• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bond denied for SC state lawmaker indicted on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse material

Cope said:
Oh I did. Keep reading and you will find the women that I referred to.

You aren't so good at reading comprehension, or at reading others, are ya?
Click to expand...
He’s not in trouble legally for the images of women stop justifying this its just gross
 
Safiel said:
My nephew lives in that district. Evidently the guy won without opposition in the last election. My nephew was actually registered with the Green Party when he lived in Florida, pretty much the dead opposite of Maga.

😄
Click to expand...
My mother also lives in his district and she didn’t vote for him. I hope they are investigating to see if he abused his kids and it says clearly that some of his encounters in Colombia were with ‘women’ who did not appear to be anatomically over the age of 18. Sex trafficking of girls is common in Colombia.
 
ClaraD said:
Women? These were children, really small ones…child porn and all that so bad he was denied bond
Click to expand...
That was the terminology used in the article, likely because they did not have the ages of the women/girls.
 
ClaraD said:
He’s not in trouble legally for the images of women stop justifying this its just gross
Click to expand...
And another in a long line if attempting to read motivations. You people (all of you) really suck at it. Perhaps stop doing it?

What I did say was that the article was lacking in detail (and facts)
 
ClaraD said:
www.postandcourier.com

Bond denied for SC state lawmaker indicted on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse material

South Carolina state lawmaker RJ May, who co-founded far-right House Freedom Caucus, was indicted on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse material.
www.postandcourier.com www.postandcourier.com

COLUMBIA — Now-suspended state Rep. Robert John "RJ" May III will be held indefinitely inside the Lexington County jail after a federal magistrate denied him bond in the wake of a shocking filing of charges that centered on him allegedly sharing electronic files depicting child sexual abuse.

May, 38, was indicted by a federal grand jury this week on 10 counts of distributing child sexual abuse materials — the culmination of a more than yearlong probe in which authorities were tipped off by a national messaging app before moving in to seize his phone and computer.

What do you know an ultra right Trumper makes me sick
Click to expand...
A founder of the Freedom Caucus, you say?
 
Cope said:
Are there still pending investigations going on? Like who/how old the women are/were? Who he distributed the stuff to?

Some of the allegations are sickening, but the story is all over the place, and lacking in detail.
Click to expand...
Ew.
 
Cope said:
That was the terminology used in the article, likely because they did not have the ages of the women/girls.
Click to expand...
It wasn’t just women and girls it was kiddie porn and talking about how to molest your own kids. This is sick and its disgusting that anyone is making excuses for this man
 
ClaraD said:
It wasn’t just women and girls it was kiddie porn and talking about how to molest your own kids. This is sick and its disgusting that anyone is making excuses for this man
Click to expand...
Jesus.
 
The U.S. Attorney's Office District of South Carolina said at least 10 videos depicting child sexual abuse were shared from the account.


To make it clearer for those calling children women and trying to victim blame
 
Hamish Howl said:
Makes you want to puke, doesn't it?
Click to expand...
I imagined there would be some lines we could all agree on collectively.

I guess I should be thankful for the shattering of my illusions?

As disgusting as it feels, I am also greatly disappointed...
 
ClaraD said:
My mother also lives in his district and she didn’t vote for him. I hope they are investigating to see if he abused his kids and it says clearly that some of his encounters in Colombia were with ‘women’ who did not appear to be anatomically over the age of 18. Sex trafficking of girls is common in Colombia.
Click to expand...

My nephew works for the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division in forensics work. This particular investigation was done by the Federal Government, so he may or may not have assisted at the State level. But I have talked to him a number of times about his work and you are correct, trafficking is a major issue.
 
Old 'N Chill said:
Seems like many pedos in the news are white-skinned rightwing degenerates. Most also claim to be "Christians", surprise, surprise. Sick bastards, but they always try to blame trans people, etc. for such sicko behavior. They all have reasons for their lies.
Click to expand...

This does make sense from a psychology perspective. "There's somebody worse than I am, so what I'm thinking/doing isn't so bad." That's also why such people need to continue to demonize their target group. Because if that group isn't so bad either, then...where does that leave the molestor? Back to the self-loathing they push down but which is pretty appropriate, given what they're doing.
 
Safiel said:
My nephew works for the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division in forensics work. This particular investigation was done by the Federal Government, so he may or may not have assisted at the State level. But I have talked to him a number of times about his work and you are correct, trafficking is a major issue.
Click to expand...
Its hard to say but the judge said he’s a danger to the community and his family

Here are some more details

www.wltx.com

State Rep. RJ May arrested, booked at Lexington County jail

May has been representing Lexington County since 2021.
www.wltx.com www.wltx.com
 
Cope said:
That was the terminology used in the article, likely because they did not have the ages of the women/girls.
Click to expand...

"Toddlers" is pretty specific.

Are you saying that some of those toddlers were women?

ETA: As for the "women" reference, I found the article again w/o paywall. They are stating that some of the "women" in the videos unusually small anatomical structures. IOW: they can't confirm that those are minors yet (the toddlers are easy obv....ugh, God) but I have to think the incidence of grown women with unusually small anatomical structures in the population is pretty low. Those are likely minors who are either in early adolescence or not there yet. (shudder) But again, until confirmed, they legally can't say so.

However, they ARE straight-up saying toddlers. So those must be confirmed.


1749839727702.webp

They didn't say "minors" or "children" for the more ambiguous ones because if they say those are minors without confirming it, they could **** up their entire case. That is literally the only reason the word was used. I mean read the sentence.

And again. How is it somehow important to note that it's possible that in addition to toddlers...toddlers...this guy might also have been distributing adult porn? What is the significance here?

1749839792848.webp

Some of the videos showing toddlers and children involved bestiality.

Let this sink in if you have the stomach for it.

You continue to defend this guy who got off on pics of animals being forced on toddlers because hey...some of the older children might actually be adults with some condition or other that has prevented their normal adolescence?

Really?
 
Last edited:
EnchantedMuggle said:
"Toddlers" is pretty specific.

Are you saying that some of those toddlers were women?

As for the "women" reference, I found the article again w/o paywall. They are stating that some of the "women" had unusually small genitalia. IOW: they can't confirm that those are minors yet (the toddlers are easy obv....ugh, God) but I have to think the incidence of grown women with unusually small genetalia in the population is pretty low.

They didn't say "minors" or "children" for the more ambiguous ones because if they say those are minors without confirming it, they could **** up their entire case. That is literally the only reason the word was used. I mean read the sentence.

And again. How is it somehow important to note that it's possible that in addition to toddlers...toddlers...this guy might also have been distributing adult porn? What is the significance here?
Click to expand...
The pictures he was indicted for is separate from his trip to Colombia. The photos that were exchanged via Kik are of toddlers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom