- Joined
- Nov 10, 2016
- Messages
- 14,607
- Reaction score
- 9,303
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Dirty Dems getting exposed for corruption in campaign finance illegal scam.
Dirty Schiff and more exposed
UPDATE: Bill Barr Indicts 8 Including Mueller Top Witness for Funneling Millions in Foreign Donations to Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and Top Senate Democrats
This is what I mean. It's not reasonable to call the Russia investigation a hoax, let alone the biggest political CT in US history.
I may be wrong, and I hope I am, but I think you misunderstood what he said. He wasn't saying that the investigation into Russian interfering in the 2016 election was a CT and a hoax... He specifically said "the collusion hoax", referring to the whole "Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election" narrative.
.
Again, not a hoax.
Sorry, but it pretty much was. There was never any compelling evidence that Trump colluded with Russia, just an unverified, uncorroborated opposition research document obtained and compiled through foreign sources, that Hillary and the DNC paid for to specifically Smear Trump before the election.
The fact that so many on the left, including prominent democrats in DC, continue to push that baseless, phony narrative really saddens me.
Dirty Dems getting exposed for corruption in campaign finance illegal scam.
Dirty Schiff and more exposed
UPDATE: Bill Barr Indicts 8 Including Mueller Top Witness for Funneling Millions in Foreign Donations to Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and Top Senate Democrats
Not sure theres a war on Christmas, but there is no question that the major media is biased to the left.
There has to be an investigation to find out exactly who knew what and when. Digging into literally every aspect of the candidates' lives, taxes, family's taxes, everything. Nothing will be off limits.
Here's a radical thought; how about banning all political contributions from anyone? What do politicians need the money for anyway; a bigger light show than the other guy? How about forcing these bastards to sell themselves on policy for a change? Give them all equal air time, and ban negative mud-slinging advertising about your opponent.
Dirty Dems getting exposed for corruption in campaign finance illegal scam.
Dirty Schiff and more exposed
UPDATE: Bill Barr Indicts 8 Including Mueller Top Witness for Funneling Millions in Foreign Donations to Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and Top Senate Democrats
Nothing about dems and shiff in that indictment.
Not only is Nader a sex offender, he's done a lot of work for republicans.
George Nader (businessman) - Wikipedia
FBI work with criminals all the time, states evidence, and all that. Don't be stupid and try and paint this as some kind of dem thing, noting that Mueller IS NOT A DEM.
If these guys are guilty they should pay the price.
Next up, Rudy, Lev, and Igor.
Here's a radical thought; how about banning all political contributions from anyone? What do politicians need the money for anyway; a bigger light show than the other guy? How about forcing these bastards to sell themselves on policy for a change? Give them all equal air time, and ban negative mud-slinging advertising about your opponent.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning campaign finance. The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.
The case arose after Citizens United, a conservative non-profit organization, sought to air and advertise a film critical of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton shortly before the 2008 Democratic primary elections. This violated the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibited any corporation or labor union from making an "electioneering communication" within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of an election, or making any expenditure advocating the election or defeat of a candidate at any time.
In a majority opinion joined by four other justices, Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy held that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act's prohibition of all independent expenditures by corporations and unions violated the First Amendment's protection of free speech.
Trump(the poster) seems to have conveniently forgotten that these same folks donated to the Trump inaugural committee as well.
Campaign finance laws are all about under handed money going to political campaigns.
Isn't that what the GOP fought for?
It would seem so. Thus far it looks like something that was a plot between Nader, Khawaja and the others. How much the recipients knew about the scheme will be interesting to discover; especially at what level of the campaigns/committee. Do you think Trump will cooperate in disclosing records?
Here's a radical thought; how about banning all political contributions from anyone? What do politicians need the money for anyway; a bigger light show than the other guy? How about forcing these bastards to sell themselves on policy for a change? Give them all equal air time, and ban negative mud-slinging advertising about your opponent.
Why are the republicans on this forum cheering this?
When they caught Flynn on similar charges the cons bitched about process crimes, or investigations in search of crimes.
When they got Manafort, and others on similar charges, the narrative was the same.
So why do they care now?
Hmm.
What charges are you referring to?
You know that's not going to happen, right?
So does Trump need to prove that he didn't know about the illegal donations to his campaign?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?