• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Boy Scouts history on gay scout leaders

joko104

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
65,981
Reaction score
23,408
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Under pressure by the PC police and increasing corporate bans, in 2015 the Boy Scouts of America changed its policy to allow gay scout masters.

5 years later (this year), the 110 year old Boy Scouts of America had to file bankruptcy due to all the lawsuits by former Boy Scouts claiming they were sexually assaulted by their scout masters.

It wasn't heterosexual scout masters that so often assaulted the boys it forced the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy.
 
Under pressure by the PC police and increasing corporate bans, in 2015 the Boy Scouts of America changed its policy to allow gay scout masters.

5 years later (this year), the 110 year old Boy Scouts of America had to file bankruptcy due to all the lawsuits by former Boy Scouts claiming they were sexually assaulted by their scout masters.

It wasn't heterosexual scout masters that so often assaulted the boys it forced the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy.

Another joko thread from alternate reality... Why don't you tell us whether vast majority of those sexual assaults happened before or after 2015.
 
Never a good idea to mix children and strangers.

You see this in the Catholic Church, boy scouts, etc.
 
Under pressure by the PC police and increasing corporate bans, in 2015 the Boy Scouts of America changed its policy to allow gay scout masters.

5 years later (this year), the 110 year old Boy Scouts of America had to file bankruptcy due to all the lawsuits by former Boy Scouts claiming they were sexually assaulted by their scout masters.

It wasn't heterosexual scout masters that so often assaulted the boys it forced the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy.

So where is the proof saying only the gay scout masters were to blame? Seems to me there were cases of molestation in boy scouts long before gay men were accepted.

Also, the boy scouts are bankrupt because nobody wants to join anymore. Boys play video games now, they aren't interested in learning how to tie their shoes in the most complex way possible. You can blame society for not forcing boys to stay interested, but the scouts haven't done anything to appeal to younger audiences, nor have they done a good job preventing sexual assault cases throughout their history.

Like you said, they had a 110 year run. Who cares if a century old nature club famous for diddling children bites the dust?
 
So where is the proof saying only the gay scout masters were to blame? Seems to me there were cases of molestation in boy scouts long before gay men were accepted.

Also, the boy scouts are bankrupt because nobody wants to join anymore. Boys play video games now, they aren't interested in learning how to tie their shoes in the most complex way possible. You can blame society for not forcing boys to stay interested, but the scouts haven't done anything to appeal to younger audiences, nor have they done a good job preventing sexual assault cases throughout their history.

Like you said, they had a 110 year run. Who cares if a century old nature club famous for diddling children bites the dust?

False and false. Heterosexuals men did not sexually abuse boys. The reason for the bankruptcy is specifically due to lawsuits regarding sexual assault - not low membership.
 
Under pressure by the PC police and increasing corporate bans, in 2015 the Boy Scouts of America changed its policy to allow gay scout masters.

5 years later (this year), the 110 year old Boy Scouts of America had to file bankruptcy due to all the lawsuits by former Boy Scouts claiming they were sexually assaulted by their scout masters.

It wasn't heterosexual scout masters that so often assaulted the boys it forced the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy.

You ever read up on the founder of BSA?
 
False and false. Heterosexuals men did not sexually abuse boys. The reason for the bankruptcy is specifically due to lawsuits regarding sexual assault - not low membership.

Incorrect.

BSA has a membership problem, not a litigation problem. And it started when the mormon church took it over.
 
Under pressure by the PC police and increasing corporate bans, in 2015 the Boy Scouts of America changed its policy to allow gay scout masters.

5 years later (this year), the 110 year old Boy Scouts of America had to file bankruptcy due to all the lawsuits by former Boy Scouts claiming they were sexually assaulted by their scout masters.

It wasn't heterosexual scout masters that so often assaulted the boys it forced the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy.

Huh. Odd to see you desperately pretend to actually care about this.

Oh, wait. No it's not.
 
Under pressure by the PC police and increasing corporate bans, in 2015 the Boy Scouts of America changed its policy to allow gay scout masters.

5 years later (this year), the 110 year old Boy Scouts of America had to file bankruptcy due to all the lawsuits by former Boy Scouts claiming they were sexually assaulted by their scout masters.

It wasn't heterosexual scout masters that so often assaulted the boys it forced the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy.

Boy Scouts seek bankruptcy, urge victims to step forward - StarTribune.com

More than 12,000 boys have been molested by 7,800 abusers since the 1920s, according to Boy Scout files revealed in court papers.

It doesn't seem like this started in the last 5 years.
 
False and false. Heterosexuals men did not sexually abuse boys. The reason for the bankruptcy is specifically due to lawsuits regarding sexual assault - not low membership.

Your post lacks proof.
 
It doesn't mention how far back the abuse dates. Anyway, Baden Powell did have a homoerotic interest in boys.

Some guy writes a book claiming he psycho-analyzed a dead man claiming he repressed being a homosexual. What Powell actually said is that any man who has sex with a boy "should be flogged." (Violently beaten with a club or whipped).
 
Some guy writes a book claiming he psycho-analyzed a dead man claiming he repressed being a homosexual. What Powell actually said is that any man who has sex with a boy "should be flogged." (Violently beaten with a club or whipped).

Some random poster makes assertions and doesn't back them up.
 
Another joko thread from alternate reality... Why don't you tell us whether vast majority of those sexual assaults happened before or after 2015.

Why? The topic is was allowing homosexual scout masters a good idea? If secret gay scout masters had been sexually assaulting boys for decades that only serves to explain why the answer is no.
 
Why? The topic is was allowing homosexual scout masters a good idea? If secret gay scout masters had been sexually assaulting boys for decades that only serves to explain why the answer is no.

You do realize that you're arguing against yourself? If all those assaults were committed by "secret gay scout masters," then a policy change 5 years ago didn't make any difference.
 
Why? The topic is was allowing homosexual scout masters a good idea? If secret gay scout masters had been sexually assaulting boys for decades that only serves to explain why the answer is no.

First, your OP was clearly implying that 2015 decision was what led to the bankruptcy. That was clear misrepresentation of events.

Secondly, if the lawsuits you reference are the cause of bankruptcy, then clearly 2015 decision had nothing to do with it. They would have filed for bankruptcy either way (since lawsuits were unrelated to 2015 decision).

In other words ...

You do realize that you're arguing against yourself? If all those assaults were committed by "secret gay scout masters," then a policy change 5 years ago didn't make any difference.
 
First, your OP was clearly implying that 2015 decision was what led to the bankruptcy. That was clear misrepresentation of events.

Secondly, if the lawsuits you reference are the cause of bankruptcy, then clearly 2015 decision had nothing to do with it. They would have filed for bankruptcy either way (since lawsuits were unrelated to 2015 decision).

In other words ...

You haven't proven anything. Clearly having gay scout masters and staff was a terrible mistake and it destroyed the Boy Scouts.
 
Under pressure by the PC police and increasing corporate bans, in 2015 the Boy Scouts of America changed its policy to allow gay scout masters.

5 years later (this year), the 110 year old Boy Scouts of America had to file bankruptcy due to all the lawsuits by former Boy Scouts claiming they were sexually assaulted by their scout masters.

It wasn't heterosexual scout masters that so often assaulted the boys it forced the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy.

So those lawsuits were against out gay scout leaders? Link to those lawsuits please.
 
False and false. Heterosexuals men did not sexually abuse boys. The reason for the bankruptcy is specifically due to lawsuits regarding sexual assault - not low membership.

Sure they do......a large percentage are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, cousins, grandfathers, and family friends.
 
Incorrect.

BSA has a membership problem, not a litigation problem. And it started when the mormon church took it over.

No, it did not take it over. It dropped out when the Boy Scouts announced they would have gay scout masters. That cost 400,000 boy scouts. Combine that with hundreds of lawsuits over sexal abuse ended the Boy Scouts. It is simple fact that allowing gay scout masters and staff destroyed the Boy Scouts however you size it up.
 
Sure they do......a large percentage are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, cousins, grandfathers, and family friends.

Prove it and so what?
 
Back
Top Bottom