Assumes facts not in evidence. The administration is not a shit show, nor has any background you've provided on your fertilizer dump resulted in a single failure in their jobs - and certainly not tearing down their departments. None whatsoever. Try again?
OK - you're entitled to disagree. But you've yet to substantiate any claims of lack of experience or competence in their jobs. Nor even a scintilla of evidence that they're interested in destroying their departments - unlike Trump's appointees across the board.
Hey - either they're doing their jobs - or they're not. Which is it? You tell me - and with something resembling actual evidence other than "I don't agree . . . . " If not, then you're just griping about their opinions, which is nothing, and their past associations - kind of like Trump and Jeffery Epstein.
Hey - this thread was about Omarova. YOU'RE the one who tried to dump Gupta, Dunn, Sherman, et al into the mix. The effluent dump truck was YOUR move, and then you have the nerve to cry foul when I remind everyone about Trump's appointees - people selected specifically to tear the government apart ??!!?? A secretary of Education who's never seen the inside of a public school? An EPA director who's defining achievement was suing the EPA?? An idiot DoE Director who admitted he didn't even know what the department did, even though he vowed to close it during his White House run??? It just went on and on and on.
WHAT ???!!! I'm the one who set the goal posts !! - back on post #7. That goal post only involved Omarova . . . . up until your effluent dump. I set the goal posts, you kicked, and sliced wide right. No goal. You missed !!
Just goes to prove the old adage that you can't make the willfully blind to see.They aren't doing their jobs, clearly.
Per the OP's citation:
goes to show pattern.
'Properly limit' the federal government.
Sorry, but I get to bitch about whatever I want.
They aren't doing their jobs, clearly.
Per the OP's citation:
Ms. Omarova wants to put an “‘end to banking’ as we know it”—again, her words—and transfer private banking functions to the Federal Reserve, where accounts would “fully replace” private bank deposits. The Fed would control “systemically important prices” for fuel, food, raw materials, metals, natural resources, home prices and wages.She says the Fed should be remade into what she calls “The People’s Ledger.” By “the people” she means progressive elites like her. She calls for “reimagining” the role of central banks “as the ultimate public platform for generating, modulating, and allocating financial resources in a modern economy.”
By her cited words alone she's disqualified herself from any government position, much less one in control over banking. Communistical centralized economics like this simply don't work, as demonstrated in history, and are driven by ideology rather than reality.
goes to show pattern.
'Properly limit' the federal government.
Sorry, but I get to bitch about whatever I want.
Sure, sure. Go run away.
Wake me up when you have a cogent response.
You could start with Omarova's own words.
Her extremist economic policies disqualifies her from consideration. End of story.
Your subjective opinion noted and valued as such.
Exactly, none at all. Collectivism and anti-capitalist themes are often part of CRT inspired messages. Have you really not noticed?
Fact Check: True
criticalrace.org
Uh huh. Sure they are. Really scared of that CRT I see.
The lobbyist is likely to be more rational, so the latter.
Yep, the plain truth usually draws them in ... including you.
I was complimenting you. Very Fox like.
My guess is that you read more Fox News stories than do I.
I don't know why but tons of Republicans swear they don't watch Fox. It's the weirdest thing.
I don't speak for them.