• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill Nye on 'once-in-a-lifetime' floods occurring three times this week

For those who say floods are getting worse, or more numerous.
Here's a list of historic floods. They have always happened, and will continue to happen

You don’t really have a grasp on the concept that dams, locks, and flood controls have been built on US waterways for a hundred years to control flooding, which is why bad floods happened historically, and scientists are telling us flooding is becoming more frequent and intense.

 
The thing about global warming is that it is based on such simple science that even a 7th grade level of education is sufficient.

It is very simple to understand that pumping tons of carbon into the atmosphere can change how much of the sun’s radiation is absorbed by our atmosphere.

You're basically right about this. The underlying phenomena around CO2 levels in the atmosphere are very complex, but the bottom line is that if you put enough excess CO2 into the air for long enough, there will be problems.

However, L88 is also right to point out that Nye does not have a degree in any physical science. Holding him up as an authority on this or any other scientific issue isn't valid.

In other words, yeah, anthropogenic global warming is almost certainly happening. But not because Bill Nye the Science Guy says so.
 
You don’t really have a grasp on the concept that dams, locks, and flood controls have been built on US waterways for a hundred years to control flooding, which is why bad floods happened historically, and scientists are telling us flooding is becoming more frequent and intense.

Do you believe everything your scientists are telling you??
 
CFCs were about the hole in the ozone layer. Humanity actually did a good job regulating CFCs and thereby repairing the hole in the ozone layer.

Thankfully, the people profiting off of CFCs didn’t run a successful propaganda campaign on our dumbest voters.

Many if not all CFCs have higher greenhouse effects than CO2, as well as ozone depletion potential. Their substitutes, HCFCs, have less ozone depletion potential, but also tend to be potent greenhouse gases.

Water has a higher greenhouse warming effect than CO2, but fortunately its concentration in the atmosphere is in equilibrium; it can't just keep growing.
 
It's even worse than that. He only has a bachelor's degree. Real engineering programs take five years.

Most working engineers have bachelor's degrees. I've known a couple of PhD engineers, but most of them don't go for advanced degrees because they can make very good money with a bachelor's degree (instead of spending more years in graduate school).
 
Do you believe everything your scientists are telling you??
Do you believe stuff because you just really, really want it to be true?

I mean, the way to interpret information and form opinions (and beliefs) is to look at the best data we have and interpret it in conjunction with the most educated people on the subject. When the best educated people on a topic tell you something that is the opposite of what you believe, you need to seriously examine why your belief would be considerably out of wack with their knowledge.

Or you could just listen to Fox News, I guess.
 
You're basically right about this. The underlying phenomena around CO2 levels in the atmosphere are very complex, but the bottom line is that if you put enough excess CO2 into the air for long enough, there will be problems.

However, L88 is also right to point out that Nye does not have a degree in any physical science. Holding him up as an authority on this or any other scientific issue isn't valid.

In other words, yeah, anthropogenic global warming is almost certainly happening. But not because Bill Nye the Science Guy says so.
Sure, he’s a TV personality who advocates for an issue.

There’s something very asinine about these right wingers pretending he’s not entitled to share his opinion because he doesn’t publish climate research in scientific journals, while at the same time they feel fully entitled to share their completely misinformed takes on global warming.
 
Sure, he’s a TV personality who advocates for an issue.

There’s something very asinine about these right wingers pretending he’s not entitled to share his opinion because he doesn’t publish climate research in scientific journals, while at the same time they feel fully entitled to share their completely misinformed takes on global warming.

I think you're overlooking an obvious aspect of this.

Of course, anyone is entitled to share their opinion.

But Nye is not an authority on the subject. His opinion is not worth more than that of anyone who has read up on it.

The objection is not to Nye, or anyone else, speaking up. It's on his being offered as an authority. He is not.

I could offer any opinion I chose to on climate change. But I would not expect to be taken as an authority because although I have an MSc. in a scientific field (which is more than Nye has), I'm not a climate scientist either.
 
So climate scientists lie? Extreme weather is not becoming more frequent that's false

In my experience it doesn't matter what happens some imbecile calling themselves a scientist will always say it's climate change.

This is starting to seem more like a religion than science.

So you shutting down the chicken littles that observe government money to scream about the sky falling

No more government-sponsored cults

Again these idiots will say everything bad that ever happens is caused by climate change it's a cult.

Science plays a very important part in our modern society. So politicians should of course listen to scientists. While at the same time, listen to different perspectives and investigate any scientific wrongdoings.



While after decades of scrutiny, Republican politicians have failed to find any faults with the overwhelming evidence for the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions or any contrary evidence.

Take for example that Trump has built his entire career on claiming that others are corrupt and lying. So of course would the Trump administration have held a “fabolous” press conference if there had been any objective reason to shut down federal climate research. Instead the administration quietly shut down the program without any explanation.
 
Last edited:
You're basically right about this. The underlying phenomena around CO2 levels in the atmosphere are very complex, but the bottom line is that if you put enough excess CO2 into the air for long enough, there will be problems.

However, L88 is also right to point out that Nye does not have a degree in any physical science. Holding him up as an authority on this or any other scientific issue isn't valid.

In other words, yeah, anthropogenic global warming is almost certainly happening. But not because Bill Nye the Science Guy says so.

The science is settled today. So the big problem is that both politicians and media focus to little on the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions. While Republican politicians are outright climate deniers and there have also been massive amounts of climate denial propaganda during the last decades.So that why it can be a need for a good communicator like Bill Nye to explain the overwhelming evidence.



Also climate scientists are experts in there field of study not communication. The public debate have also become so toxic that climate scientists are facing harassment and threats.

 
Science plays a very important part in our modern society. So politicians should of course listen to scientists.
Not when they've been predicting doomsday for 50 years and have been wrong every single time.
While at the same time, listen to different perspectives and investigate any scientific wrongdoings.
Basically the Tuesday called just disregard it's nothing it's religion for people who pretend they are atheists.


While after decades of scrutiny, Republican politicians have failed to find any faults with the overwhelming evidence for the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions or any contrary evidence.
What's the urgency is the world going to end in a couple of months we've been hearing that for about 50 years. You cried wolf a thousand times and there wasn't a damn wolf there.
Take for example that Trump has built his entire career on claiming that others are corrupt and lying. So of course would the Trump administration have held a “fabolous” press conference if there had been any objective reason to shut down federal climate research. Instead the administration quietly shut down the program without any explanation.
One of the best things he's done is shut down this cult practice. And he's a lot kinder than me I'd have these people put in federal prison if I was in charge it turns so many minds into putty. To the point where you people believe this absolutely without question that's religion that's a cult.
 
Not that you are really interested

Why would you say that? Is the point around this forum just to automatically be nasty?


but yes there are plans.

Project Drawdown: the most comprehensive plan to reverse global warming

The project, led by activist and entrepreneur Paul Hawken, was started in 2013 and has since brought together over 65 researchers from across the globe with 128 experts in climate, sustainability, academia, and business. Together this group developed a unique global systems model, evaluating 80 technologies and practices from the ground up – from innovative energy and agricultural methods to enhanced environmental conservation and restoration.

The results shocked even the experts. Combined it was shown that these 80 solutions could eliminate 1 trillion tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere by 2050, enough to prevent the dangerous climate tipping point of 2 degrees Celsius. Moreover, these solutions would cost less than and produce more jobs that business as usual.

What is drawdown? It is the reversal of greenhouse gases that have built up in our atmosphere primarily from the burning of fossil fuels – coal, oil, and natural gas. Fortunately, major advancements have been made in the past decade to mitigate this problem.

All solutions presented in Drawdown are not just hypothetical. They are real, well-understood technologies and processes that can be scaled around the world. The breakthrough research required for the book has resulted in dozens of new scientific papers, and there are 20 more solutions coming that could create an even greater reduction in greenhouse gases.

Below are the top 10 solutions in order of greatest impact:


  1. Hi-tech Refrigeration
  2. Onshore Wind Power
  3. Reducing Food Waste
  4. Plant-rich diets
  5. Tropical Forest Protection
  6. Educating girls
  7. Family Planning
  8. Utility-scale Solar
  9. Silvopasture
  10. Rooftop Solar
https://www.oneearth.org/project-drawdown-the-most-comprehensive-plan-to-reverse-global-warming/

Is there a high level summary that outlines the entire plan, including the overall costs, where all the resources coming from, required timelines, how to convince the world's governments to implement it, what we're all going to have to give up to achieve it, and so on? All I can find on that site are vague idealistic marketing materials and some detailed explanations of dozens of different individual things that can theoretically be done to mitigate the problem (but a lot of which, especially some of the supposedly most impactful ones, would be a very very hard sell).
 
Not when they've been predicting doomsday for 50 years and have been wrong every single time.

Basically the Tuesday called just disregard it's nothing it's religion for people who pretend they are atheists.

What's the urgency is the world going to end in a couple of months we've been hearing that for about 50 years. You cried wolf a thousand times and there wasn't a damn wolf there.

One of the best things he's done is shut down this cult practice. And he's a lot kinder than me I'd have these people put in federal prison if I was in charge it turns so many minds into putty. To the point where you people believe this absolutely without question that's religion that's a cult.

The devastating effects of climate change are being felt all across the world.



While people like you have become so radicalized that you want to lock up scientists for doing their jobs. There the Trump administration is heading in that direction. For example how federal employees was harassed and threatened after being targeted by Musk.


People are also now being detained for using their right to free speech.


 
Last edited:
Why would you say that? Is the point around this forum just to automatically be nasty?




Is there a high level summary that outlines the entire plan, including the overall costs, where all the resources coming from, required timelines, how to convince the world's governments to implement it, what we're all going to have to give up to achieve it, and so on? All I can find on that site are vague idealistic marketing materials and some detailed explanations of dozens of different individual things that can theoretically be done to mitigate the problem (but a lot of which, especially some of the supposedly most impactful ones, would be a very very hard sell).

There are many examples of that a transition away from fossil fuel is not only possible but also have a lot of benefits. For example rapid technological advancement have led to that also Republican voters now sees the benefits with renewable energy. Even with Trump administration doing all they can to delay the transition.


Also for example rapid advancement in electric cars there it's a need to catch up with China.


While it's also possible to create both environmental and social more sustainable societies.

 
The devastating effects of climate change are being felt all across the world.
They've been saying that for 50 years


While people like you have become so radicalized that you want to lock up scientists for doing their jobs.
I'm radicalized by being lied to so much.
There the Trump administration is heading in that direction. For example how federal employees was harassed and threatened after being targeted by Musk.


People are also now being detained for using their right to free speech.


 
They've been saying that for 50 years

I'm radicalized by being lied to so much.

So that’s why you like running after cancer causing wind turbines now?
 
Yes. We need to listen to more serious sources and go chasing after cancer causing wind turbines and autism-causing vaccines.
Do as you wish.
 
The real idiots are the people who believe we're going to stop floods and hurricanes by subsidizing windmills and solar panels.
No one believes that. But starting somewhere is much better than sweeping the problem under the carpet. How can it hurt to cut back on burning fossil fuels? No matter where you do it, it is a positive move.
 
There are many examples of that a transition away from fossil fuel is not only possible but also have a lot of benefits. For example rapid technological advancement have led to that also Republican voters now sees the benefits with renewable energy. Even with Trump administration doing all they can to delay the transition.


Also for example rapid advancement in electric cars there it's a need to catch up with China.


While it's also possible to create both environmental and social more sustainable societies.


Those are not comprehensive plans, and that doesn't answer my question about the only one identified in response to my original question.
 
Why would you say that? Is the point around this forum just to automatically be nasty?




Is there a high level summary that outlines the entire plan, including the overall costs, where all the resources coming from, required timelines, how to convince the world's governments to implement it, what we're all going to have to give up to achieve it, and so on? All I can find on that site are vague idealistic marketing materials and some detailed explanations of dozens of different individual things that can theoretically be done to mitigate the problem (but a lot of which, especially some of the supposedly most impactful ones, would be a very very hard sell).
LOL The basic plan is quite simple and it requires that we replace fossil energy with other sources and reduce emissions of methane and other powerful greenhouse gases. We must slow and then stop the burning of fossil fuels ASAP. Yes this goal will entail costs but the rewards are that we will experience far less negative effects and prevent "runaway" warming where feedbacks form a loop that is no longer controllable. Before you say that these changes will cause hardships you should remember that fossil energy will run out eventually and putting off these changes will cause great harm to the planet and in turn to all its inhabitants.

 
LOL The basic plan is quite simple and it requires that we replace fossil energy with other sources and reduce emissions of methane and other powerful greenhouse gases. We must slow and then stop the burning of fossil fuels ASAP. Yes this goal will entail costs but the rewards are that we will experience far less negative effects and prevent "runaway" warming where feedbacks form a loop that is not controlable.



Can you please answer my actual question?
 
You don't have a question you have a agenda......Throwing up your hands and giving up because it is too hard to do.

What's my agenda? Are you telling me that the only way to get the answer to my question is to spend the next year combing through reams of disjointed web pages, or buy their book?

They don't have an executive summary of their plan?

Why are you so fervently dodging the question?
 
What's my agenda? Are you telling me that the only way to get the answer to my question is to spend the next year combing through reams of disjointed web pages, or buy their book?

They don't have an executive summary of their plan?

Why are you so fervently dodging the question?
Maybe if you clearly state what your question is you’ll get an answer.
 
Back
Top Bottom