• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Biblical proof that Evolution is true

i am fine with the article, me thinks you make mountains out of moe hills....

However, it is important to note that the Hebrew word used for "circle" in these passages can also mean "round" or "sphere"

Except it’s clear the Bible did not mean sphere when you consider the Bible also claims there’s a mountain from which the entire Earth can be seen, something only possible if the world is flat.

Was the Bible lying when it claimed such a mountain exists?
 
Except it’s clear the Bible did not mean sphere when you consider the Bible also claims there’s a mountain from which the entire Earth can be seen, something only possible if the world is flat.

Was the Bible lying when it claimed such a mountain exists?

no i don't think so. you didn't include the verse, which would make it hard to comment on.
 
no i don't think so. you didn't include the verse, which would make it hard to comment on.

I thought you supposedly knew the Gospels and your primary goal is to spread the Gospels to people?

Why have I, an atheist, more knowledge of what’s in them than you?

Matthew 4:8
 
I thought you supposedly knew the Gospels and your primary goal is to spread the Gospels to people?

Why have I, an atheist, more knowledge of what’s in them than you?

Matthew 4:8
No, you don't...
 
No, you don't...

Are you ready to admit your cult has lied to you yet?

Or are you standing by your claim that they haven’t and you had knowledge of the child rapes they were covering up and did nothing about them?
 
Are you ready to admit your cult has lied to you yet?

Or are you standing by your claim that they haven’t and you had knowledge of the child rapes they were covering up and did nothing about them?
Deflection acknowledged and rejected...
 
Isaiah 43:10. "You are my witnesses," declares the LORD (Yahwah), "and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am He. Before me no god formed, nor will there be one after me.
This hypothesis can't be tested, observed or duplicated. It's not science.

Evolution is proven with DNA. We don't need Darwin. Linnaeus paved the way for Darwin with modern taxonomy. We are a species of ape.
 
"Biblical proof" is an oxymoron.

The bible says the Earth is flat, that someone lived inside a whale, that every single person on earth came from two people that were created from dust.

Its not a science book, don't treat it as one.
No, even Aristotle said normal folk knew the earth is not flat simply by watching boats get lower and lower as they approached the horizon.,
That idea was started as anti-Christian attack by Washington Irving, researched in great detail in this book

Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians​

by Jeffrey Burton Russell
He begins with a discussion of geographical knowledge in the Middle Ages, examining what Columbus and his contemporaries actually did believe, and then moves to a look at how the error was first propagated in the 1820s and 1830s―including how noted writers Washington Irving and Antoinne-Jean Letronne were among those responsible. He shows how later day historians followed these original mistakes, and how this snowball effect grew to outrageous proportions in the late nineteenth century, when Christians opposed to Darwinism were labelled as similar to Medieval Christians who (allegedly) thought the earth was flat. But perhaps the most intriguing focus of the book is the reason why we allow this error to persist.

As to Jonah, many BIble scholars incl me , say that Jesus' use of this story in relation to His Resurrection is more applicable if Jonah was dead and swallowed and upon being belched up on the shore ,was revived. Your view is not uncommon but is mainly from people who don't believe it anyway !!!

That everyone came from 2 people is shown scientifically as conformable to genetics by

The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry​

by S. Joshua Swamidass
and
S. Joshua Swamidass is an American computational biologist, physician, academic, and author. He is an associate professor of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, and a Faculty Lead of Translational Bioinformatics in the Institute for Informatics at Washington University in St. Louis.
 
Back
Top Bottom