• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Biden on the Barrett Nomination

The GOP are too incompetent to get repeal OR replace, so they're asking the courts to do the simple part - the repeal, via judicial fiat, because they can't get it done the typical way, you know, with a vote in Congress. Worthless. Been trying for 10 years and they're hoping Roberts et al. bail them out.
It took Democrats decades to get a healthcare plan passed, and that only happened with a lot of bribery, back-door deals, and rule-changes. Of the 30 or so candidates they ran this year, I don't think a single one argued that it was working well.
 
in 2016, the GOP which had the senate, said we won't act on a Dem candidate but the Dems screamed to fill the seat. The GOP still has the senate, but now the WH and the Dems are screaming to wait. Both sides are somewhat hypocritical but what the Dems lie about is that in both cases, they don't hold the senate and it has been over 100 years since a president was able to confirm a justice in an election year, when the other party controlled the senate
Bull crap, muster just a bit of integrity if you can.
 
Bull crap, muster just a bit of integrity if you can.
I realize factual reality sucks to the hard left, but the fact remains, no president has had an election year nominee seated when the other party holds the senate, in over 100 years
 
I've already voted, so really nothing Biden proclaims matters.
 
I realize factual reality sucks to the hard left, but the fact remains, no president has had an election year nominee seated when the other party holds the senate, in over 100 years
Do not delude yourself, your partisan blinders allow you to realize very little. Your crap excuse is just that and it has nothing to do with what or why the nomination of Garland was derailed.
 
The original assertion is that blacks benefited off the backs of white people, when it was in fact the other way around. Whites benefited from free labor for hundreds of years and accumulated vast wealth off black people. Blacks effectively built America, while blacks continued to struggle under white-centric policies until recent years.

A few whites benefited from free black labor centuries ago....when blacks were enslaved and sold off by other blacks.

Since then, millions of African-Americans have been benefiting from living in a majority white country and are the envy of people of African descent all over the world who would just love to change places with African-Americans.

The comment that blacks "built America" is so obviously ludicrous that it doesn't deserve mention save to say that much of the current African-American population is a drain on the American economy due to its high crime rate, high rate of imprisonment and high rate of receiving government aid.
 
Back
Top Bottom