You’re missing the point, Counselor.
Political parties aren’t inherently about democracy—they’re about power. Specifically, they exist to organize and maintain power in ways that benefit a ruling class or political elite. Sure, they may operate within a democratic framework, but their core function isn’t to promote democracy—it’s to win and hold power.
Parties aren’t just voluntary coalitions of like-minded citizens. They’re machines—for fundraising, candidate grooming, message control, and gatekeeping. They determine who gets on the ballot, who gets media coverage, and who receives institutional support (i.e., money). If you’re not part of the apparatus—or unwilling to play by its rules—you’re effectively shut out.
This isn’t some noble team sport. It’s a rigged system. Both major parties in the U.S. have evolved into self-perpetuating bureaucracies more focused on consolidating control than genuinely representing voters. They’ll harness populist energy when it suits them, and crush it when it threatens the status quo.
Political parties aren’t anti-democratic in name—but they’re not champions of democracy, either. They’re tools of control, not liberation. They’re run by people who want you to show up and vote—then shut up and let them govern (and enrich themselves) without interference.
Back to the topic at hand: I thought Maher’s take on his White House dinner was refreshingly honest. Maybe it bothered some people because he portrayed Trump as a human being rather than the usual “Orange Man Bad” caricature.
I remember the era when Reagan and Tip O’Neill could argue all day, then share a drink afterward. I’m not sure when or why that became a bad thing.