Really, you are comparing the joke that Obama was making to a crowd that was obviously laughing (you can hear them), to the Beck's rant?
So what's the problem? lol
So, are you saying that anyone's writings that could be dangerous, should be treated uncivilly?
Could be is quite vague. I think the first amendment is beckoning you to read it.
I can't believe I didn't dawn on me last night, that I had read exactly the same words from someone else, as the ones I just quoted from you mertex... In fact, here they are:
Congradulations... You and Glenn Beck obviously think alike.
Frances Fox Piven and Enemies of the U.S. Constitution - FOXNews.com
No, just leftist morons who advocate taking it to the streets...
What about rightwing morons who advocate taking it to the streets. Do they get a pass?
I believe what he meant by "taking it to the streets", was the advocating of protests that involve violence and civil disobiedience... Therefore, I believe your question is invalid because as far as I know, there aren't any rightwingers that advocate such behavior.
So basically, it's OK for her to receive death threats because she's a Russian-Jewish Marxist from canada, and those people deserve to die or exiled, or, at the very least, threatened for their views. :lol:
"Don't retreat, reload".
The slogan of the Tea Party's leader is saying shoot instead of turning around and going the other way. Words are open to interpretation, so while you and I might agree that she is probably using it as a metaphor, obviously some people are not as quick on their feet as we are.
"Don't retreat, reload".
The slogan of the Tea Party's leader is saying shoot instead of turning around and going the other way. Words are open to interpretation, so while you and I might agree that she is probably using it as a metaphor, obviously some people are not as quick on their feet as we are.
I believe what he meant by "taking it to the streets", was the advocating of protests that involve violence and civil disobiedience... Therefore, I believe your question is invalid because as far as I know, there aren't any rightwingers that advocate such behavior.
I don't know Grim. I would say that those of some militant militias advocate violence and civil disobedience. Those groups would certainly be right wing. So, my question is certainly valid.
Here comes one trick Tucker with his "spin to Hypocritical" shtick!
It's not okay for anyone to receive death threats. However, to claim Beck is inciting death threats is silly. He often reiterates that for him, violence is NEVER the answer. But let's ignore that while you do your thing.
/sits back and watches Tucker ride his old worn out pony some more.
Aww aren't you cute. I read vague's rant too. You always were an unoriginal follower.Listen, just becuase you are a liberal-in-denial
Cite a few instead of making claims you can't back up kiddo.and that often leads you to have some of the most hypocritical positions of anyone I have ever encountered here at DP
You are so ADORABLE!, doesn't mean you should get mad at the messenger who tries to get you to embrace your liberal beliefs.
I don't think those terms, mean what you think they mean.Hell, the fact that you get pissy when your hypocricy is exposed instead of acting like a conservative and taking personal responsibility is proof enough of your liberalism, no?
I'm trying to do you a favor when I point out the hypocricy of your positions, Vic.
I want you to be strong enough to embrace who you really are, my liberal friend. I have faith in you. You don't have to face this alone.
How would you know if he lied?
Why should anyone be civil to this leftist moron whose writings could be very dangerous?
Aww aren't you cute. I read vague's rant too. You always were an unoriginal follower.
Cite a few instead of making claims you can't back up kiddo.
You are so ADORABLE!
I don't think those terms, mean what you think they mean.
Funny thing is, 90% of the time you do it with spin and strawman to try and score cool points.
Then when you get busted for it you get all prissy and try "soft insults, like you are now.
You could cite my liberal positions, I'd love for you to do that, really, cite them, with examples.
LOL.
That's a stretch. Palin, talking about not backing down on principles and standing for your rights and pressuring the GOP to stay conservative does not equal gun violence.
Amusing how far you people will stretch things.
sure you didn't. You just HAPPEN to take his "I'm really a liberal bit" on the same day, and after he posts that. I don't think so.I didn't read vauge's "rant", but I'll go look for it. Vauge's awesome.
It lasted a week. A week because I couldn't stand having the thought of someone on my ignore list.But have you forgotten the time when you put me on ignore up until I became the bartender (and I could no longer be ignored)?
You made a non-seniscal commentary and were doing your usual waste of our time shtick.You did that when I pointed out how much of a liberal you were by taking your "throw some government at it, that'll fix it" argumetn against drug legalization and pointed out how it was IDENTICAL to an argument against legal gun ownership. I beleive I simply change the words "drugs" to "guns" in order to do that.
No, you merely showed your pony for the first time.I started trying to get you to embrace your liberal nature way back then.
It's worse when people make **** up and then pretend their made up reality counted for something.It's common for those in deep denial to repress memories though. Sad, really.
Think back to all of the times you've thrown a hissy fit when I pointed out the hypocricy of your position instead of presenting an argument defending the consistency of your position. Given your assumption that I'm a one-trick pony, that should be every single thread where we've ever debated each other (if you are correct).
In every single instance where I've pointed out your hypocricy, you were being a hypocrite.
Laughable.Hypocricy is your one-trick pony.
If my one-trick is pointing out hypocricy, then it's going to be obvious that you get pissy with me a lot.
With oyur nose in the admins rear? It shows.Why thank you! I work out.
Check with a source that doesn't include your own delusions.I checked and they do mean what I thought they meant!
Did you have a dream where they meant something different? I know those seem real to you, enough so that you reject the actual reality when they occur, but they aren't real.
For example, that one the other night where you were playing with some of your old navy buddies and you ended up wakling up all wet? Didn't actually happen. That was called a nocturnal emmision, sweetie.
See, that's that liberal mentality coming out again. Embrace it!
:blink: Now you're just reaching.All you need to do is create an elaborate conspiracy theory which makes no sense at all that ends up with you being victimized in some way! You do it all the time anyway, you just pretend that you don't! Come out of that Blue-closet, Vic!
I asked for some examples, so we could all see what you are talking about, not just take your rantings at face value.I'm not sure why you think I am being "busted" by you explaining what I am doing in those instance wehre I am doing it. I have always acknowledged that yes, I do point out hypocritical positions. It happens a LOT with you, because you have a LOT of hypocritical views.
I've only disagreed with your assesment that it's my "one-trick".
I've actually proven that it wasn't before with you, but unfortunately acknowledging that would require you to acknowledge reality, and since THAT ain't going to happen any time soon (despite my sincere efforts to get you to embrace your liberalism), I guess I'll just have to accept that you will believe whatever nonsense you choose to believe regardless of the facts.
:shrug:
Unfortunately, you don't understand that they are liberal because you are in such extreme denial. Liebral and conservative don't mean the stances taken on individual issues. It's the underlying principles that define the two.
You use liberal reasoning to obtain your views on the issues, even if they seem to be conservative on the surface.
That's why your views are so hypcritical. The arguments you use to denounce a position you agree with can be used by others to denounce th epositions you do agree with, but through some mental acrobatics, attempts to dstricts from that realit, and a hefty dose of denial, you manage to convince yourself that when you do it, it's not the same.
I'm here to help you realize your true self, Vic.
I'm trying to get you off of that terrible trolly that keeps bringing you back to the neighborhood of make-believe.
I know you can do it.
Again, its not my fault she chose a violent metaphor.
sure you didn't. You just HAPPEN to take his "I'm really a liberal bit" on the same day, and after he posts that. I don't think so.
No Tucker likes to come into threads, and claim I'm making "liberal" arguments, he does it merely for troll factor. Instead of bothering to read his blather it's far simpler to ignore him.
You made a non-seniscal commentary and were doing your usual waste of our time shtick.
Such a Liberal argument, Vicchio.
Alernative examlpe of this liberal argument is:
Guns are bad. The problem with the war on guns is that people are too freaking stupid to figure that out. They wanna be cool, hollywood extolls it, rappers extoll it...
Smart Folks don't touch guns.
This message brought to you by the Tucker Case Foundation, A foundation that is hellbent on pointing out liberals who call themselves "conservative" for many years.
We all know your problem stems from the fact you are pro-drugs, I'm am not. So you attempt to mock and goad me with your faulty logic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?