Anywhere else pick it up, like the AP?
Notice the lack of mention of an orbital blowout in the story...
If gateway pundit did all the investigative work, wouldn't the MSM be right to credit them?
Now you are just being nitpicky. "Serious Facial Injury" is enough in itself for the Officer to have significant fear of death or serious bodily harm.
It is clear you won't accept this until Al Sharpton himself acknowledges it.
What is wrong? Afraid this isn't fitting in with the story you want to imagine?
Why are you so afraid of facts?
You might choose to interpret the media's rush to "be first, and damn the accuracy" as some kind of conspiracy against you, but I don't.
Ask yourself that question....
What is the significant difference between "Orbital Blowout Fracture", which you refuse to accept, and "Serious Facial Injury" which you have.
Quit being nitpicky.
Now you are just being nitpicky. "Serious Facial Injury" is enough in itself for the Officer to have significant fear of death or serious bodily harm.
It is clear you won't accept this until Al Sharpton himself acknowledges it.
What is wrong? Afraid this isn't fitting in with the story you want to imagine?
The Gateway Pundit is not reliable, which is why I asked for conformation. The lack of confirmation from other news sources makes it a pretty legit question as to whether the report is true or not. Note I am not saying it isn't true, but unlike most of you, I don't care which side is right, only that the truth is gotten to, and I am not trying to push any agenda.
Not to mention that adrenaline makes a big difference after alot of injuries and keeps people going. And swelling and restriction comes later for many injuries.
Myself and friends have many times had to ride out after broken bones and other injuries on the trail to get to medical help. You hope the adrenaline doesnt wear off before shock sets in.
Especially if you're trying to confirm liberal lies.:lamo
One is from a reputable source and one is not.
Why are you guys so determined to rush to judgement. I state I prefer to wait for reliable sources, and you all are "OMG, some one is asking questions...Al Sharpton, Al Sharpton". What exactly is wrong with wanting clear, confirmed information to base a judgement on and why does wanting that strike such fear in you?
You may have noticed that a lot of people are heavily......HEAVILY.....emotionally invested in one version of this story. When someone is that heavily invested, when the faith they have in the very foundation of their convictions, they tend to reject the idea that there may be other possibilities.
We'll see what happens when all the evidence comes out but I suspect that even if that evidence overwhelmingly indicates that Wilson was justified in using deadly force against Brown there will still be no acceptance of that evidence by a whole lot of people. To accept such evidence would mean that all the outrage and the protesting and the looting was based on a failed interpretation of their faith and that simply isn't something that a lot of people will be able to internalize.
Which lies am I trying to confirm? Name a couple. I will wait with baited breath for this...
The fact that Officer Wilson shot the 6'4" 300 pound thug without provocation. That's what this thread is ALL ABOUT.
The fact that Officer Wilson shot the 6'4" 300 pound thug without provocation. That's what this thread is ALL ABOUT.
I am not trying to suggest that it is only one group, but I do think condemning any one who rushes to judgement on this crap is worthwhile. It is stupid.
Justice has already been done you say.
This means the dead teenager with six bullets is justice to you.
Most Democrats don't believe Bundy and his gangbangers should have been shot down--what say you ?
It doesn't.One is from a reputable source and one is not.
Why are you guys so determined to rush to judgement. I state I prefer to wait for reliable sources, and you all are "OMG, some one is asking questions...Al Sharpton, Al Sharpton". What exactly is wrong with wanting clear, confirmed information to base a judgement on and why does wanting that strike such fear in you?
`How big of a black eye did they get for editing the call footage in the Trayvon case?
It doesn't.
Yours and others hardheadedness about the information because you want it from specific sources that align with your political ideology is what bothers me.
But, in the grand scheme of things, What is the difference between specifically naming a type of fracture, and claiming "Serious" facial injury??
So now there is no thread of evidence?
Quite the fantasy land you live in.
Try understanding politics before you respond to me again or just pass on by .
The fact that Officer Wilson shot the 6'4" 300 pound thug without provocation. That's what this thread is ALL ABOUT.
No, actually this thread is about a claim that Wilson has an orbital blowout fracture of his eye socket. You can tell by reading the thread title.
Also note that I have never claimed what you think I have, and that is only one claim. So I will ask again, what lies am I trying to confirm? You made the claim, I am sure you can back it up. You would never lie about some one....
I just had a thought... wouldn't it be nice if our 'African American' citizens could suddenly become 'American African' citizens? They're so proud of their heritage there surely could be a way to make this happen.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?