• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brownells Announces Mag Dump for Washington State

RF667799 said:
He's trying to make an argument he tried before, but got no traction with. The argument partially goes that this is the "Gun Control Forum", so anything sympathetic to anything other than strict gun control is off-topic.
Click to expand...

Actually, what he's doing is being an even bigger troll than usual.
 
Tlrmln said:
Actually, what he's doing is being an even bigger troll than usual.
Click to expand...
Ever since he hasn’t been able to get the last word in on every thread and see his name all the way down, he has been in rare form. Just when you didn’t think he could possibly spam the thread any more he limbos his way past his previous low.
 
Rich2018 said:
So that doesn't enhance gun ownership does it ?
If anything, it REDUCES gun control

You really need to work on your comprehension skills.
Click to expand...
Reducing onerous gun control is an enhancement.
 
Rich2018 said:
I said:
"Reducing gun control, onerous or otherwise, is a reduction in gun control..."

Thank you for agreeing with me.
Click to expand...
Weird how you chop off your OWN QUOTE to try and make a point. Badly, I might add.
 
Reducing is a reduction. There's a hell of a point. 😆
 
Moon said:
Weird how you chop off your OWN QUOTE to try and make a point. Badly, I might add.
Click to expand...

Or weird that you can't read properly.



You said:
Of course it is.
Click to expand...

I said:
"Reducing gun control, onerous or otherwise, is a reduction in gun control..."

Thank you for agreeing with me. Is it easier to comprehend now ?
 
Rich2018 said:
Or weird that you can't read properly.



You said:


I said:
"Reducing gun control, onerous or otherwise, is a reduction in gun control..."

Thank you for agreeing with me. Is it easier to comprehend now ?
Click to expand...
Could you come up with a more dishonest argument?
 
Rich2018 said:
Or weird that you can't read properly.



You said:


I said:
"Reducing gun control, onerous or otherwise, is a reduction in gun control..."

Thank you for agreeing with me. Is it easier to comprehend now ?
Click to expand...
Nope, you still lack the ability to quote yourself accurately, which is truly odd.
 
Moon said:
Nope, you still lack the ability to quote yourself accurately, which is truly odd.
Click to expand...

No, you continue to deny what you said. A typical deflection tactic is not odd or uncommon at all.
 
Rich2018 said:
No, you continue to deny what you said. A typical deflection tactic is not odd or uncommon at all.
Click to expand...

How are you proving that denial by misquoting yourself?
 
Rich2018 said:
No, you continue to deny what you said. A typical deflection tactic is not odd or uncommon at all.
Click to expand...
Deflection is your go to move. It’s almost like you completely lack the ability to discuss anything honestly.
 
Moon said:
Deflection is your go to move. It’s almost like you completely lack the ability to discuss anything honestly.
Click to expand...

No, but it is your as you've so aptly demonstrated, as it parroting, which you have likewise displayed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom