- Joined
- Jan 17, 2022
- Messages
- 12,627
- Reaction score
- 12,593
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Nope.The Supreme Court affirmed that right back in 1857
Wrong again.1857 is less than 200 years after the founding
YepNope.
Nothing I’ve said had been wrong.Wrong again.
Oh, so Trump wants to release the White Nationalist Proud Boys from jail because he's part of the White Nationalist Brotherhood, got it, makes sense now. (snark)Yup - that's pretty much it. When you look at what the judge did - releasing a suspect who tried to kill people - then you have to figure it's about race.
What bullshit ruling do you speak of?Yep
Nothing I’ve said had been wrong.
So the judge released the guy into house arrest with a GPS because the guy is black? If the guy were white the black judge would jail him, is that right?So was this guy:
Illinois man on pretrial release kills wife in murder-suicide
VILLA PARK, Ill. (WTVO) — A man arrested on domestic battery charges in Chicago was on pretrial release when he killed his wife in a murder-suicide, authorities said. Police in Villa Park were call…www.mystateline.com
Ankle monitors are becoming as effective and big a joke as TROs.
Dred Scott is the first mention of the individual right to keep and bear arms. Dozens of Supreme Court rulings since, including miller, heller, Caetano, McDonald and Bruen have told you what firearms you can’t ban.What bullshit ruling do you speak of?
OH MY GOD!!....The Dred Scott decision has NOTHING to do with gun control. What an idiotic statement!!Dred Scott is the first mention of the individual right to keep and bear arms. Dozens of Supreme Court rulings since, including miller, heller, Caetano, McDonald and Bruen have told you what firearms you can’t ban.
Wow, what a racist post. Americans have really let themselves go.Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.
Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'
A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.www.yahoo.com
It’s the first time the Supreme Court stated it’s an individual right.OH MY GOD!!....The Dred Scott decision has NOTHING to do with gun control. What an idiotic statement!!
And dozens of other scotus rulings since then have reaffirmed the individual right and what you can and can’t ban lol.Regardless...the Dred Scott decision was overturned by the 13th and 14th Amendments....because the Dred Scott decision was about the rights of escaped slaves and black people in the U.S.
This is called a strawman. The court had told you what you can’t ban. And that’s any firearm in common use.And there is NO Supreme Court decision that states American citizens can own EVERY type of gun. Not even Heller. You are simply making shit up.
Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.
Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'
A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.www.yahoo.com
From reading that article, it appears that the judge decided house arrest was sufficient.Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.
Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'
A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.www.yahoo.com
A spokesperson for the D.C. court system told Fox News Digital all defendants "have a presumption of innocence."
"In this matter — after hearing arguments from both sides and the arguments for detention — the judge determined that 24-hour home confinement on electronic monitoring with the education and social services already in place for the defendant that release, on these strict conditions did ‘ensure the safety of the defendant and the public,'" the spokesperson added.
The spokesperson also told Fox News Digital the defense "relied heavily" on the fact that Moody had no prior encounters with law enforcement, and he was provided educational support and family and community resources.
"Judge Nolan conducted a very thorough hearing … and spoke directly with defendant about the consequences of violating any portion of the release conditions," the spokesperson said.
And I suspect you agree with their disagreement.The decision to release Moody on house arrest prompted outrage from many on social media. And prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., requested an emergency hearing scheduled for May 22 to discuss the matter and potentially reverse it.
"The government presented evidence establishing probable cause that the defendant fired an AR-15 weapon approximately 26 times at a car driving away on a public street in the 1700 block of Independence Ave SE then dissembled the firearm and hid it away in a ceiling," the prosecutors wrote.
"Despite the egregiousness of this conduct, the strength of the case, including video evidence depicting it and two identifications of the defendant as the shooter, and the statutory presumption in favor of detention pending trial, the Magistrate Judge released the defendant."
Black judge releases black kid whose shot black rifle into black car in black neighbourhood where everything was blacketty-black black black.
Are you scared yet folks, have I said it enough times?
Oh one more thing...BLACK!
You don't know what it is, and everything you say it's a waste of time to explain to you.HAHAHA Did you really say that.?? You think affirmative action is equal opportunity????
You said 'you' but you meant you.Yup - that's pretty much it. When you look at what the judge did - releasing a suspect who tried to kill people - then you have to figure it's about race.
Some have.Wow, what a racist post. Americans have really let themselves go.
You libs support affirmative action so don't call other people racist.
So what?? So did the 2nd Amendment!! What's your point??It’s the first time the Supreme Court stated it’s an individual right.
Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.
Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'
A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.www.yahoo.com
You were wrong lol.So what?? So did the 2nd Amendment!! What's your point??
The Supreme Court had told you what you can’t ban. And that is any firearm in common use.The Supreme Court has NEVER said that Americans can own ANY type of gun they want...PERIOD!!
I’m sorry that you don’t know what you are talking about regarding constitutional law and firearms. But now that you’ve been schooled, you have no excuse.The Dred Scott decision...for ****'s sake, how stupid.
No, you were. You mistakenly said that guns rights advocates have been saying for over 200 years that the 2nd Amendment gives you a right to own ANY type of gun.You were wrong lol.
NopeNo, you were.
Strawman. I’ve correctly pointed out they the supreme court has repeatedly told you what you can’t ban.You mistakenly said that guns rights advocates have been saying for over 200 years that the 2nd Amendment gives you a right to own ANY type of gun.
Nope.That is factually incorrect.
Proven false.Gun rights advocates did not start making this absurd argument until the 1980s.
Strawman. The Supreme Court had told you what can’t be banned.And the Supreme Court has NEVER said the 2nd Amendment gives you a right to own ANY type of gun.
I’m sorry that you’ve had your position curb stomped. But making shit up and pretending I said it doesn’t make you any less hilariously incorrect.But please....keep pulling more irrelevant bullshit out of your ass like your ****ing ridiculous comment about the Dred Scott decision.
You do realize that posting stupid shit that demonstrates that you have zero idea what you are talking about doesn’t make a good argument right?Nah.
Lie. AR-15s are not for self-defense. Semi-automatic weapons are not for self-defense. And the NRA and MAGA gun nuts are butthurt any time the government tries to ban these types of guns.
Sorry. I don't care about the white trash technical definition about what is or is not considered an assault rifle.You do realize that posting stupid shit that demonstrates that you have zero idea what you are talking about doesn’t make a good argument right?
Yes we all know a black judge can’t possibly uphold the law if the suspect is black. This must be because of race.Another DEI (Didn't Earn It) judge practicing pro-black racism.
Judge facing heat for releasing alleged DC teen shooter donated to Soros tied fund, posted about being 'woke'
A judge criticized for letting a teen who allegedly opened fire on a busy street out of jail before trial previously posted online about being "woke" and donated to a Soros group.www.yahoo.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?