• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Brexit and Trump Parallels

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,768
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
The Howl Against Democracy


The parallel with the #NeverTrump people is striking.

Well, if it's fair to ignore the majority if the brilliant minds of the elite think it best then it's certainly also fair to ignore the rights of the minority if, in our own wisdom, we deem the minority to be an arrogant self important double dealing bunch of self serving toffs. So it's rather surprising to find the elite so quick to trash the traditions of orderly democracy since that's the only thing saving them from crowds of irate citizens with pitchforks.
 

apparently you are unfamiliar with the concept of the tyranny of the majority

some suggested reading: Federalist Papers No. 51 - Bill of Rights Institute
 
Apparently you have a problem with reading comprehensively. Go tell your grandmother to read the Federalist Papers. :2razz:

My grandma is not a Trumpette who cant seem to grasp the idea of why a republican form of government is better than a full democratic one, you on the other hand....
 

52% voted for Brexit with 75% turnout. That's not exactly a groundswell of democracy. :roll:
 
52% voted for Brexit with 75% turnout. That's not exactly a groundswell of democracy. :roll:

Perhaps.

But it is a majority of the 3/4 majority of citizens who voted. You can't drag people into an election and you can't assume that a non-vote was a vote for the side you agree with.
 
Goal posts move when your side loses.

That usually happens. But, when you think about it, challenging it makes sense. 52% is not exactly a resounding voice.

I read yesterday where the pro EU people plan to overturn the referendum. Should be interesting.
 
Perhaps.

But it is a majority of the 3/4 majority of citizens who voted. You can't drag people into an election and you can't assume that a non-vote was a vote for the side you agree with.

Sure. But, it does give fuel to the fire. Kind of like when W barely won Florida and lost the popular vote outright. Most people who voted against him still think SCOTUS stole that election.
 
That usually happens. But, when you think about it, challenging it makes sense. 52% is not exactly a resounding voice.

I read yesterday where the pro EU people plan to overturn the referendum. Should be interesting.

You're right, the simple majority of the past that has been the standard just isn't good enough this time, let's keep having votes until we get that 50.0000001% to stay, that will be the real will of the people!
 
You're right, the simple majority of the past that has been the standard just isn't good enough this time, let's keep having votes until we get that 50.0000001% to stay, that will be the real will of the people!

I say let them live with it a few years and learn regret. That's how I do things...learn the hard way. I think it's healthy.
 
I say let them live with it a few years and learn regret. That's how I do things...learn the hard way. I think it's healthy.

Regret? They regret being sucked into the liberal globalization nightmare that why they opted out.
 
Regret? They regret being sucked into the liberal globalization nightmare that why they opted out.

Well, when London suddenly--as in right away--stops being the EU's financial center, we'll see how all that works out.

I always get a kick out of Righties failure to recognize the bigger picture. It's a blind spot made worse once the political rhetoric gets going.
 

I'm sure they will kick themselves for no longer having to send the European dependents $500B a year and losing their sovereignty to liberal socialists. :roll:
 

I find the above curious... While I certainly see the case for downside pressure in the markets due to uncertainty of the future, I think if you truly look at the long term picture... leaving was in the interest of the UK. The EU (like the Euro) is going to fail, in my opinion. The UK will not be the only one departing the EU. The loss of UK funding is going to hamper the ability of the EU. While the pound has been pounded the past couple of days, in the end it should return to being the second most powerful currency behind the dollar.

Obviously only time will tell. I could be wrong. But the UK is now free of Brussels idiocy. That is a big win.
 
I'm sure they will kick themselves for no longer having to send the European dependents $500B a year and losing their sovereignty to liberal socialists. :roll:

Yeah, yeah, we all know the bright shiny objects that were swung in front of everyone's eyes. But, how many who voted to leave the EU expected this?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...cline-is-the-biggest-impact-of-brexit-so-far/

 

I look to Africa...with all it's complicated border crossings and restrictions between countries, all rife with graft and long delays. If the EU Balkanizes, it will destroy the high standard of living they enjoy today.

While I too agree that allowing Brussels---one mightily screwed up city---to govern and impose rules on the people in the UK was a bad idea. I believe just bailing out on the economic union is even worse.
 
AGAIN we are seeing that The UK VOTE to drop out of the euro union is a winner for UK and the ones staying LOSERS...

friday stock market had UK losing 3.15%... france 6.2%.. germany 6.8%

today monday has it Uk losing 2.5%.... france 3.4% and germany 3.5%

what we see is the money is betting on that the immigration issue harms and UK stopping the immigration issue is harmed less and germany bringing the immigration issue the most harmed the most
 

Looking at a bunch of third world countries in Africa and trying to compare that to Europe is a bit of a stretch. The economic union is not in the interest of the citizens of the UK if they are not getting a return on their investment. Subsidizing other EU nations is not going to make Britain stronger. The labor issue is one that can be resolved without the need to be part of the bureaucratic nightmare that is the EU.
 

Hving your goods and people cross borders seemlessly should not be overlooked. If the US was 57 countries instead of states, we'd be a mess...and, yes, many of those states would resemble Africa.
 
Hving your goods and people cross borders seemlessly should not be overlooked. If the US was 57 countries instead of states, we'd be a mess...and, yes, many of those states would resemble Africa.

If it was only open boarders and a single currency it wouldn't be so bad, but being in the union comes with being subjected a Nanny State Globalist Liberal Utopia. The British are just the first to leave. Other people's money is great unless you are the other people. I think its funny watching the liberals standing around with their mouth's agape; they cant fathom the idea that the British can survive without a skirt to hide under.
 

We'll see. I predict a ten year recession in the UK. It's not like they are a powerhouse anymore. Hell, they may have had more to gain by staying than meets the eye.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…