Haymarket gets confused on rights regularly. He doesn't seem to realize that no matter what voting is a privilege that only exists because of governments existence.
Do you understand the difference in what you just wrote?
Here is a clue: go to my statement in 276 and reproduce the words where I said you supported slavery.
Go for it.
Let my exact words speak for themselves since it is so clear to you and Thrilla.
Such as?
Again - personal property rights are a cornerstone of economics.
Do you have trouble reading what the US Constitution actually says?
Does your copy of the Constitution contain Amendments which specifically use the term RIGHT TO VOTE or any other variation of that term RIGHT TO VOTE?
I expect that you understand when you say to me that the slave owners would be cheering me on that means I would support their claims of slaves. Why else would they be cheering me on? Because I support property?
Go tell felons who can't vote, about their "right to vote."
Property rights and the unfettered accumulation of wealth are what give the rich power over others.Which is why statist decivilizers hate property rights and do everything in their power to denigrate them. Property rights stand between them and their coveted power over others.
Do you have trouble figuring out where government comes from?
If the government is the collective organization of the people and was created by the people nothing that goes with it is a right. It's a bit obvious.
Why are you failing to answer the specific question?
Does your copy of the Constitution contain Amendments which specifically use the term RIGHT TO VOTE or any other variation of that term RIGHT TO VOTE?
Property rights and the unfettered accumulation of wealth are what give the rich power over others.
The US Constitution - a document which I trust a billion times more than I trust your own pontifications based on extremist ideology and self imposed beliefs - says otherwise.
Several times in fact.
:lamo What planet are you from? It sure isn't Earth or your species would have died out long, long ago.The point is that no person has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate aggression against another person or his property.
They will HUNT YOU DOWN!!! :lamo So violence IS alright ... but only under certain circumstances.Whether you belong to an association is irrelevant. If you murder someone, that person's protection agency will come to you looking for compensation. You do not "get off" just because you don't belong to some association.
Aren't you guys all the same?!? I constantly see self-professed Libertarians talking about "liberal" this and "liberal" that (or they use their synonym phrase "the left") like all liberals are the same. A recent post of yours is an excellent example, "... unprincipled and unlimited government such as that desired by the left". LOL! You think everyone on "the left" (or anyone short of a few fringe elements on "the left") wants an "unprincipled and unlimited government"?!?which brand of libertarianism are you talking about?
That's just horsecrap you're spewing now. You have no clue what the laws are here or how public employees and public unions are handled.Then things must be much different in other parts of the world than they are here because no non-politician or any group of non-politicians can "take over" the government here.Of course they can - which is why I label this an "effective" ceding of sovereignty rather than a "nominal" one. It's the classic De Toqueville nightmare of concentrated v dissipated interest.
Nope.
10char
I like how you failed to defend the accuracy of their declaration. I also like how you failed to take notice that its only given to some making it even treated like a privilege after the declaration.
whoa....:shock:
Try again.
It means just what I wrote. That slave owners across the South would cheer you on since your defense of property rights is one of the excuses they gave for their ownership of other human beings.
I clearly stated that THEY would support you. I did not say that YOU supported THEM.
Perhaps that distinction was lost upon both you and Thrilla who also seems to not being able to properly read what is written?
yes, i'm guilty of generalizing too... and no, libertarians are not all the same.Aren't you guys all the same?!? I constantly see self-professed Libertarians talking about "liberal" this and "liberal" that (or they use their synonym phrase "the left") like all liberals are the same. A recent post of yours is an excellent example, "... unprincipled and unlimited government such as that desired by the left". LOL! You think everyone on "the left" (or anyone short of a few fringe elements on "the left") wants an "unprincipled and unlimited government"?!?
You guys crack me up sometimes.
You very often use the term "parasite" to mean much more than you're espousing here. Don't be shy, 'fess up!parasites come in all economic levels. and most working people aren't. its the people who try to gain power by pretending to care about the poor and use their plight as an argument for taking more money from others.
and yeah if you blame others for your lot in life and want others to pay your way that makes you a parasite
yes, i'm guilty of generalizing too... and no, libertarians are not all the same.
I tend to point out liberals quite a bit because i'm pretty pissed that folks have co-opted that label who are not liberal.
I happen to like and respect liberalism as an ideology, it's very close to libertarianism .. and it pisses me off that leftist authoritarians ( the opposite of liberals) tend to self describe as liberal 'round here.
due the the nature of the internet and the pack mentality , liberals won't tend to call out their own.... so i do, and yes, i get carried away with it.
You very often use the term "parasite" to mean much more than you're espousing here. Don't be shy, 'fess up!
You have asserted that everyone making under (I believe you latest figure was) $117k is not paying their "fair share". In effect, they are taking money from the government.
You believe everyone getting any government money at all is a parasite (and various other derogatory terms) and it doesn't matter what their beliefs may be - unless they agree with you 100%.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?