Bond denied for SC state lawmaker indicted on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse material

[What if...?]

Wow, you can't even bring yourself to condemn a person distributing kiddy porn just because he's on "your side".

But it’s not a cult!

 

[SCrider]

yeah, because never has a far left nutjob done anything like this

and that excuses him?

 

[SCrider]

Seems like many pedos in the news are white-skinned rightwing degenerates. Most also claim to be "Christians", surprise, surprise. Sick bastards, but they always try to blame trans people, etc. for such sicko behavior. They all have reasons for their lies.

the whole Q thing they fell for was like the anti-gay conservative caught in a gay bathhouse.....

 

[Bodecea]

Bond denied for SC state lawmaker indicted on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse material

South Carolina state lawmaker RJ May, who co-founded far-right House Freedom Caucus, was indicted on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse material.

www.postandcourier.com

COLUMBIA — Now-suspended state Rep. Robert John "RJ" May III will be held indefinitely inside the Lexington County jail after a federal magistrate denied him bond in the wake of a shocking filing of charges that centered on him allegedly sharing electronic files depicting child sexual abuse.

May, 38, was indicted by a federal grand jury this week on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse materials — the culmination of a more than yearlong probe in which authorities were tipped off by a national messaging app before moving in to seize his phone and computer.

What do you know an ultra right Trumper makes me sick

Good...no bail. Keep an eye on who else in the MAGAtsphere he is in con-tact with.

 

[Bodecea]

and that excuses him?

Of course it does...........................to MAGAts. Remember, they worship a rapey felon who bragged about sexual feelings towards his daughter when she was a child.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

Its hard to say but the judge said he’s a danger to the community and his family

Here are some more details

State Rep. RJ May arrested, booked at Lexington County jail

May has been representing Lexington County since 2021.

www.wltx.com

And he is.

Any dude who can get off on images of toddlers being forced into bestiality is likely a danger to his own children as well. When you get down that low where's the cutoff point on sick and degenerate, really?

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

the whole Q thing they fell for was like the anti-gay conservative caught in a gay bathhouse.....

bingo

 

[SCrider]

Are there still pending investigations going on? Like who/how old the women are/were? Who he distributed the stuff to?

Some of the allegations are sickening, but the story is all over the place, and lacking in detail.

Woman? The charges are about child porn.
The depths you will go to to defend your team are sickening.

 

[Cope]

"Toddlers" is pretty specific.

Are you saying that some of those toddlers were women?

ETA: As for the "women" reference, I found the article again w/o paywall. They are stating that some of the "women" in the videos unusually small anatomical structures. IOW: they can't confirm that those are minors yet (the toddlers are easy obv....ugh, God) but I have to think the incidence of grown women with unusually small anatomical structures in the population is pretty low. Those are likely minors who are either in early adolescence or not there yet. (shudder) But again, until confirmed, they legally can't say so.

However, they ARE straight-up saying toddlers. So those must be confirmed.


View attachment 67574507

They didn't say "minors" or "children" for the more ambiguous ones because if they say those are minors without confirming it, they could **** up their entire case. That is literally the only reason the word was used. I mean read the sentence.

And again. How is it somehow important to note that it's possible that in addition to toddlers...toddlers...this guy might also have been distributing adult porn? What is the significance here?

View attachment 67574508

Some of the videos showing toddlers and children involved bestiality.

Let this sink in if you have the stomach for it.

You continue to defend this guy who got off on pics of animals being forced on toddlers because hey...some of the older children might actually be adults with some condition or other that has prevented their normal adolescence?

Really?

Saw all that but they also talked about women he would text, or visit.

 

[Cope]

Woman? The charges are about child porn.
The depths you will go to to defend your team are sickening.

It's fixing to be a problem if you say that shit one more time.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

Woman? The charges are about child porn.
The depths you will go to to defend your team are sickening.

But you don't understand. This poor misunderstood guy didn't just enjoy pics of animals sexually abusing toddlers. He also liked pics of women with, apparently, physical or hormonal issues that caused them to look like children. But those might have been adults.

So it's really not so bad.

MAGA

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

Saw all that but they also talked about women he would text, or visit.

So again. What is the significance that he is also apparently able to have sex with women?

How does that soften or even figure into the fact that he apparently enjoyed pics of "women" with anatomical features that made them look like children, in addition to liking pics of literal toddlers engaging in acts with animals?

 

[Cope]

So again. What is the significance that he is also apparently able to have sex with women?

How does that soften or even figure into the fact that he apparently enjoyed pics of "women" with anatomical features that made them look like children, in addition to liking pics of literal toddlers engaging in acts with animals?

Are there still pending investigations going on? Like who/how old the women are/were? Who he distributed the stuff to?

Some of the allegations are sickening, but the story is all over the place, and lacking in detail.

I bolded the part you (and others) are attempting to wash out of the context.

Next step is to just start blocking the worst offenders.

 

[Cope]

So again. What is the significance that he is also apparently able to have sex with women?

I don't know, which was why I said the article was all over the place.

How does that soften or even figure into the fact that he apparently enjoyed pics of "women" with anatomical features that made them look like children, in addition to liking pics of literal toddlers engaging in acts with animals?

It wouldn't soften it. It would CLARIFY it.

 

[bythoughts]

For the record, I think he may be entirely innocent.

In this article it says that a picture was posted that contained his Wi-Fi password, and Wi-Fi was used to post the images.

State house politics is nasty - it's not like in the pro leagues where people know sneaky underhanded legal ways to get stuff done. It could be a primary opponent or a Democrat, or someone with a crooked deal planned with one of them.

In general, I find it highly peculiar and distressing that people accept that computers can do almost anything they want to and nobody will ever figure it out, yet the minute child porn comes up, the accused is supposed to have TOTAL AND COMPLETE CONTROL of their network and computer.

That level of control does not even exist in the Microsoft world. You don't even own your computer - you own a license to use it if you don't reverse engineer anything! If you can't access your printer or your mouse pad stops working, you'll be lucky if a tech geek can figure it out. But you're supposed to know if there is a hacker on your wi-fi or a secret partition on your hard drive or the incriminating traces of part of a deleted file that nobody can explain what its role was in the file system before that???

So no, I don't want to say one nasty thing about this guy unless I see some kind of corroboration that he was actually pedo IRL. Too many reporters and politicians have been getting taken out this way recently - more than I think seem believable. It's about time that people stop tearing each other apart over what is so easily faked or planted.

 

[Old 'N Chill]

the whole Q thing they fell for was like the anti-gay conservative caught in a gay bathhouse.....

Yep, the boogeyman under their beds, who they secretly wanted on top of the bed. That wacko pizzagate thing too. Gullible, frustrated, angry fools always looking for someone to blame or put down, makes them feel better.

 

[ClaraD]

For the record, I think he may be entirely innocent.

In this article it says that a picture was posted that contained his Wi-Fi password, and Wi-Fi was used to post the images.

State house politics is nasty - it's not like in the pro leagues where people know sneaky underhanded legal ways to get stuff done. It could be a primary opponent or a Democrat, or someone with a crooked deal planned with one of them.

In general, I find it highly peculiar and distressing that people accept that computers can do almost anything they want to and nobody will ever figure it out, yet the minute child porn comes up, the accused is supposed to have TOTAL AND COMPLETE CONTROL of their network and computer.

That level of control does not even exist in the Microsoft world. You don't even own your computer - you own a license to use it if you don't reverse engineer anything! If you can't access your printer or your mouse pad stops working, you'll be lucky if a tech geek can figure it out. But you're supposed to know if there is a hacker on your wi-fi or a secret partition on your hard drive or the incriminating traces of part of a deleted file that nobody can explain what its role was in the file system before that???

So no, I don't want to say one nasty thing about this guy unless I see some kind of corroboration that he was actually pedo IRL. Too many reporters and politicians have been getting taken out this way recently - more than I think seem believable. It's about time that people stop tearing each other apart over what is so easily faked or planted.

They tracked the communications and transfer of the images to his home IP address and to his cell phone

 

[LouC]

Bond denied for SC state lawmaker indicted on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse material.​

Good.

Bet though, when RJ was arrested he didn't get thrown to the ground and have some officer kneel on his neck for 8 minutes.

Too bad.

That might have obviated any need for denying Bond.

 

[Safiel]

For the record, I think he may be entirely innocent.

In this article it says that a picture was posted that contained his Wi-Fi password, and Wi-Fi was used to post the images.

State house politics is nasty - it's not like in the pro leagues where people know sneaky underhanded legal ways to get stuff done. It could be a primary opponent or a Democrat, or someone with a crooked deal planned with one of them.

In general, I find it highly peculiar and distressing that people accept that computers can do almost anything they want to and nobody will ever figure it out, yet the minute child porn comes up, the accused is supposed to have TOTAL AND COMPLETE CONTROL of their network and computer.

That level of control does not even exist in the Microsoft world. You don't even own your computer - you own a license to use it if you don't reverse engineer anything! If you can't access your printer or your mouse pad stops working, you'll be lucky if a tech geek can figure it out. But you're supposed to know if there is a hacker on your wi-fi or a secret partition on your hard drive or the incriminating traces of part of a deleted file that nobody can explain what its role was in the file system before that???

So no, I don't want to say one nasty thing about this guy unless I see some kind of corroboration that he was actually pedo IRL. Too many reporters and politicians have been getting taken out this way recently - more than I think seem believable. It's about time that people stop tearing each other apart over what is so easily faked or planted.

If this was JUST a story out of the blue in the press, I might accept that.

But the man has been charged Federally, meaning there has been an extensive investigation and the investigators have already looked into the issues you raise.

The man has been charged Federally, there has been an investigation, clearly they have established a sufficient case both on which to charge him with a Federal crime and to hold him without bail.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

I bolded the part you (and others) are attempting to wash out of the context.

Next step is to just start blocking the worst offenders.

Ah.

So it’s the allegations that are sickening.

Not this guy.

 

[Old 'N Chill]

Of course it does...........................to MAGAts. Remember, they worship a rapey felon who bragged about sexual feelings towards his daughter when she was a child.

Inches away from playing grab ass with her when the camera was shooting, I don't think it became more respectable when the photo taking was done....no. He wanted to 'date' her and he spoke sexually of body parts of his baby daughter too. Sick bastard, leading American into Fascism. Sad.

 

[Cope]

Ah.

So it’s the allegations that are sickening.

Not this guy.

Do you always rush to judgement based upon what someone else told you? You attempt to never discern the truth for yourself?

I mean, I could tell from long ago but at least you are upfront and honest about it. Yes, the allegations are sickening. If those allegations, then he sickens me. Geez Louise you and your little semantic word games.

That's a significant problem in today's world.