You didn't answer anything, you just posed questions.
Are you suggesting Reagan didn't increase the budget deficit?
Are you suggesting Bush 1 didn't increase the budget deficit?
Are you suggesting Bush 2 didn't increase the budget deficit?
I am not suggesting that at all because the facts show it.
Reagan added 1.7 trillion to the debt in 8 years-Divided Congress
Bush one added 1.4 trillion to the debt in 4 years-Democrat controlled Congress
Clinton added 1.3 trillion to the debt in 8 years, GOP Congress from 1995-2000
GW Bush added 4.9 trillion to the debt in 8 years-GOP Congress 2003-2007, Democrats controlled Congress 2007-2008
Obama has added 4 trillion to the debt in 3 years-Democrats with overwhelminng numbers 2009-2010
So what is your point? Your statement was on Reagan so tell me how 1.7 trillion added to the debt in 8 years is worse than 4 trillion added in three?
In addition, did any of these 3 elected officials believe in reducing regulations and cutting taxes to stimulate the economy? Are the Republicans of today requesting the same solution as the above 3 presidents?
Let's hope so, the only way to get out of debt is to cut spending and grow the economy. That is what Reagan did but you were probably too young to realize that.
I know the answer to all of the above is YES, but maybe you have a different prespective than the truth.
If you're upset with budget busting ideas, you cannot blame Democrat Presidents. The 2 within the time frame I described, only Carter and Clinton "ran" the government. Both reduced the budget deficit.
Which party do you trust?
If you know the answer then give them.
Like all liberals you just don't get it, by the way Reagan inherited a 900 billion debt from Carter. Which party do I trust, Democrat or Republican? Republican for all Democrats have done is promote class warfare and class envy. Why would you support a party that pits classes against each other instead of working towards the betterment of all?