Not really an answer to the question...was it?
Its easy to twist the manufacturers arms
But consumers have to be forced to buy them or they will just sit on the dealers lots
Awesome. And where will the electricity come from?
For the right price/performance delta, consumers will buy them...
Not really an answer to the question...was it?
Particulary if some future liberal gives them a subsidy and crushes all the gas powered cars so that there is nothing else to buy
But that is hardly a triumph of the free market in a free society
Just curious: Do people ever get denied... their doctor overruled, essentially... for a procedure or medication? If so, what are some of the common reasons given?
I honestly don't know the answer, hence my asking.
See my post #230 to Vance .
Technology and progress are great when managed by the private sector and a free market
I take advantage of new stuff all the time
But decisions that should be made in the field by engineer and consumers are being made by environmentalist ideologs in washington and that is unacceptable
Take a look sometime at the public/private ventures in Utah. They're the leaders in the USA, especially on infrastructure .
If certain medications are not part of the "approved drugs list" by the province the request could be denied if the doctor made it. Typically associated with drugs that are very expensive, ie over $100 000 for a course of treatments, with little in the way of long term history. Also where probable other less effective drugs exist. This is generally in the case of very very rare diseases (like 1 in a million people type of thing). Other rejected treatments include the one that was popular for MS I believe a few years ago when they expanded the arteries to the brain.
Canada due to its population size probably will not have the same range of treatments for rare diseases like the US. So some treatments might be done in just a few hospitals in the US. The recommendation transport the patient to the US for treatment, can be and often is denied
Sure
The Hoover Dam, the TVA, the NRA were all government projects that were very successful.
But don't take that to mean that government should tell us what kind of cars to drive or reward private citizens that conform to the evironmentalist agenda
Awesome. Truly. And ou wont find a greater proponent for viable clean energy than me. Especially in emreging tecxhnologies.Isn't it exciting to think about the engineering that will be involved to make 'electric and solar charged stations.' You're military man. The ironic thing about all wars, and NASA of course, are the positive offshoots to the economy afterwards.
Look at the Born-Haber process to make ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen in WWI to get to nitroglycerin. We now use that process to gain anhydrous ammonia to fertilize farm fields .
And they get charged by fossil fuel plants.We solved that question, seems reasonable that we will solve your question as well. Since the situation has not dictated commercial charging stations yet, I cannot give you a definitive answer. The electric vehicles sold today seem to get charged. That better?
Good info. Thank you.
Awesome. Truly. And ou wont find a greater proponent for viable clean energy than me. Especially in emreging tecxhnologies.
But...
What happens when you impose a ban and 20 years from no solar is still not providing viable energy for large scale production, nuclear power is at a standstill and risking being capped, hydrogen generation has fizzled, and the only means you have of providing electricity to those plants is fossil fuels?
Teddy Roosevelt always asked one question, 'What will it be like in one hundred years?' The ultra conservationist TR, the progress---ive GOP who saved our National Parks from the Gilded wing of the GOP, would approve of cars flying around in 2040.
Wife and I will be visiting TR next week in the Black Hills and Mount Rushmore. Can't wait to hear all the snickers about trump being on the Great Faces .
Technology and progress are great when managed by the private sector and a free market
I take advantage of new stuff all the time
But decisions that should be made in the field by engineer and consumers are being made by environmentalist ideologs in washington and that is unacceptable
And they get charged by fossil fuel plants.
I'm kool with flying cars
Which liberals have been expecting since the first episode of the Jetsons in the 1960's
So why is it acceptable for the government to grant pipeline companies the power of imminent domain, so they can transport fuel from Canada to Texas? Why not let the "free market" determine what the pipeline companies need to pay for access to that land?
And can't say "free market" and not account for externalities, like pollution, or the cost of wars we've fought to retain access to cheap oil in the ME. Energy policy in this country hasn't ever been governed by a "free market." For various reasons, many of them very good ones, the government has placed a heavy hand on the market to ensure that we have plentiful and cheap fossil fuels, for industry, growth, etc. Nuclear owes its existence to $billions in R&D handed over for free to energy producers, not to mention the ongoing subsidies that make nuclear energy viable.
Point is, you can whine about renewables all you want, but please don't insult our intelligence by pretending that fossil fuels never have or don't still enjoy massive government subsidies. The only question is how big those subsidies were and are.
How do you suppose they will charge those vehicles?
They're going to happen after we harness plasma in electromagnetic fields, which is 10 to 15 years away at ITER and W X-7 .
Without immenint domain almost no big project could get done
If we think about it I bet there are examples of imminent domain that you approve of and some that I don't approve of
That that is much more limited government in our lives that greenies in a star chamber deciding the future of everyone 50 years from now
Only 10 to 15 years?
Where have I heard that one before?
But who knows?
Libs can't be wrong all the time
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?