• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passes

Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

sadly that is true from what I have seen.
getting paid 10 dollars for not really having any job skills is not a bad gig.

Yes. You are right. Here's an example of a different way of thinking. My former stepdaughter graduated high school two years ago. A few months before graduation she started working at Waffle House as a hostess then later as a server. She worked hard, made a lot of money. The owner had her covering shifts at two stores. She graduated high school and started college. While she made good money in tips, her rate did not go up and the managers wouldn't be flexible on her scheduling. She easily landed a job at Wild Wings Cafe. It paid better and tips were better. After being there for a year, she had a discussion about rate and scheduling, her school schedule changed. When the manager told her that he couldn't raise her rate, she began looking for a new job. Quickly landed one at a much better restaurant chain that not only gave her flexible scheduling but paid 10% of her school, sounds like a tiny amount, right? But it beats zero. She's making much more in tips, her actual wage is higher. Wild Wings manager offered to bring her back still at the same rate but with more flexible scheduling. It wasn't happening. She's moved up since then.

The government didn't have to step in and make the restaurants pay her more, she earned it by proving that she's an excellent employee. If they call her and she is available she covers extra shifts. Last Friday and Saturday she worked 20 hours in two days, yes, she's in overtime, but the tips are where is at.

There are two ways to make more money. You can bust your tail and you will make more or they will lose you to someone who will pay more... Or you can put forth a minimal effort and vote Democrat hoping they increase the minimum wage.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Those arent opinions. Those are facts.


So you decry opinions (which are actually facts of the matter at Berkley), but reinforce that with opinions? :lamo


:lamo

Keep on ignoring the overreaching points I presented.
Reinforced with the opinion of a doer vs a bunch of people that have never left college and keep getting paid to preach to a new crop of debt ridden wide eyed suckerfish? Yes....I'll take the opinion of a man that knows what he is talking about because he has done it vs the opinion of a college professor that believes he knows what he is talking about any day.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Reinforced with the opinion of a doer vs a bunch of people that have never left college and keep getting paid to preach to a new crop of debt ridden wide eyed suckerfish? Yes....I'll take the opinion of a man that knows what he is talking about because he has done it vs the opinion of a college professor that believes he knows what he is talking about any day.

that is what I liked about where I went to college when I was taking my management classes.
they didn't hire any teacher that didn't have a masters degree in their field and at least 5 years of working
experience.

of course I paid through the nose a bit to be taught by professionals but it was worth it.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Reinforced with the opinion of a doer vs a bunch of people that have never left college and keep getting paid to preach to a new crop of debt ridden wide eyed suckerfish? Yes....
Oh yes! I forgot we must now ignore research and analysis of economists now!? :lamo Your argument is falling a part before your eyes!
Also you do realize this debate is about BERKELEY CALIFORNIA and if the RAISE IN THE MINIMUM WAGE is the REASON FOR THESE EMPLOYEES BEING FIRED

I'll take the opinion of a man that knows what he is talking about because he has done it vs the opinion of a college professor that believes he knows what he is talking about any day.
:lamo
1.)These two statements: "1.)UC "employs about 100,000 nonteaching staffers, most of whom already earn much more than $15 an hour" and finally 2.)Was paid for by "parking fees, hospital revenues and bookstore sales." are not opinions
2.)This is also not an opinion, this is making a statement of fact based off reports and analyis from cities who have raised their minimum wage "Reports from cities that have adopted significantly higher minimum wages in recent yearshave shown that higher wages have been manageable for businesses and have not led tolayoffs or slowed job growth.In both San Jose and San Francisco, for example, jobs in the restaurant industry grew fasterafter the minimum wage was increased than they did in surrounding cities and counties thatdid not raise wages. In SeaTac, Washington—the first city in the United States to fully transitionto a $15 minimum wage for workers in the hospitality and travel industries—predictedlayoffs and expansion-plan cancellations did not materialize, and in fact some business owners,who were previously opposed to the wage increase, have expanded operations. And inSeattle, which began phasing-in its $15 minimum wage in April 2015, initial signs are positive.The Seattle region’s unemployment rate hit an eight-year low of 3.6 percent in August2015, significantly lower that the state unemployment rate of 5.3 percent." 404 Not Found
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Oh yes! I forgot we must now ignore research and analysis of economists now!? :lamo Your argument is falling a part before your eyes!
Also you do realize this debate is about BERKELEY CALIFORNIA and if the RAISE IN THE MINIMUM WAGE is the REASON FOR THESE EMPLOYEES BEING FIRED


:lamo
1.)These two statements: "1.)UC "employs about 100,000 nonteaching staffers, most of whom already earn much more than $15 an hour" and finally 2.)Was paid for by "parking fees, hospital revenues and bookstore sales." are not opinions
2.)This is also not an opinion, this is making a statement of fact based off reports and analyis from cities who have raised their minimum wage "Reports from cities that have adopted significantly higher minimum wages in recent yearshave shown that higher wages have been manageable for businesses and have not led tolayoffs or slowed job growth.In both San Jose and San Francisco, for example, jobs in the restaurant industry grew fasterafter the minimum wage was increased than they did in surrounding cities and counties thatdid not raise wages. In SeaTac, Washington—the first city in the United States to fully transitionto a $15 minimum wage for workers in the hospitality and travel industries—predictedlayoffs and expansion-plan cancellations did not materialize, and in fact some business owners,who were previously opposed to the wage increase, have expanded operations. And inSeattle, which began phasing-in its $15 minimum wage in April 2015, initial signs are positive.The Seattle region’s unemployment rate hit an eight-year low of 3.6 percent in August2015, significantly lower that the state unemployment rate of 5.3 percent." 404 Not Found
In those same article you personally are citing they are stating there isnt anywhere near enough time, research, and data to draw ANY of cthe conclusions of gain you are crowing about. You seek confirmation bias from like minded socialist 'theorists' because it is what you want to hear. And yes...we cant stress and emphasize enough...you seek your counsel from theorists...people that arent actual DOING anything.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

In those same article you personally are citing they are stating there isnt anywhere near enough time, research, and data to draw ANY of cthe conclusions of gain you are crowing about.
But wait, I thought raising the wage would decrease jobs. So far we have not seen that. So now your excuse is "just give it more time". You are pulling out a lot of excuses for here.

You seek confirmation bias from like minded socialist 'theorists' because it is what you want to hear.
:lamo Oh boy. I forgot anyone that disagrees with you or presents facts that go against your narrative are the scary "s" word

And yes...we cant stress and emphasize enough...you seek your counsel from theorists...people that arent actual DOING anything.
This isnt a ****ing theorist! This is an economic analysis! :lamo

Also you do realize this debate is about BERKELEY CALIFORNIA and if the RAISE IN THE MINIMUM WAGE is the REASON FOR THESE EMPLOYEES BEING FIRED?
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

But wait, I thought raising the wage would decrease jobs. So far we have not seen that. So now your excuse is "just give it more time". You are pulling out a lot of excuses for here.


:lamo Oh boy. I forgot anyone that disagrees with you or presents facts that go against your narrative are the scary "s" word


This isnt a ****ing theorist! This is an economic analysis! :lamo

Also you do realize this debate is about BERKELEY CALIFORNIA and if the RAISE IN THE MINIMUM WAGE is the REASON FOR THESE EMPLOYEES BEING FIRED?
Who would you turn to for employment?
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Who would you turn to for employment?

This question literally has nothing to do with my post.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

This question literally has nothing to do with my post.
The question literally has everything to do with the conversation. You turn to theorists for your beliefs. Should you ever want an actual 'job' you wont be finding that job from the theorists and you might be better served listening to those that actually have real world knowledge and experience.

Just sayin....
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

The question literally has everything to do with the conversation. You turn to theorists for your beliefs.
An economic analysis of a current situation is not theory.

Should you ever want an actual 'job' you wont be finding that job from the theorists and you might be better served listening to those that actually have real world knowledge and experience.
I have an actual job.

Just sayin....
You continue to ignore the majority of the post :applaud
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

An economic analysis of a current situation is not theory.


I have an actual job.


You continue to ignore the majority of the post :applaud
Is your employer a socialist? Is he a theorist?
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Is your employer a socialist?
No. My employer is a labor organization and I also do self employed work as well.

Is he a theorist?
No.

Also the paper you are getting held up on is not a theoretical paper. Its a fact sheet that analyzes trends and evidence. A cause (the minimum wage being raised) and effect (based off evidence what has it done to employment, etc). That is not "theory".
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Who would you turn to for employment?

Employment? Isn't the government going to give us the Life of Julia?
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

No. My employer is a labor organization and I also do self employed work as well.


No.

Also the paper you are getting held up on is not a theoretical paper. Its a fact sheet that analyzes trends and evidence. A cause (the minimum wage being raised) and effect (based off evidence what has it done to employment, etc). That is not "theory".
Its a theoretical offering by an advocacy group trying to prove its points by cherry picking parts of articles while ignoring the rest. "It will be seven years before the $15 wage is fully in place. So far, at least, “you do not see prices up or jobs going away,” he acknowledged. “Seattle is having a construction boom so there’s a feeling of prosperity.” In their own sourced article, there is zero possibility of analyzing change because it hasnt yet occurred, and the employment climate is impacted by NOT minimum wage jobs.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Its a theoretical offering by an advocacy group trying to prove its points by cherry picking parts of articles while ignoring the rest.
Do you even understand what "theory" is?

"It will be seven years before the $15 wage is fully in place. So far, at least, “you do not see prices up or jobs going away,” he acknowledged. “Seattle is having a construction boom so there’s a feeling of prosperity.” In their own sourced article, there is zero possibility of analyzing change because it hasnt yet occurred, and the employment climate is impacted by NOT minimum wage jobs.
And did you miss the rest of the cities they analyzed?
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

i think there's serious misunderstanding about the idea behind a living wage. It isn't to force companies to hire X # of workers. We assume they hire as few as possible no matter the wage, but that they should have to pay those they do hire a living wage. Thus a living wage cannot impact the # of workers, except maybe at bloated bureucracies. This is why seattle saw hardly any layoffs and no real price increase other than restaurants
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

i think there's serious misunderstanding about the idea behind a living wage. It isn't to force companies to hire X # of workers. We assume they hire as few as possible no matter the wage, but that they should have to pay those they do hire a living wage. Thus a living wage cannot impact the # of workers, except maybe at bloated bureucracies. This is why seattle saw hardly any layoffs and no real price increase other than restaurants

A "living wage" is the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow that is not realistically attainable. What is a living wage, forcing McDonalds to pay $15.00 per hour to workers working 15-20 hours per week? Is $300 per week a living wage? What's next, a law outlawing part time jobs so that people really will be earning a living wage? Prices will rise in response to increases in the minimum wage, meaning that the poor will be spending more money wherever they go to shop or need services performed. The minimum wage is called the minimum wage for a reason - because it is the minimum needed to get by with. The minimum wage, no matter what it is, will never be a living wage, hence chasing the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. The left is in fantasy land if they think that companies already paying $20 per hour will raise their wages even higher in response to the minimum wage increase, meaning that the middle class will fall farther behind than they are now. What about high school kids graduating soon? Why go through all that hard work in going to college and taking on student loans if they can earn a living wage working at McDonalds right out of high school? What about automation cutting down jobs? For every action there is a reaction. The left wants to bury their heads in the sand and think that jobs lost to automation were going to happen anyway so they totally discount them, as if their liberal policies had absolutely nothing to do with pushing employers in this direction.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

A "living wage" is the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow that is not realistically attainable. What is a living wage, forcing McDonalds to pay $15.00 per hour to workers working 15-20 hours per week? Is $300 per week a living wage? What's next, a law outlawing part time jobs so that people really will be earning a living wage? Prices will rise in response to increases in the minimum wage, meaning that the poor will be spending more money wherever they go to shop or need services performed. The minimum wage is called the minimum wage for a reason - because it is the minimum needed to get by with. The minimum wage, no matter what it is, will never be a living wage, hence chasing the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. The left is in fantasy land if they think that companies already paying $20 per hour will raise their wages even higher in response to the minimum wage increase, meaning that the middle class will fall farther behind than they are now. What about high school kids graduating soon? Why go through all that hard work in going to college and taking on student loans if they can earn a living wage working at McDonalds right out of high school? What about automation cutting down jobs? For every action there is a reaction. The left wants to bury their heads in the sand and think that jobs lost to automation were going to happen anyway so they totally discount them, as if their liberal policies had absolutely nothing to do with pushing employers in this direction.

Our min wage was over $10/hr (adjusted for inflation) during the late 1960's. Are we not a richer more productive society today than we were then?

Why shouldn't all income classes share in our wealth? The rich certainly benefit from the technology improvements and infrastructure improvements that have been going on for well over a hundred years, do you resent the rich being wealthier also?
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Our min wage was over $10/hr (adjusted for inflation) during the late 1960's. Are we not a richer more productive society today than we were then?

Why shouldn't all income classes share in our wealth? The rich certainly benefit from the technology improvements and infrastructure improvements that have been going on for well over a hundred years, do you resent the rich being wealthier also?

Not understanding your post. If our minimum wage is less now (adjusted for inflation) than in the 1960's, and we are a richer more productive society, what is it you want - a poorer, more non-productive society? Doesn't that tell you something all by itself?

"The rich certainly benefit from the technology improvements and infrastructure improvements that have been going on for well over a hundred years" - so? They paid for more of that than John and Jane Doe did!

I am jealous of the rich too but that's what this is all about, bottom line. The poor are jealous of the rich. At least admit that much. Just because I'm jealous of the rich doesn't mean it is their job to take care of me. I'm jealous of lottery winners. I'm jealous of doctors and lawyers. I'm jealous of sports superstars and Hollywood. I had my chance, just as every American does. I chose not to be a sports superstar or a movie star or a doctor or a lawyer. I didn't even try so I have no business forcing them to make up for my mistakes or my life choices. If I wanted it I should have gone for it. I didn't. My problem.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Not understanding your post. If our minimum wage is less now (adjusted for inflation) than in the 1960's, and we are a richer more productive society, what is it you want - a poorer, more non-productive society? Doesn't that tell you something all by itself?

"The rich certainly benefit from the technology improvements and infrastructure improvements that have been going on for well over a hundred years" - so? They paid for more of that than John and Jane Doe did!

I am jealous of the rich too but that's what this is all about, bottom line. The poor are jealous of the rich. At least admit that much. Just because I'm jealous of the rich doesn't mean it is their job to take care of me. I'm jealous of lottery winners. I'm jealous of doctors and lawyers. I'm jealous of sports superstars and Hollywood. I had my chance, just as every American does. I chose not to be a sports superstar or a movie star or a doctor or a lawyer. I didn't even try so I have no business forcing them to make up for my mistakes or my life choices. If I wanted it I should have gone for it. I didn't. My problem.

You and others who fight against increases in the minimum wage, including some who would like to see even the base rate abolished, are doing little more than fighting for a return to the "Good Ol' Days" of feudal servitude, of no public education for the poor, no public welfare system of any type - in fact too many who are supporting Trump would be among those most greatly affected by some of the measures he and others are advocating - though in their ignorance they refuse to accept such a reality.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

You and others who fight against increases in the minimum wage, including some who would like to see even the base rate abolished, are doing little more than fighting for a return to the "Good Ol' Days" of feudal servitude, of no public education for the poor, no public welfare system of any type - in fact too many who are supporting Trump would be among those most greatly affected by some of the measures he and others are advocating - though in their ignorance they refuse to accept such a reality.

Yup. Many of us really like to vote against our best interest. And we do it over and over again.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

You and others who fight against increases in the minimum wage, including some who would like to see even the base rate abolished, are doing little more than fighting for a return to the "Good Ol' Days" of feudal servitude, of no public education for the poor, no public welfare system of any type - in fact too many who are supporting Trump would be among those most greatly affected by some of the measures he and others are advocating - though in their ignorance they refuse to accept such a reality.

That's just not true. The free market determines the true minimum wage. You won't find many McDonalds or Walmarts anywhere paying $7.25 per hour because the free market shows them that they can't hire people for that. You're crazy if you think the right wants no education for the poor. In fact, we want the exact opposite. We want the poor to be educated so they don't make all the stupid mistakes they make now, with many dropping out of school or not going to college. The more educated they are the less we have to pay in government programs. I know of almost no one on the right, except for maybe Libertarians, who want to abolish welfare. We just want to get people off and working and eliminate the fraud, not keep them in an endless cycle of poverty, carried down from generation to generation.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

That's just not true. The free market determines the true minimum wage. You won't find many McDonalds or Walmarts anywhere paying $7.25 per hour because the free market shows them that they can't hire people for that. You're crazy if you think the right wants no education for the poor. In fact, we want the exact opposite. We want the poor to be educated so they don't make all the stupid mistakes they make now, with many dropping out of school or not going to college. The more educated they are the less we have to pay in government programs. I know of almost no one on the right, except for maybe Libertarians, who want to abolish welfare. We just want to get people off and working and eliminate the fraud, not keep them in an endless cycle of poverty, carried down from generation to generation.

Nice to know you support "education" but I constantly read rants from many who label themselves conservative, about our public education system and how we taxpayers shouldn't be spending so much of our money on those liberal indoctrination centers. Too many GOP-controlled legislatures are shifting public funds to charter schools run by for-profit focused corporations or to schools focused on certain religious beliefs.

A much larger amount is spent(wasted) on corporate subsidies and tax breaks than on welfare fraud.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

Nice to know you support "education" but I constantly read rants from many who label themselves conservative, about our public education system and how we taxpayers shouldn't be spending so much of our money on those liberal indoctrination centers. Too many GOP-controlled legislatures are shifting public funds to charter schools run by for-profit focused corporations or to schools focused on certain religious beliefs.

A much larger amount is spent(wasted) on corporate subsidies and tax breaks than on welfare fraud.

We shouldn't be using tax payer money to finance liberal or conservative education. It should be for education period and keep the politics out of it.
 
Re: Berkeley Touts $15 Minimum Wage and Then Fires Hundreds of Workers After It Passe

We shouldn't be using tax payer money to finance liberal or conservative education. It should be for education period and keep the politics out of it.

We can agree on the basic premise, unfortunately as with too many things in our world, the 'definitions' of what is "liberal or conservative" are all too often not mutually acceptable
 
Back
Top Bottom