• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

BLM shoots yet another

No thanks I dont stare at below the waist pictures of men. I'll defer to your expertise.

Not to worry. Five time draft dodgers really aren't very 'manly.' Take a gander next time, and see for yourself. Trump indeed wears diapers. Probably has all of his pathetic life.
 
There are 14,000 homicides in the US yearly on average. Where are your 14,000 threads caalling them out?

I call it out all the time. Over half of the 14k homicides are black on black. Where is the jack ass party and BLM on the issue.
 
Taking a single criminal act and attributing it to any "movement" (BLM or otherwise) is BS. If a single (known) Trump supporter commits a crime is that then indicative of the Trump supporter "movement"?

Unfortunately it is not a single act. Don’t forget CHOP and the eight year old in Atlanta.
If you ask the looney left, yes they would feel it is indicative of Trump supporters.
 
No, it isn't. Somebody shouts: "Trump!" and immediately the other side defines that person as a Trump cult member.

The moment you shout: "Black lives matter!", you become part of the BLM "organization".

That's how it is.

you have to remember you are talking to the biggest hypocrites in history here.
their logic only goes in 1 direction.
 
Ultmd's FIRST RULE OF POLITICAL DEBATE: Never, never, never....EVER....believe ANYTHING you see, hear or read from the conservative FakeNews media, until that same story as been confirmed and reported by a LEGITIMATE news organization.

The reason this story hasn't been repeated as a "#BLM" shooting seem pretty clear to me. There is ZERO evidence that this had anything to do with #BLM, at all. We DO know that the victim and her friends are/were a bunch of bigots who were casually slurring African-Americans when they were confronted.

So why in the world would #BLM feel ANY need to say a word about this incident? Certainly, they shouldn't lose any sleep over what a bunch of white natty types think they ought to do. We don't know even know if the shooters were the same people who argued with the Ms. Doty and her ignorant, hateful friends.

Until this story is picked up by a legitimate news organization...you'd have to be an flaming idiot to believe it happened as described by that bigot's boyfriend.

I never like to see people die due to gun violence. But blaming #BLM here is not right.

It's very typical of the white natty crowd...but it's still not right.

Yea, the shooting was justified because they were racist.

VIDEO: Black Man Racially Harasses, Threatens Young Students On D.C. Trip For Wearing MAGA Hats - National File

Is the high school student justify in shooting the black guy?

No shooting over words is justified.
 
Will mass school shootings do anything to curb guns in america?


There is a problem when you can’t get democrat politicians in these cities to address the illegal gun issue.
 
Apparently they care more than your alt-left media ... :lol:

Ah yes...so not a word of condemnation when informed that your own "news" sources failed to report this "huge" story of a "racist BLM shooting"...for 7 freaking days!

Clearly, this is just another fakenews story from the fakenews media. And THAT is why no legitimate news organization has reported it.

You people are nothing, if not predictable.
 
Yea, the shooting was justified because they were racist.

Is this your opinion?

It's certainly not mine. So I can only presume that you are either expressing your own opinion...or you are intentionally misrepresenting my remarks...or you have difficulty comprehending the written word. Which is it?


:lamo
The "high school student" vs "the black guy", huh?

You meant "the white guy" (in contrast to "the black guy"), right?

For sake of comparison, let's refer to "the white guy" and "the black guy"....or the "high school student" and the "angry guy", shall we? If it's important (in your mind) to emphasize the race of the "black guy", you should do the same for the "high school student". And from the looks of that 40 second video, it appears that the primary target of the vitriol was a middle-aged white man, not a 'high school student".

That said, we both know that if the white guy had shot the black guy (which is, I assume, what you were implying), EVERY single conservative white guy in America (yourself included) would have immediately claimed "self defense" on behalf of the white guy; and the "black guy" would have been immediately labeled a "thug" (among other standard white natty epithets). History proves that.

The only time violence is bad (in the minds of white natty types) is when it originates from non-white people. When white people are violent, the excuses and rationalizations (and calls to "let the process play out" and "wait to see all the evidence", etc.) flow freely, like the waters from the River Jordan.


No shooting over words is justified.
I've already stated as much.

But for you, the question is....Even when the victims are not white, correct?

Funny, but I've never seen conservatives rush to this board to condemn the murders by police and white vigilantes of unarmed black men and women...often for LESS than "words". I wonder why?

The simple (and ugly, for your side) TRUTH is that practically ALL of the most serious incidents of violence, vandalism, arson, etc.....and LITERALLY EVERY shooting of police officers...during the recent #BLM national protests....have been incited by WHITE NATIONALIST groups who have organized themselves online and infiltrated the protests with the sole purpose of creating inciting violence and destruction that would be blamed on the Black Lives Matter movement. That FACT has been confirmed by TRUMP's own FBI.

So, if you people were honestly concerned about violence and vandalism and protecting the police, etc. etc....you would be on message board condemning WHITE NATIONALISM right now. But you aren't...because will not condemn your own people.
 
There is a problem when you can’t get democrat politicians in these cities to address the illegal gun issue.

Well that's one of the more moronic statements I've read today. How would you like for them to address it? Confiscate all firearms? I'm sure the right would love that.
 
Uh no, I think I clearly stated the opposite. The shooter is responsible for his crime. Not BLM the organization, and not the millions of loosely affiliated people protesting for police reform. To call it a "BLM killing" is a disgusting attempt to capitalize on a tragedy to slander political opponents

That defense did not work at Nuremberg... and I can't see how you would make it work here. But you seem keen...

So present your argument. I will rebut once you have.
 
:lamo
The "high school student" vs "the black guy", huh?

You meant "the white guy" (in contrast to "the black guy"), right?

For sake of comparison, let's refer to "the white guy" and "the black guy"....or the "high school student" and the "angry guy", shall we? If it's important (in your mind) to emphasize the race of the "black guy", you should do the same for the "high school student". And from the looks of that 40 second video, it appears that the primary target of the vitriol was a middle-aged white man, not a 'high school student".

You mean the 41 second video of the 20-something black man screaming threats at a few young white boys, the old white lady and the apparently really old white man? He sounds like a really special person on top of that... shouting about his dick and how he is not even American. Educated too... why would you even bother to argue anything about this point for any reason?
 
That defense did not work at Nuremberg... and I can't see how you would make it work here. But you seem keen...

So present your argument. I will rebut once you have.

Oh Nuremburg? You mean when we tried members of an extremely hierarchical fascist government and military organization? Where every atrocity was thoroughly planned out in advance and passed as orders through that hierarchy? Nazi leaders gave out orders for atrocities, and were convicted at Nuremberg even though they didn't commit those atrocities themselves. This comparison is absurd. If you want to make it, you need to address a few differences between the two situations.

1. Did BLM organizers give any orders to the shooter in this case? Obviously not. It was done in anger after a drunken argument in the middle of the night.
2. Were BLM organizers even aware of the shooter as an individual? Did they ever express any enmity towards the victim specifically? Probably not.
3. Was the shooter even an official member of BLM? Has not been proven.

But that's just the official organizers. When you call it a "BLM killing" you are slandering every protester that supports police reform, even when they don't have any official affiliation with the organization. So tell me, what does Joe, a peaceful protester in Minneapolis, have to do with this killing in Indianapolis? Did Joe encourage the shooter? Did Joe help him buy his gun?
 
Well that's one of the more moronic statements I've read today. How would you like for them to address it? Confiscate all firearms? I'm sure the right would love that.

The solution is to defund the police.
Obviously you have no comprehension skills. I talk about illegal guns and you talk about all firearms.
No, I don’t think legal gun owners would have a problem if illegal guns were confiscated.
 
Oh Nuremburg? You mean when we tried members of an extremely hierarchical fascist government and military organization? Where every atrocity was thoroughly planned out in advance and passed as orders through that hierarchy? Nazi leaders gave out orders for atrocities, and were convicted at Nuremberg even though they didn't commit those atrocities themselves. This comparison is absurd. If you want to make it, you need to address a few differences between the two situations.

So the difference is that the Nazi's were more organized? That is too easy of a cop-out.

1. Did BLM organizers give any orders to the shooter in this case? Obviously not. It was done in anger after a drunken argument in the middle of the night.

When a person is part of an organization like that then, especially when, a race related incident occurs it reflects that orginization.

2. Were BLM organizers even aware of the shooter as an individual? Did they ever express any enmity towards the victim specifically? Probably not.

Was Hitler or the Nazi party aware of the common German soldier that shot innocent Russian children... of course not.

3. Was the shooter even an official member of BLM? Has not been proven.

That is your qualification...

But that's just the official organizers. When you call it a "BLM killing" you are slandering every protester that supports police reform, even when they don't have any official affiliation with the organization. So tell me, what does Joe, a peaceful protester in Minneapolis, have to do with this killing in Indianapolis? Did Joe encourage the shooter? Did Joe help him buy his gun?

So when you call Floyd killed be a cop you are slandering every cop even when they had nothing to do with the crime.

Can't have it both ways...
 
Yea, the shooting was justified because they were racist.

………

No shooting over words is justified.

Wow! was it her words that "all lives matter" that convinced you she was a racist deserving death?
 
Wow! was it her words that "all lives matter" that convinced you she was a racist deserving death?

The story alleges someone in her group of friends was using racial slurs. That may be an allegation to make the criminal out as the victim.
 
You mean the 41 second video of the 20-something black man screaming threats at a few young white boys, the old white lady and the apparently really old white man? He sounds like a really special person on top of that... shouting about his dick and how he is not even American. Educated too... why would you even bother to argue anything about this point for any reason?

Your screed, above, is only slightly better than his. You're point seems rather silly, since none of it has anything to do with whether, or not, Black Lives Matter shot that innocent little girl.

That has NOTHING to do with the moronic (and clearly bigoted) claims that the woman in the OP (or the little girl in Atlanta...from similar thread) was shot by "#BLM".

My "argument" is that the moronic claim made in the OP...was a complete fabrication. And an ignorant, bigoted one, at that.

What you think of that young man in the 41second video...is totally irrelevant to the issue (and to me).
 
Last edited:
Your screed, above, is only slightly better than his. You're point seems rather silly, since none of it has anything to do with whether, or not, Black Lives Matter shot that innocent little girl.

That has NOTHING to do with the moronic (and clearly bigoted) claim that that little girl was shot by "#BLM".

My "argument" is that the moronic claim made in the OP...was a complete fabrication. And an ignorant, bigoted one, at that.

What you think of that young man in the 41second video...is totally irrelevant to the issue (and to me).

Other than having no idea what a "screed" is you seemingly did not address my post at all...
 
The story alleges someone in her group of friends was using racial slurs. That may be an allegation to make the criminal out as the victim.

:lamo
Isn't it "funny", the way you use "allege" when it comes to the part of the report that identifies the woman as a racist....yet you have no problem ASSUMING as fact that she was murdered by "BLM"?

After all, we KNOW she was a racist. We have no idea who killed her.

I guess that's just how the minds of perpetually aggrieved white natties are wired, huh?
 
Other than having no idea what a "screed" is you seemingly did not address my post at all...

1. Re-read my remarks. If you are still having difficulty, too bad.
2. Find a dictionary and look up "screed". That, you can do for yourself.
 
1. Re-read my remarks. If you are still having difficulty, too bad.
2. Find a dictionary and look up "screed". That, you can do for yourself.

Too bad yourself... I said it first so I win. Great game though. Let me know when you want to start actually debating.
 
Back
Top Bottom