CaughtInThe
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 108,829
- Reaction score
- 108,793
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
He's obviously one of the "elites" so he will be ignored by the unwashed MAGA masses.Billionaire Ken Griffin hopes ‘three-time’ loser Trump steps aside
Billionaire Ken Griffin, the founder of the global investment firm Citadel, said former President Trump is a “three-time loser” who should step aside in the 2024 presidential election. Griffin sai…thehill.com
We're all about to witness some very ugly days within the Republican party.
"The three losses Griffin referenced are Trump’s 2020 reelection defeat, the party’s loss of two Georgia Senate seats in January 2021 runoffs and this year’s midterms."
Which then means more of their Social Security checks will have to fill the void.He's obviously one of the "elites" so he will be ignored by the unwashed MAGA masses.
the cult certainly wants him to run again. and they don't appear to care if he burns the Republican party to the ground (which he will).We all hope that he steps aside.
This obsession with him is wearing us out.
Yes, the New York Times and MSNBC need Trump so that they can keep their audiences, but if they look hard enough, they can find some other (Republican) target!
But Trump-supporting media don't need Trump to keep their audiences?We all hope that he steps aside.
This obsession with him is wearing us out.
Yes, the New York Times and MSNBC need Trump so that they can keep their audiences, but if they look hard enough, they can find some other (Republican) target!
The New York Times has prospered since before the Trump family ever came to America; and will prosper well after Trump is in the grave. They do not need Trump, and would be far better off without him. The same with NBC. Trump is just a blight on American society. We will ALL be better off once he is gone.We all hope that he steps aside.
This obsession with him is wearing us out.
Yes, the New York Times and MSNBC need Trump so that they can keep their audiences, but if they look hard enough, they can find some other (Republican) target!
The New York Times has prospered since before the Trump family ever came to America; and will prosper well after Trump is in the grave. They do not need Trump, and would be far better off without him. The same with NBC. Trump is just a blight on American society. We will ALL be better off once he is gone.
If you want a network that likely prospers because of Trump.... you can look to OAN or NewsMax. Those faux news sites would not have an audience save for the safe haven from the truth they provide MAGA people. FoxNews would also have to learn how to make a profit on truth as they have been operating substantially truth free for a decade.
The New York Times has prospered since before the Trump family ever came to America; and will prosper well after Trump is in the grave. They do not need Trump, and would be far better off without him. The same with NBC. Trump is just a blight on American society. We will ALL be better off once he is gone.
If you want a network that likely prospers because of Trump.... you can look to OAN or NewsMax. Those faux news sites would not have an audience save for the safe haven from the truth they provide MAGA people. FoxNews would also have to learn how to make a profit on truth as they have been operating substantially truth free for a decade.
Thanks for your views.The New York Times has prospered since before the Trump family ever came to America; and will prosper well after Trump is in the grave. They do not need Trump, and would be far better off without him. The same with NBC. Trump is just a blight on American society. We will ALL be better off once he is gone.
If you want a network that likely prospers because of Trump.... you can look to OAN or NewsMax. Those faux news sites would not have an audience save for the safe haven from the truth they provide MAGA people. FoxNews would also have to learn how to make a profit on truth as they have been operating substantially truth free for a decade.
Then make it 5. Lost the popular vote in 2016 and the Congress in 2018.Billionaire Ken Griffin hopes ‘three-time’ loser Trump steps aside
Billionaire Ken Griffin, the founder of the global investment firm Citadel, said former President Trump is a “three-time loser” who should step aside in the 2024 presidential election. Griffin sai…thehill.com
We're all about to witness some very ugly days within the Republican party.
"The three losses Griffin referenced are Trump’s 2020 reelection defeat, the party’s loss of two Georgia Senate seats in January 2021 runoffs and this year’s midterms."
I'm always curious what you mean by 'rights'? Americans are not that free, and things won't change as institutions do not change less by force. Trump would never have been able to pull a dictatorship-role as he is too stupid and too old. Trump is way past his prime, if he was still in his forties-ok, he might have a chance. But today? Just not possible.By slim a majority, the American people have chosen democracy over a dictatorship. If that doesn't freak you out, what will? I cannot imagine not having the rights assigned by the constitution. Yet, there are millions of people who both vote and think we'd be better off without them, they want to be told what to think. Those same people believe there is no room for open debate. We can laugh about Trump's candidacy but the reality is depending on how the economy is in 2024, he could win again. If that doesn't scare the sh*t out of you, it should. Crazy Kari Lake almost won in AZ, and she is nuttier than Trump.
Their quest for audiences is what GAVE us Trump in the first place.We all hope that he steps aside.
This obsession with him is wearing us out.
Yes, the New York Times and MSNBC need Trump so that they can keep their audiences, but if they look hard enough, they can find some other (Republican) target!
You are mistaken. I don't think you "read" any such thing, you heard Trump tell you that.Thanks for your views.
I may be mistaken, but I remember reading that the Times was close to bankruptcy until the Trump Phenomenon came along, and then its digital subscriptions soared as it became the leader of the media Resistance, and traumatized Democrats looked to it for daily comfort. As a journalist manque, I was fascinated to learn that its print edition front page always had 3 or 4 anti-Trump articles.
Griffin is a hedge-fund piece of $hit who got run out of Illinois.We all hope that he steps aside.
This obsession with him is wearing us out.
Yes, the New York Times and MSNBC need Trump so that they can keep their audiences, but if they look hard enough, they can find some other (Republican) target!
You remember reading ?Thanks for your views.
I may be mistaken, but I remember reading that the Times was close to bankruptcy until the Trump Phenomenon came along, and then its digital subscriptions soared as it became the leader of the media Resistance, and traumatized Democrats looked to it for daily comfort. As a journalist manque, I was fascinated to learn that its print edition front page always had 3 or 4 anti-Trump articles.
Let me try and clear things up. Americans have a bill of rights;I'm always curious what you mean by 'rights'? Americans are not that free, and things won't change as institutions do not change less by force. Trump would never have been able to pull a dictatorship-role as he is too stupid and too old. Trump is way past his prime, if he was still in his forties-ok, he might have a chance. But today? Just not possible.
The two-party system makes sure the narrative is controlled and won't be accepting others.
Thanks for your views.
I may be mistaken, but I remember reading that the Times was close to bankruptcy until the Trump Phenomenon came along, and then its digital subscriptions soared as it became the leader of the media Resistance, and traumatized Democrats looked to it for daily comfort. As a journalist manque, I was fascinated to learn that its print edition front page always had 3 or 4 anti-Trump articles.
Their quest for audiences is what GAVE us Trump in the first place.
Me too. He will lose everything again in 2024.I'm good with him running.
Reporting on a buffoonish candidate is what Dems spent millions on this primary season, in the hopes of finding easy to beat opponents. Sometimes it backfires.That’s just plain idiotic.
The Times and MSNBC weren’t the ones who sang the trump song for six years.
Trump did not give interviews to the Times or MSNBC. But he was on Fox constantly.
That was Fox and right wing talk radio. Bolstered by the Russians and a bunch of guys on YouTube.
Newsmax and OAN wouldn’t exist without Trump and may not live long after him.
Reporting on a buffoonish candidate who went on to foment an insurrection, is not promotion.
Fox did the promotion.
By slim a majority, the American people have chosen democracy over a dictatorship.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?