• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Biden: Voters “Don’t deserve” to know my position on court packing

Do Americans deserve an answer from Biden about whether he will stack the SCOTUS or not?


  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .
Outside of the ARK that won't happen.

Kind of like outside of massive fraud, Joe Xiden won't win.

What amuses me is that you guys spend an awful lot of time right now coming up with excuses for the election.
 
I love hearing the Communists claim Trump didn't keep his promise on Obama's fascist care when the mandate is long gone.

I love hearing irresponsible citizens who confuse the concept of freedom wth the concept of them being free to take financial risks that the rest of the society pays when they have an unexpected sickness and discover that they do not have the money to cover the healthcare cost. In any case, the claim of if Trump kept or not the promise about Obamacare was not raised by me.
 
Last edited:
What amuses me is that you guys spend an awful lot of time right now coming up with excuses for the election.

I would bet that the attempted fraud by the Khmer Rouge is going to fail spectacularly and the democrat vermin will be eviscerated in November. Not only will Trump win, the Americans will take the house. We already know the Americans will retain the Senate.,

Further, I see real fear among the Communists. Polls are intended to sway the vote, not inform. Problem is, no one believes the polls. The Communists shot their wad in 2016 - along with the election tampering by the FBI, CIA, and NSA.
 
I would bet that the attempted fraud by the Khmer Rouge is going to fail spectacularly and the democrat vermin will be eviscerated in November. Not only will Trump win, the Americans will take the house. We already know the Americans will retain the Senate.,

Further, I see real fear among the Communists. Polls are intended to sway the vote, not inform. Problem is, no one believes the polls. The Communists shot their wad in 2016 - along with the election tampering by the FBI, CIA, and NSA.

You have failed to read the room.
 
I love hearing irresponsible citizens who confuse the concept of freedom wth the concept of being free to take financial risks that the rest of the society pays when they have an unexpected sickness and discover that they do not have the money to cover the healthcare cost. In any case, the claim of if Trump kept or not the promise about Obamacare was not raised by me.

Communists support the freedom of people to obey without questioning.

democrats seek the 'liberty" of the proles to wear chains and serve their betters.
 
You have failed to read the room.

democrats will lose, and spectacularly.

Then they will wail and moan and wonder how this could happen.

The problem with the Marxists is they are REALLY stupid. When you spend 9 months telling everyone that you're going to engage in the most massive election fraud in history, as the democrats have done, people tend to make preparations.

The Communist leadership is scared - 600 lawyers scared. If they can't feed "Franken ballots" by the million, Xiden has no chance.
 
Communists support the freedom of people to obey without questioning.

democrats seek the 'liberty" of the proles to wear chains and serve their betters.

The people wh count on others to pay their healthcare bill when things go wrong and find themselves uninsured and unabe to cver the cost are real communists...
 
Joe? Pack the court?
Joe? Dump the electoral college?
Joe? DC and PR statehood?

Where'd you go, Joe? Joe? JOE?..........:giggle:
 
The people wh count on others to pay their healthcare bill when things go wrong and find themselves uninsured and unabe to cver the cost are real communists...

Who is that? The democrat constituency in deep blue inner cities.

The rise of health insurance is a detriment to society. Medicare precipitated it, but what was done was to decouple the service from those paying for that service. Essentially, the end user doesn't pick up the cost and is under no financial constraint to allocate resources in a thrifty and judicious manner. The attempt to socialize medicine with single payer exasperates the issue and ensures both shortages and rationing of care. The average emergency room visit takes 9 hours to be seen by a doctor or PA. This is driven by the fact that the ER is an unregulated provider of care who cannot turn anyone away, regardless of ability to pay. The single payer schemes of the Marxist democrats turn the entire care system into a similar disaster,
 
Who is that? The democrat constituency in deep blue inner cities.

The rise of health insurance is a detriment to society. Medicare precipitated it, but what was done was to decouple the service from those paying for that service. Essentially, the end user doesn't pick up the cost and is under no financial constraint to allocate resources in a thrifty and judicious manner. The attempt to socialize medicine with single payer exasperates the issue and ensures both shortages and rationing of care. The average emergency room visit takes 9 hours to be seen by a doctor or PA. This is driven by the fact that the ER is an unregulated provider of care who cannot turn anyone away, regardless of ability to pay. The single payer schemes of the Marxist democrats turn the entire care system into a similar disaster,

I have no problem wit poor using publis assistance. I have a problem with people who are not at the bottom of the economic ladder use public assistance when they get hit. Mandatory coverage did not penalize the very poor. These people were exempt from fines The fines hit those who made a financial choice to assume to remain uninsured and transfer the risk that the rest of the society which would be forced to pay during an unexpected event of a serious illness.

Other countriess have shown how the rise of PUBLIC heath insurance is actually beneficial to the society. It is the rise of PRIVATE health insurance with no serious public insurance (except for older people through medicare) which has created a mess in the US system whch continues to be a mess even after Obamacare. But this is irrelvant to the point about the moral judgement of mandatory insurance. Such mandatory requiement is as necesarry and moral as the mandatory requirrement to have a car insurance when you drive a car in publc roads and an unexpected accident can force the public pay its cost when you are uninsured and unable to pay.
 
Where are trump's tax returns? What is the health plan he's going to replace the ACA with?

When is Xiden going to condemn NAMBLA? Does he support the rape of children?
 
I have no problem wit poor using publis assistance. I have a problem with people who are not at the bottom of the economic ladder use public assistance when they get hit. Mandatory coverage did not penalize the very poor. These people were exempt from fines The fines hit those who made a financial choice to assume to remain uninsured and transfer the risk that the rest of the society which would be forced to pay during an unexpected event of a serious illness.

Other countriess have shown how the rise of PUBLIC heath insurance is actually beneficial to the society. It is the rise of PRIVATE health insurance with no serious public insurance (except for older people through medicare) which has created a mess in the US system whch continues to be a mess even after Obamacare. But this is irrelvant to the point about the moral judgement of mandatory insurance. Such mandatory requiement is as necesarry and moral as the mandatory requirrement to have a car insurance when you drive a car in publc roads and an unexpected accident can force the public pay its cost when you are uninsured and unable to pay.

This is nonsense.

The claims of the wonders of socialized medicine are total shit. No one is flying to Canada for medical treatment, because healthcare in Canada is a disaster. I have unfortunately experienced British healthcare first hand - though American ER care is now just as bad. Innovation and efficiency the first casualty. The exemplary care of private groups like Kaiser simply doesn't exist in the public square.

In every sector of our economy we have excellence, food, housing, transportation, consumer goods. Why? Because they are all driven by a free market where consumers buy the best they can afford. Competition keeps the manufacturers and providers innovating and refining to the best quality at the best price.

But no with healthcare, because the market was destroyed. If we paid out of pocket for services they would cost a tiny fraction of what they do now, and would be more effective - as is the case in every other part of our economy - where the market prevails.

Oh, and liability insurance is required to drive on public roads, but not to own or drive a car.
 
I asked you a question first is there a reason for your indecision?

The indecision about t-rexes? I have no indecision or worries about them.
 
This is nonsense.

The claims of the wonders of socialized medicine are total shit. No one is flying to Canada for medical treatment, because healthcare in Canada is a disaster. I have unfortunately experienced British healthcare first hand - though American ER care is now just as bad. Innovation and efficiency the first casualty. The exemplary care of private groups like Kaiser simply doesn't exist in the public square.

In every sector of our economy we have excellence, food, housing, transportation, consumer goods. Why? Because they are all driven by a free market where consumers buy the best they can afford. Competition keeps the manufacturers and providers innovating and refining to the best quality at the best price.

But no with healthcare, because the market was destroyed. If we paid out of pocket for services they would cost a tiny fraction of what they do now, and would be more effective - as is the case in every other part of our economy - where the market prevails.

Oh, and liability insurance is required to drive on public roads, but not to own or drive a car.

You do not know what you are talking about.

First of all, travelling to Canada does not make you eligible to be covered by Canadian healthcare system and get much cheaper treatment. So, there is no reason to do so.

On the other hand, thousands cross the borders to get prescriptin drugs in Canada


Quiet resurgence: Americans coming north to fill prescriptions on the rise again

The point of liability insurance does not change my point which is that it IS required when public risk is involved. So, yes, when you drive the car in public roads, it IS required and there is not any moral issue about "tyranny" and the other usual rhetoric wee hear from conservatives. If you just want to have a car in your garage, then there is no public risk involved from such choice and there is no requirement to have a car insurance. So, unless you sped yourr whole life isolated in your garge, you cannot claim with a straight face that there is no public risk of paying for yourr healthcare cost if you become sick.
 
That wasn't what my question was about.

If your question wasn't about t-rexes then I have no idea what kind of dinosaurs you were referring to. It's possible you were confusing t-rexes with allosauruses (allosaurusi?). People get those mixed up all the time.
 
If your question wasn't about t-rexes then I have no idea what kind of dinosaurs you were referring to. It's possible you were confusing t-rexes with allosaurs. People get those mixed up all the time.
so because you refuse to answer my question I'm going to take it as a no and just consider you to be hypocritical.
 
so because you refuse to answer my question I'm going to take it as a no and just consider you to be hypocritical.

I do not support dinosaurs being brought back from the past to be employed as uber drivers. Now you answer my question.
 
Back
Top Bottom