theater person) and talks about her gender transition. She doesn't say anything remotely controversial. All what she argues for is to be nice to transgender people. Apparently, this is a tall glass to swallow for the right and worthy of getting out your guns and destroying beer cans. The problem here is that Republicans think being transgender is political in itself.

It would be a logical fallacy to compare Trump to Dylan. Trump was impeached twice by the House, motivated an insurrection, and has a long history of making controversial statements. Dylan simply makes goofy videos and argues for kindess and undestanding. The fact that the right got upset over her promoting Busch beer over her social media platforms, just shows you how transphobic they are. There is just no way around that. Why would anybody get upset about a message about being kind?
 
Obviously you missed kid rockhead shooting a case of Bud light and Travis twitt claiming he will no longer have anything to do with the brand and both encouraging a boycott by their few fans.

You blow up your own argument in the span of one sentence. The second half of the sentence shows why your two examples aren't responsible for the drop in Bud Light sales.

Also, as per my argument, Nothing either of them did is stopping you from buying Bud Light in support.

It's not a matter of support but a matter of canceling a product because someone you don't like endorsed it. Like not buying coke products because the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter and seditionist buys diet coke to have with his 10 cheeseburgers and fries.

Uh, no. It's like not buying diet coke because they made the guy you hate a spokesperson for the brand.

Also, nice utterly unhinged frothing ramble. Truly it makes you seem totally sane.

I still buy coke products but I like the coke zero. I tried chicken fil a in Atlanta and wasn't impressed. KFC for me when I get the urge for fried chicken.

Diet coke didn't make the guy a spokesperson, didn't put his face on the can.

Also KFC over Chick-fil-A? You don't have to be completely wrong about everything, ya know? :LOL:

Also, your personal anecdote means exactly jack shit. You know as well as I do the efforts from your side of the political aisle to cancel chick-fil-a, from leftist cities refusing to allow the restaurant to open stores there, do idiots picketing outside of locations.

Your awful taste in chicken doesn't undo the reality.

So the real question is why are cons for canceling a product just because someone they don't agree with endorces it. Childishly hypocritical from the wingnuts who rail about cancel culture.

Nobody is canceling products, they just aren't buying it. Nothing is stopping you from buying it. Your side is the one who wants to deny everyone access because you don't like something of want someone to speak, not us.

Canceling is attempting to deny others access to something you don't like... that is the left wings method.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
I am not a fan of cancel culture regardless of who it comes from. I didn't like when I was in high school and it was the Religious Right that engaged in it and I don't like it when the Cultural Left engages in it today - some of the tactics of the Cultural Left remind me of a watered down version of Chinese Cultural Revolution.

What was the religious right canceling?

However, this particular comparison you are making is pretty flawed. Generally when a conservative host loses ad revenue, it's because they said something bigoted or racist and companies no longer want to be associated with them. In fact, I can't think of a single time it has happened when that wasn't the case.

All you are doing here is endorsing cancel culture as long as it is in line with your own personal views. If the left determines they are offended by the statement of a conservative, then it's OK to pressure advertisers to drop them, right? That's cancel culture.

Deciding to not buy a product anymore is not cancel culture.

You are comparing that to people refusing to drink Bud Light because they used a trans influencer in an ad campaign.

No, I'm not. I'm saying they are NOT the same.

In 20 years, people are going to look back on the anti-trans stuff of today just like we look back on the anti-gay campaigns of 20 and 30 years ago and the anti-black campaigns of 30 years before that. Bigots are never are the right side of history and they aren't today either.

Nope, 20 years from now we will look back at the anti-trans thing the way we look at Eugenics and Lobotomies. The supporters are destroying young people's lives with a religious zeal, and will leave millions of children with lives and bodies in shambles, unable to have sex in adulthood, grossly disfigured and/or chemically sterilized.

And women who aren't even trans have their college scholarship hopes dashed by guys who couldn't manage to make a team as their biological sex. Women who don't want to dress in front of men have no choice because bleeding heart idiots don't think what those women want or need is as important as the dude who wants women to see his genitals.

20 years from now you will try everything in your power to distance yourself from this madness.
 
What was the religious right canceling?



All you are doing here is endorsing cancel culture as long as it is in line with your own personal views. If the left determines they are offended by the statement of a conservative, then it's OK to pressure advertisers to drop them, right? That's cancel culture.

Deciding to not buy a product anymore is not cancel culture.



No, I'm not. I'm saying they are NOT the same.



Nope, 20 years from now we will look back at the anti-trans thing the way we look at Eugenics and Lobotomies. The supporters are destroying young people's lives with a religious zeal, and will leave millions of children with lives and bodies in shambles, unable to have sex in adulthood, grossly disfigured and/or chemically sterilized.

And women who aren't even trans have their college scholarship hopes dashed by guys who couldn't manage to make a team as their biological sex. Women who don't want to dress in front of men have no choice because bleeding heart idiots don't think what those women want or need is as important as the dude who wants women to see his genitals.

20 years from now you will try everything in your power to distance yourself from this madness.
This is silly at this point.

1. So far this year, GOP controlled state legislatures have introduced over 300 anti-trans bills. Prior to their obsession with Trans people, it was the everything they didn't like is "CRT". A few years before that, the concern was the absurd notion that Sharia Law was being established in small towns. Before that, it was same sex marriage and how they thought it would lead to men marrying animals and other absurdities. Prior to that, in the wake of 9/11, Muslims in general had their wrath, with campaigns against supposed "Ground Zero Mosques". Prior to that, it was the supposed "Gay and Lesbian Agenda". That was about the time I was in High School and the Religious Right believed that students were being indoctrinated into homosexuality by insidious gay activists in high schools. Prior to that, it was gays were responsible for the AIDs epidemic, and prior to that, it was just everything the cultural right at the time didn't like was "Communism" - example, seat belt laws were Communism. For my entire life, the right in America has always had to have some culture war whipping post to get angry about. It is worse today of course due to social media and the fact that this is what happens when a political party has a culture of cruelty. Now, of course you won't see it because I bet if someone were to have asked you in the 1980s about AIDs and gay people, you would have touted the cultural right's point of view at the time. Had they asked you 15 years ago what you thought of same sex marriage, you would have touted the cultural right's line on it at the time, and so on and so forth. You guys spend your lives on the wrong side of history on every civil and human right's issue, yet you never seem to catch to that for some reason - maybe there is some genetic or neurological explanation for this, I don't know. (which is why this debate is pointless with y'all. In a few years you will move on to another culture war whipping post while telling yourself that this time it's different - a broken record)

2. Yes, male to female trans athletes can be an issue at the elite level in many sports. Most people agree on that one. It's a biological unfairness at that point, but we are only talking about the top .01% of athletes where such an advantage comes into play. Moreover, there is no reason to say it can't be dealt with by sports boards just like every other issue involving athletics are. That said, I don't think that male to female trans athletes should be allowed to compete at the elite level where they have a biological advantage.

3. Just about everyone believes in cancel culture, it's only a question of where the line is drawn. For example, if an MSNBC host started promoting holocaust denial, virtually everyone would say that person has no business being on the air with that garbage and they would lose advertisers. They would get fired and would likely not find another major outlet to employ them. Similarly, if someone had a show and said that they believe that gay people should be imprisoned, they would lose advertisers and the company employing them would almost certainly fire them because they would not want to associated with them. That is reality, so the question is not whether people agree or disagree with cancel culture, because virtually everyone agrees with it at some level. The question is only where the line is.
 
Because cons are against cancel culture. 😆 🤣 😂 When they aren't banning books I guess.

If the cancel culture shoe fits with you Trumpsters.

We in the MAGAsphere are adamantly against certain aspects of cancel culture, like lib-prog, i.e. Democrat, injunctions against molesting women, shooting left-wing protesters, occasionally storming the Capitol and Trump purloining classified secrets being fair examples.

The rest is fair game.

MAGA.
 
It's not going to hurt InBev/AB, no matter how much you insist that it might. They'll lay low for a while or come up with some frat-boy themed marketing blitz and all will be well.

Remember, folks: AB/Bud brands survived a decade of a total ban on alcohol sales in the US. This is nothing to them, even if they decide to completely kill off or rebrand Bud Light.
LOL the over 20% drop in Bud Light sales in a matter of weeks over this is unprecedented. Sure, AB will recover- and no one ever said they wouldnt, but theyve learned a hard lesson when it comes to marketing their products.
Mulvaney simply promoted Busch beer on her social media platforms for the month of March. That's it. Why is that a problem?
Read what I wrote in the OP with regards to celebrity endorsements again.

Let me put it this way. If you had a product that was mostly purchased by Progressives would you hire Trump to endorse your product?
LMAO! Perfect analogy. Pity the wokeists are tone deaf when it comes to it. :LOL:
 
LOL the over 20% drop in Bud Light sales in a matter of weeks over this is unprecedented. Sure, AB will recover- and no one ever said they wouldnt, but theyve learned a hard lesson when it comes to marketing their products.

Yeah they - and we - learned the degree to which violent ideation and has entered the mainstream of MAGA-Land consciousness. Learned more about how warped and paranoid some people have become as a result of drinking from a firehose of misinformation.

Something for MAGAts to hoot, holler, and high five each other about for sure.
 
This is silly at this point.

1. So far this year, GOP controlled state legislatures have introduced over 300 anti-trans bills... whipping post while telling yourself that this time it's different - a broken record)

They are not "anti-Trans" bills, they are anti-genital mutilation and anti-chemical castration of children bills. Adults who want to destroy their bodies to try and chase a delusion can feel free to do so.

We are here warning them that emotions change, genital mutilation and sterilization don't. While I don't care how badly an adult ruins their life with surgeries -- surgeries that I guarantee 90+% of those idiots in support have never seen -- doing it to children when it is KNOWN that mast would otherwise learn to be comfortable in their own bodies, is attrocious.

Since I can't show you the pictures of what these surgeries do, I'll explain it....

Male to "female" bottom surgeries: Castration, and the penis is cored and inverted IF the original penis of sufficient size to make a simulated cervix. If not, a segment of the patient's colon is removed and grafted on to the inverted penis. Infection rate is high, as is permanent numbness. Many end up incontinent as a result for the rest of their lives. This is not reversible... all they can manage in "reversing" surgery is another round of mutilation.

Female to "Male" bottom surgeries: Hysterectomy, the skin and fat of a patient's forearm of thigh is fully removed and grafted between the patient's legs. The fake penis looks more like a baloney than a penis, and often results in infection, and peeing out between the sutures rather than the end of the fake penis because the body sees this surgery as a would, and the tube will often heal shut leaving nowhere for the urine to go but out through the sutures. These patients are guaranteed to never have a real sex life, never experience an orgasm. This is not reversible.

Female to "male" top surgery: Breasts removed. permanent, irreversible loss of biological purpose, left with significant scarring.

Puberty Blockers: Young children are administered a drug that is given to adults who are convicted of sex crimes. In adults the process is called "chemical castration". In children the process is not reversible if the child takes the chemical through the body's normal puberty. These children will never develop normal adult sex organs because that is what the drug does. If used throughout puberty there is no reversal, you can't kick start a normal puberty after that. Even if treatment is canceled before the normal puberty has finished, they will still end up with underdeveloped genitalia that will most likely be non-functional. Again, this is not reversable.

But when all of those children that would normally grow out of their body dysmorphia come of age, and realize they made a mistake, everyone who supports it now will be running the other way, wanting no part is the fallout, but it will all be on them anyway for defending this monstrous bullshit.

2. Yes, male to female trans athletes can be an issue at the elite level in many sports. Most people agree on that one.

Most people also don't support genital mutilation and chemical castration of children either...

3. Just about everyone believes in cancel culture, it's only a question of where the line is drawn.

The baser instincts of our Id want to silence those we don't agree with. Free speech is built on the expectation that in the end the truth defeats the lie. It's never an easy fight, but it is a necessary fight. Silencing those who have beliefs you don't agree with never solves the issue or change minds, all that means is that one day when they take power they can cancel you and you will have no moral standing to object.
 
Last edited:
Let me put it this way. If you had a product that was mostly purchased by Progressives would you hire Trump to endorse your product?

We don't even need to imagine. Look what happened to Tesla and Twitter when the progressives found out that Musk was only mostly progressive.
 
They are not "anti-Trans" bills, they are anti-genital mutilation and anti-chemical castration of children bills. Adults who want to destroy their bodies to try and chase a delusion can feel free to do so.
That simply isn't true. There have been many bills introduced that banned trans therapies even for adults. Moreover, there have also been numerous bathroom bills, bills that banned teachers from using student's preferred pronouns and so on.

A perfect example of the GOP's culture of cruelty is this Mother's Day message:

u2vj38fr4yza1.jpg
 
Let me put it this way. If you had a product that was mostly purchased by Progressives would you hire Trump to endorse your product?
Why would anyone have a product for sale that caters to lib-progs, i.e. Democrats?

Back in 2020 during the China-virus, I had the idiotic idea of stocking and selling a few pro-Biden items on my site rather than the typical FJB flags thinking it might increase my profit which had suffered on account of closing down the dozen or so Trump pop-up kiosks I had going, but it only lasted one day. The abuse suffered from the disaffected on my site caused me to immediately remove those goods from sale and apologize profusely, claiming my non-existent, angry and now estranged son maliciously tampered with my site.

MAGA.
 
That simply isn't true. There have been many bills introduced that banned trans therapies even for adults. Moreover, there have also been numerous bathroom bills, bills that banned teachers from using student's preferred pronouns and so on.

A perfect example of the GOP's culture of cruelty is this Mother's Day message:

u2vj38fr4yza1.jpg

Maybe you are new to civics, but a meme isn't a law...
 
LOL the over 20% drop in Bud Light sales in a matter of weeks over this is unprecedented. Sure, AB will recover- and no one ever said they wouldnt, but theyve learned a hard lesson when it comes to marketing their products.

Read what I wrote in the OP with regards to celebrity endorsements again.
What is controversial about Dylan Mulvaney?
 
Maybe you are new to civics, but a meme isn't a law...
Everyone knows a meme is not a law. However, why would a political party share such a meme that uses Mother's Day to denigrate an entire group of Americans other than to be cruel? Let's be honest here, why do it otherwise?

Moreover, again, they aren't just trying to ban gender affirming care for minors, they are doing so for adults as well:



There are dozens of examples just like those just this year alone.

Of course, it's not just that, Republican lawmakers have gone so far as to ask trans women in hearings if they have a penis. https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out...earing-asks-transgender-woman-penis-rcna70787

Again, this is what happens when a political party embraces as a culture of cruelty.

Let me help you out here, because I know for some of y'all, going against anything on right is just heresy to you, but you can say: "While I do not believe that children should get gender affirming surgeries or puberty blockers, I think that some of what the GOP is engaging in, particularly at the state level, when they target adults, is reprehensible and won't be judged well by history."

You see, one can actually decide things for themselves.
 
Last edited:
Everyone knows a meme is not a law. However, why would a political party share such a meme that uses Mother's Day to denigrate an entire group of Americans other than to be cruel? Let's be honest here, why do it otherwise?

"An entire group" of how many? :rolleyes:

We don't support men pretending to be women. Get over it. It's men in women face. It's like defending white people who come out as black and wear blackface for Black History month.

As I said, you don't seem to understand the appalling "care" that you are supporting here.

Moreover, again, they aren't just trying to ban gender affirming care for minors, they are doing so for adults as well:



Would you support a law that allowed doctors to remove limbs from people with body dysmorphia? I mean, technically you do already. But as I said, I wouldn't support this law so long as my tax dollars were never used to to help pay for this cosmetic surgery or to pay for the psychological fallout and medical bills that come from this surgery.

If people want to ruin their perfectly good body to appease their mental illness then they can do it on their own dime.

I suggest you spend the afternoon doing google searches that show what it is you are defending here.

There are dozens of examples just like those just this year alone.



Of course, it's not just that, Republican lawmakers have gone so far as to ask trans women in hearings if they have a penis. https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out...earing-asks-transgender-woman-penis-rcna70787

Trans people have made their whole ****ing identity about their genitals.

You all can't cry because parents don't want trans people talking about their genitals with children and then run to the feinting couch when an adult asks them about their genitals. :rolleyes:
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out...earing-asks-transgender-woman-penis-rcna70787
Again, this is what happens when a political party embraces as a culture of cruelty.

It's a party embracing a culture of honesty. The trans movement is about forcing everyone else to join in their culture of delusion. You can think whatever you want to think about yourself, but I don't have to abide by it.

You are pushing to fast track permanent disfigurement of children and adults to honor a passing lunatic fad.

Let me help you out here, because I know for some of y'all, going against anything on right is just heresy to you, but you can say: "While I do not believe that children should get gender affirming surgeries or puberty blockers, I think that some of what the GOP is engaging in, particularly at the state level, when they target adults, is reprehensible and won't be judged well by history."

History will judge the trans movement by what you did to children, the adult transgenders will also suffer for the degenerate atrocities your supported for children... but then many of them SHOUDL suffer because they used children as a way to normalize their own mental illness.

I know a few trans people online who think the shit your are supporting is an abomination. They will come out the other side of this collective insanity just fine.

But then they were also the saner transgender people who never strayed from their position that transGENDER is a psychological condition, not a physical condition. They checked out of the trans movement the minute it coopted transexuals and treated them as interchangeable.

You know it's bullshit, you even accept that there is a problem when transGENDER actually encroaches on access for actual females to programs meant for females, but still you seem to have no problem with the carnage it is producing elsewhere.

Like I said, this isn't going to end the way you want it to because this movement is fundamentally unlike any movement you try to equate it to.

You see, one can actually decide things for themselves.

In the same way we should be handing out cyanide to people who are depressed....
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS

Looks like this issue will be studied in all business marketing courses for decades to come on what not to do with a top selling beer.

Marketing 101 tells us that products that use celebrity endorsements have one goal: to make customers relate to the celebrity who's touting the brand. Like those who buy Nike Air Jordans want to be like Mike. Or those that buy Rolex watches want to be like James Bond.

Bud Light has been a top selling beer for decades, because its cheap, and has a working class aura. Therefore the proper way to market it would be to appeal to the average working class. How does one do that? Conduct market research and ask people why theyre buying less of it and go from there.

So it takes a special kind of idiot to choose a trans activist, thinking they could take their existing customer base for granted, and force them to swallow whatever radical cause they preached.

Get woke, go broke!
So now the right is bragging about their cancel culture? Why am I not surprised?
 
Yeah they - and we - learned the degree to which violent ideation and has entered the mainstream of MAGA-Land consciousness. Learned more about how warped and paranoid some people have become as a result of drinking from a firehose of misinformation.

Something for MAGAts to hoot, holler, and high five each other about for sure.
LOL typical woke mindset. When you fail, blame everyone else, like the customers because of something you ****ed up. :ROFLMAO:

What is controversial about Dylan Mulvaney?
Since you dont know then thanks for proving my point.

So now the right is bragging about their cancel culture? Why am I not surprised?
Fight fire with fire lol. If you cant take the heat, get out of the kitchen. :LOL:
 
"An entire group" of how many? :rolleyes:

We don't support men pretending to be women. Get over it. It's men in women face. It's like defending white people who come out as black and wear blackface for Black History month.

As I said, you don't seem to understand the appalling "care" that you are supporting here.
See, it comes out. It's just plain old bigotry, you just owned up to it.
 
LOL typical woke mindset. When you fail, blame everyone else, like the customers because of something you ****ed up. :ROFLMAO:

What did I fail at? I'm not employed by AB/InBev. I'm not aware of any stock of theirs that I own, either.

I'm just making an observation about the unhinged backlash. The far right's boycott of Bud Light more closely resembles Judenboykott or Kristallnacht than Birmingham or Selma.
 
See, it comes out. It's just plain old bigotry, you just owned up to it.

LOL! Owned up to what? Was it a secret that thought transgenderism was bullshit? Sorry if I wasn't clear: Transgenderism is bullshit.

I also don't give a shit about transgenderism that stays in its original lane back when it argued that gender is a social construct and transgenders just feel like the opposite sex. I don't care what you think about yourself, just don't expect me to follow it.

Where transgenderism went off the rails was when idiots started to make it interchangeable with transsexualisms, and then decided that not only is transgenderism a feeling, but biological males and females are changed into the other physical sex just by the power of feeling. It's absolute bullshit.

Then the transgender movement decided it wasn't ****ing crazy enough so not biological men for use bathrooms and changing rooms with biological women and how dare you call their magical outy-vagina a penis! And scream at poor store clerks who misgender them when the clerk failed to notice that the former man in front of them was totally a magically transformed woman now... didn't he see the eyeshadow??!

And then it went a step further and decided that these magically transformed "women" should now join and dominate women's sports....

And then the transgender movement decided that wasn't ****ing crazy enough and now magically transformed new women should start winning women of the year award.

Apparently all the best women now are former men...

And even at this point there wasn't much of an uproar, just quietly shaking our heads at the collective insanity

Then these feckless pieces of shit decided to start teaching this insanity to our children.

Worse, public school systems started pushing the idea that they have more of a right to determine what your kids should be taught than you do.

And while every sane person in the country was finally getting wise to the degeneracy of that was now the trans movement, Budweiser thought it was the perfect atmosphere to make one of the most detestable faces of the transgender movement, a sick **** that likes to dress and behave like an 8 year old girl, a spokesperson for Budweiser.

And here we are, Bud Light... the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.

It all unravels from here, and once the transgender music stops everyone with their original genitalia will grab all the chairs and a bunch of mentally ill people with horrific scars and wrecked sex drive will be left standing.
 
LOL typical woke mindset. When you fail, blame everyone else, like the customers because of something you ****ed up. :ROFLMAO:

20 years from now the Democrats will be claiming that Republicans were the ones pushing transgenderism.
 
Back
Top Bottom