• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,676]

Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

What do this garbage prove?

Preparations to "burn down" classified holdings and crypto equipment are some of the actions that flow from the war zone designation.
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

[h=1]U.S. EMBASSY IN ARGENTINA DENIES IT IS SEEKING TO UNDERMINE JUNTA[/h] [h=6]By EDWARD SCHUMACHER, Special to the New York Times[/h] [h=6]Published: May 17, 1982[/h] BUENOS AIRES, May 16— The United States Embassy here has been accused by Argentine newspapers of trying to undermine the ruling junta in the Falkland Islands crisis, but it responded today by denying any ''inappropriate conduct.''
The embassy's unusual statement followed publication here of accusations that the United States Ambassador, Harry W. Shlaudeman, and other embassy officials had met with opposition political leaders in an attempt to ''destabilize'' the military Government led by Gen. Leopoldo Galtieri.
The newspaper accusations cited unidentified sources high in the military Government. Argentine journalists and Western diplomats said the sources for the accusations were leading officers in the junta.
''The United States Embassy flatly denies any inappropriate conduct,'' the embassy statement said, ''and has no real idea what this is all about.''
The accusations raise a potentially dangerous issue when relations between Washington and Buenos Aires are already strained because of United States support for Britain in the Falkland conflict. A number of United States diplomats, businessmen and journalists have received threats, and the embassy has evacuated some dependents.

And this one?
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

Preparations to "burn down" classified holdings and crypto equipment are some of the actions that flow from the war zone designation.

There was no war zone designation. See post #1117
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

There was no war zone designation. See post #1117

That is an entirely separate matter between the U.K. and Argentina. I have been discussing a U.S. intra-government administrative/security designation.
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

That is an entirely separate matter between the U.K. and Argentina. I have been discussing a U.S. intra-government administrative/security designation.
For what reason?
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

Reason for the designation? Or reason to discuss it?

What does it have to do with BillO?
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

You Americans have interesting politics, thats for sure.

Canadian politics are sooooooooooo boring compared to yours
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

He's not the only one who called mainland Argentina a war zone.
You are indeed funny.
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

You Americans have interesting politics, thats for sure.

Canadian politics are sooooooooooo boring compared to yours

Because Canada is boring.

(And I come from a long line of French Canadians, on my grandfather's side...)
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67


O'Reilly has claimed he has "seen guys gun down nuns in El Salvador" and "was in El Salvador and I saw nuns get shot in the back of the head" during his time as a CBS correspondent. The incident that O'Reilly appears to be referring to is the well-documented execution of four churchwomen by the Salvadoran national guard in December 1980. After this event, experts say that there were no priests or nuns killed in the country for more than eight years.

But in his book The No Spin Zone, the host writes that he did not begin covering the civil war in El Salvador until "a few weeks" after he began as a CBS News correspondent in 1981 -- the year after the execution took place.

"Before I went to El Salvador in 1981, I talked with some experienced Latin American experts, people who had seen the brutal wars down there for themselves," O'Reilly said on "The O'Reilly Factor" in February 2002. "I had never been in a war zone before, so I wanted some prep."

The Fox host also said during a 2009 interview on WVVH-TV's American Dreams Show that he arrived in El Salvador "right after" the murders.

"O'Reilly could not possibly have witnessed the murder of the churchwomen if his own timeline is to be believed," Media Matters argued.

O'Reilly Also Lied About Witnessing Nuns' Execution in El Salvador, Report Claims
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

Just a humble servant of the factual record.
You do not seem to accept the fact that Bill O'Reilly exaggerated to his lilsteners/readers what he did there. He says his was sent there to cover the war, but he never tells you the Argentina militia would not let any news people to come close.
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

You do not seem to accept the fact that Bill O'Reilly exaggerated to his lilsteners/readers what he did there. He says his was sent there to cover the war, but he never tells you the Argentina militia would not let any news people to come close.

A reporter does not have to be at the site of combat to cover a war. In fact, most cover combat from a distance. I think BO accurately described his situation.
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

A reporter does not have to be at the site of combat to cover a war. In fact, most cover combat from a distance. I think BO accurately described his situation.
How do you cover a war when Buenos Aires is the only place to go? And it is 1200 miles away?
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

How do you cover a war when Buenos Aires is the only place to go? And it is 1200 miles away?

All the reporters went to BA to cover the war. Most reporters cover most wars most of the time from the capital city.
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

1982 Apr 13 Tu
Archive (Rentschler MSS)
[h=1]Falklands: Jim Rentschler diary (Haig second London visit concludes) [US close to abandoning mediation; US Embassy in Buenos Aires readied for evacuation] [/h]
Document type:archive
Document kind:Diary
Venue:-
Source:Thatcher Archive (copy of the text per the late Ambassador Rentschler)
Journalist:-
Editorial comments:Jim Rentschler was the NSC official responsible for European matters, who handled the Falklands for the White House throughout the crisis. He gave a photocopy of the original diary to the Margaret Thatcher Foundation for publication in 2003. The full Falklands diary can be read here as single text.
Importance ranking:Major
Word count:387 words
Themes:Defence (Falklands War 1982), Foreign policy (USA)
[h=3]Tuesday 13 April 1982[/h] We're finally wrapping it, but not until five this afternoon. And we will never know the exact time of departure until some thirty minutes before it comes due. The first part of the day is mired in extreme pessimism; Haig's phone discussion with his Argentine opposite number late last night left very little room for maneuver, and while he is over at Number Ten for one last round of talks with Maggie alone, his staff crashes on a press conference/wrap-up contingency which suspends the US diplomatic process and essentially puts the blame on Argentina. This may be the lowest point of the whole project, dramatized by the FLASH from B.A. which puts the Embassy's crypto files and equipment "two hours from burn" and by the clandestine reporting we have received from inside the S.I.A., Argentina's goon-ridden security service which has already targeted a number of Embassy personnel who are, in that entity's quaint parlance, "to be disappeared" (in the same way that Stavisky was "suicided"). [This is a reference to the murky death in Jan 1934 of the politically well-conected French embezzler Alexandre Stavisky, a Madoff-type character who was officially declared to have shot himself. The bullet, however, had apparently travelled some distance, leading some to theorise sarcastically that he must have had a "long arm"]. By the time Haig gets back to the Churchill later this morning, however, the roller-coaster is in the ascendant again: a call from Costa Mendez suggests a tiny crack of Argentine daylight - language from some 1960 General Assembly resolution on decolonization which the UK had not voted against, merely abstained on, and which fudges the basic sovereignty/self-determination issues - and Foreign Secretary Pym is on his way over to the hotel to confer with Haig on this development. Who knows what's going to happen next? Pym, when we next meet him in the noisy little corner room at the end of the corridor, overlooking the rush of Upper Berkeley Street traffic, seems open to exploring the Argentine move, and at the very least we may have bought some additional time (this is the message I give Judge Clark, whose phone call summons me out of Haig's meeting; he will be briefing the President a few minutes from now and needs an update on the whole crisis). [fo.163 begins]

Goodby to Britain. … Once aloft, Haig's core group crouches around his table while he strategizes out loud on next steps, which look now to include another trip to B.A. two days from now. Vamos � ver … "[Let's see" …]
Read next entry
Read previous entry
Go back to the beginning

Not one bit of that declares all of Argentina a "war zone."
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

Actually, Roger Ailes decides, when Rupert Murdoch decides, based on public opinion whether O'Reilly gets to keep his job or not

Actually, Fox News seeks to manipulate public opinion and Roger Ailes decides how, and Ailes decides if O'Reilly loses his job.
 
Re: Bill O'Reilly has his own made up war stories. I wonder if Fox will[W:237,343,67

Still going at it?? Give it up, you lost this one.

At the end of the day its public opinion that decides whether O'Reilly gets to keep his job. And guess what, the calls for him to be suspended or fired arent there, not from the Left nor from the Right. At least not in sufficient numbers.

Therefore O'Reilly stays, and Brian Williams takes a hike :2wave:

Thanks for playing

He put SO much effort into this red herring. He initially said it was far worse than Brian Williams lies.

Lol !! You would think people would learn NOT to use hack sites to back up their fantasies but then again, he's a Liberal for a good reason.
 
Back
Top Bottom