• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill would prevent ICE from detaining or deporting U.S. citizens

Thank you for your useless opinion on the matter.
Katie Johnson is far from the only woman who accused Trump of rape. E Jean Carrol, for example, won her case in court, repeatedly. He raped his ex-wife.

There’s actually a ton of real hard evidence in the real world you’re denying when you defend Donald Trump with your appeal to ignorance fallacy.
 
Katie Johnson is far from the only woman who accused Trump of rape. E Jean Carrol, for example, won her case in court, repeatedly. He raped his ex-wife.

There’s actually a ton of real hard evidence in the real world you’re denying when you defend Donald Trump with your appeal to ignorance fallacy.
See, when you enter the conversation in an attempt to pile on, you should probably know what is being discussed before doing so. Also, I'm not defending Trump. Maybe next time you'll think before you speak? Fingers crossed for you.
 
See, when you enter the conversation in an attempt to pile on, you should probably know what is being discussed before doing so. Also, I'm not defending Trump. Maybe next time you'll think before you speak? Fingers crossed for you.
You were aware there is already evidence that Trump is a child rapist, since you are aware of Katie Johnson’s claims.

There is evidence that he’s a rapist. There is evidence that he barged in on naked underage girls. There is evidence that he placed underage girls in the employ of Epstein and Maxwell. There is evidence that he was both aware and approved of Epstein’s sexual use of underage girls. There is evidence that he trafficked underage girls with his modeling agency, which is actually disgustingly common in the modeling industry. There’s actually so much related evidence, it’s hard to keep track of it all.

When you deny this mountain of evidence against Trump, that is absolutely, unequivocally, defending Trump.
 
Billion threads already. Feel free to click on any of them.
You failed to show your citation of the head of the GOP being convicted of child rape. Why is that?
 
Disingenuousness doesn't really move the needle. It's pretty clear you know what I'm referring to, and it's pretty clear you don't find it compelling, right? Surely you can form an opinion based on what everyone has been talking about since the other day, yeah?

Or are you demanding I show you a conviction in a court of law? Is that what you're requesting? Is that why you're pretending to not have been online or near a news site in the last 48-72?
Notice how you can’t provide any evidence or citation for you moronic claim? Everyone else noticed that too.
 
You were aware there is already evidence that Trump is a child rapist, since you are aware of Katie Johnson’s claims.

There is evidence that he’s a rapist. There is evidence that he barged in on naked underage girls. There is evidence that he placed underage girls in the employ of Epstein and Maxwell. There is evidence that he was both aware and approved of Epstein’s sexual use of underage girls. There is evidence that he trafficked underage girls with his modeling agency, which is actually disgustingly common in the modeling industry. There’s actually so much related evidence, it’s hard to keep track of it all.

When you deny this mountain of evidence against Trump, that is absolutely, unequivocally, defending Trump.
That isn't evidence, that's allegations. You failed to make a valid point, yet again.
 
This may surprise you, but things happen in reality without being proven to you to your personal satisfaction.
Bingo. That's ultimately what that whole thing is about. They ask for sources so they can put themselves in a position to validate info.
 
Bingo. That's ultimately what that whole thing is about. They ask for sources so they can put themselves in a position to validate info.
Asking for sources to validate the claim that YOU made. To verify what you are referring to, and to show you aren't just pulling it out of the air.

But sure, you don't have to 'play that game' - just say whatever pops in your head.
 
Asking for sources to validate the claim that YOU made. To verify what you are referring to, and to show you aren't just pulling it out of the air.

But sure, you don't have to 'play that game' - just say whatever pops in your head.
Magically nothing provided is ever proof of anything. Amazingly, the response is always the same "Nah". Waste. Of. Time.
 
That isn't evidence, that's allegations. You failed to make a valid point, yet again.
Incorrect, statements made by the accused and the testimonies of women raped, molested, groped, and harassed by the accused are all evidence. I’ll note again that your misinformed denial is a defense of Trump.
 
Sounds like Snopes - which isn't a fan of Trump - even views the claims as dubious.

Assuming that's what the poster is even referring to.

Virginia Louise Giuffre (née Roberts; August 9, 1983 – April 25, 2025) was an American-Australian advocate of justice for survivors of sex trafficking and one of the most prominent and vocal accusers of child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre created Victims Refuse Silence, a non-profit organization in the United States, in 2015, which was relaunched under the name Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (SOAR) in November 2021. She gave a detailed account to many American and British reporters about her experiences of being trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
In mid-2000, Giuffre met Ghislaine Maxwellwhen working as a spa attendant at Donald Trump's private Mar-a-Lago club while reading a book about massage therapy.
There was a pipeline of little girls from Trump to Epstein.


Katie Johnson isn’t the only little girl who was hurt by Trump.
 
Incorrect, statements made by the accused and the testimonies of women raped, molested, groped, and harassed by the accused are all evidence. I’ll note again that your misinformed denial is a defense of Trump.
The accusation is that 'the leader of the GOP is a child molester'.

Sure, there have been various accusations by women, but that's not the claim.
 
There was a pipeline of little girls from Trump to Epstein.
Trying to use a Wikipedia article saying that Epstein met a 17 year old working at a Trump property to "a pipeline of little girls" and stretch it to "a pipeline of little girls" is a bit silly.

Katie Johnson isn’t the only little girl who was hurt by Trump.
If you read the snopes article, there's no proof that Katie Johnson even existed. But absolutely - what other "little girls" were hurt by Trump?
 
Ahh yes, the accusation that has not been proven. The lawsuit was filed, refiled and dropped in the span of 5 months. Do you still believe Tawana Brawley, Jussie Smollett and Crystal Mangum as well? What about "hands up, don't shoot"? Or how about the Easter bunny?

Accusations don't make one guilty. If they did, I could accuse you of all sorts of heinous things, but it wouldn't make them true.

Thanks for attempting to play.
Katie and her family were intimidated By Trump through Cohen.

Defending a child-rapist like trump is a bad look. You really should stop.

Trump is a racist scumbag. He's a liar, a thief. a mobster, a rapist, a convicted felon, a serial adulterer, and spent large amounts of time with Epstein on his island and on his planes.

Please tell me that you are not willing to cover for such a person.
 
The accusation is that 'the leader of the GOP is a child molester'.

Sure, there have been various accusations by women, but that's not the claim.
What do you think, here? That a little girl could not have been raped because, if she had, she would have been able to hand you ironclad evidence like a video recording or something?

And it’s not an isolated accusation. Trump was a close associate of both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Some of the most damning evidence against Trump are his own statements regarding how he treats women; like barging into underage girls changing rooms at his beauty contests, grabbing women by the *****, knowing that Epstein liked young girls.



There’s no question that he’s a ****ing creep. Meanwhile, in MAGA land:

IMG_2445.webp
 
Trying to use a Wikipedia article saying that Epstein met a 17 year old working at a Trump property to "a pipeline of little girls" and stretch it to "a pipeline of little girls" is a bit silly.


If you read the snopes article, there's no proof that Katie Johnson even existed. But absolutely - what other "little girls" were hurt by Trump?
There’s literal video testimony from Katie Johnson.



You can close your eyes and pretend the sun doesn’t exist, if you want, but that little trick won’t work on other people.
 
What do you think, here? That a little girl could not have been raped because, if she had, she would have been able to hand you ironclad evidence like a video recording or something?
Again, even according to 'fact checkers' that are hardly favorable to trump, the accusations are questionable. Highlighting that they came from a Jerry Springer show producer, acting under an alias.

And it’s not an isolated accusation. Trump was a close associate of both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

[deflection removed]

The request was for a poster to provide some support for the accusation. which neither you nor the poster have done. No need to keep flailing.
 
Again, even according to 'fact checkers' that are hardly favorable to trump, the accusations are questionable. Highlighting that they came from a Jerry Springer show producer, acting under an alias.



The request was for a poster to provide some support for the accusation. which neither you nor the poster have done. No need to keep flailing.
My argument is not that the evidence is unquestionable, it is that the evidence exists.
 
Back
Top Bottom